Organizational Justice across Human Resource Management Decisions

International Review of Industrial and Organizational Psychology 2005

Volumn 20, Issue , 2006, Pages 149-175

  Gilliland, Stephen W ^a   Paddock, Layne ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA   (United States)

Author keywords

Distributive justice; Equality and need; HR functions; HR functions of hiring; Interpersonal justice; Organizational justice; Procedural justice principles; S A N framework

Indexed keywords

EID: 34147194208     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1002/0470029307.ch4     Document Type: Chapter

References (76)

1. Adams, J. S. (1965). Inequity in social exchange. In: L. Berkowitz (ed.), Advances in Experimental Social Psychology (Vol. 2, pp. 267-299). New York:Academic Press.
2. Arvey, R. D. & Faley, R. H. (1988). Fairness in Selecting Employees. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
3. Arvey, R. D. & Faley, R. H. (1988). Fairness in Selecting Employees. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
4. Austin, W. & Walster, E. (1974). Reactions to confirmations and disconfirmations of expectancies of equity and inequity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 30, 208-216.
5. Barber, A. E., Dunham, R. B., & Formisano, R. A. (1992). The impact of flexible benefits on employee satisfaction: A field study. Personnel Psychology, 45, 55-75.
6. Bauer, T. N., Maertz, C. P., Dolen, M. R., & Campion, M. A. (1998). Longitudinal assessment of applicant reactions to employment testing and test outcome feedback. Journal of Applied Psychology, 83, 892-903.
7. Bauer, T. N., Truxillo, D. M., Sanchez, R. J., Craig, J. M., Ferrara, P., & Campion, M. A. (2001). Applicant reactions to selection: Development of the selection procedural justice scale (SPJS). Personnel Psychology, 54, 388-420.
8. Bies, R. J. (1987). The predicament of injustice: The management of moral outrage. In: L. L. Cummings & B. M. Staw (eds), Research in Organizational Behavior (Vol. 9, pp. 289-319). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
9. Bies, R. J. & Moag, J. S. (1986). Interactional justice: Communication criteria of fairness. In: R. J. Lewicki, B. H. Sheppard, &M. H. Bazerman (eds), Research on Negotiation in Organizations (Vol. 1, pp. 43-55). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
10. Brockner, J., Grover, S., Reed, T., DeWitt, R., & O'Malley, M. (1987). Survivors'reactions to layoffs: We get by with a little help for our friends. Administrative Science Quarterly, 32, 526-541.
11. Brockner, J., Konovsky, M. A., Cooper-Schneider, R., Folger, R., Martin, C., & Bies, R. J. (1994). Interactive effects of procedural justice and outcome negativity on victims and survivors of job loss. Academy of Management Journal, 37, 397- 409.
12. Cardy, R. L. & Dobbins, G. (1993). Performance Appraisal. Cincinnati, OH: South- Western Publishing.
13. Chan, D., Schmitt, N., Jennings, D., Clause, C. S., & Delbridge, K. (1998). Applicant perceptions of test fairness integrating justice and self-serving bias perspectives. International Journal of Selection & Assessment, 6(4), 232-239.
14. Colquitt, J. A. (2001). On the dimensionality of organizational justice: A construct validation of a measure. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86, 386-400.
15. Colquitt, J. A., Conlon, D. E., Wesson, M. J., Porter, C. O. L. H., & Ng, K. Y. (2001). Justice at the millennium: A meta-analytic review of 25 years of justice research. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86, 425-445.
16. Cropanzano, R., Rupp, D. E., Mohler, C. J., & Schminke, M. (2001). Three roads to organizational justice. In: J. Ferris (ed.), Research in Personnel and Human Resources Management (Vol. 20, pp. 1-113). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
17. Cropanzano, R., Schminke, M., & Paddock, L. (2003). Revising the Structure of Overall Justice (Working paper). University of Arizona.
18. Danehower, C., Celuch, K., & Lust, J. (1994). Benefit management and communication: A marketing orientation. Human Resource Management Review, 4, 177- 195.
19. Davis, E. & Ward, E. (1995). Health benefit satisfaction in the public and private sectors: The role of distributive and procedural justice.Public Personnel Management,24, 255-270.
20. Deutsch, M. (1969). Conflicts: Productive and destructive. Journal of Social Issues, 25, 7-41.
21. Deutsch, M. (1975). Equity, equality, and need: What determines which value will be used as the basis of distributive justice? Journal of Social Issues, 31, 137-149.
22. Dipboye, R. L. & de Pontbriand, R. (1981). Correlates of employee reactions to performance appraisals and appraisal systems. Journal of Applied Psychology, 66, 248-251.
23. Downs, A. (1995). Corporate Executions: The Ugly Truth about Layoffs and How Corporate Greed Is Shattering Lives, Companies, and Communities. New York: Amacom.
24. Dreher, G. F., Ash, R. A., & Bretz, R. D. (1988). Benefit coverage and employee cost: Critical factors in explaining compensation satisfaction. Personnel Psychology, 4, 237-254.
25. Folger, R. (1977). Distributive and procedural justice: Combined impact of voice and improvement on experienced inequity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 35, 108-119.
26. Folger, R. & Greenberg, J. (1985). Procedural justice: An interpretive analysis of personnel systems. In: K. Rowland & G. Ferris (eds), Research in Personnel and Human Resource Management (Vol. 3, pp. 141-183). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
27. Folger, R. & Konovsky, M. (1989). Effects of procedural and distributive justice on reactions to pay raise decisions. Academy of Management Journal, 32, 115-130.
28. Folger, R., Konovsky, M. A., & Cropanzano, R. (1992). A due process metaphor for performance appraisal. In: B. M. Staw & L. L. Cummings (eds), Research in Organizational Behavior (Vol. 14, pp. 129-177). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
29. Folger, R., Sheppard, B. H., & Buttram, R. (1995). Three faces of justice. In: J. Rubin & B. Bunker (eds), Cooperation, Conflict, and Justice (pp. 261-289). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
30. Giacalone, R. A. & Greenberg, J. (1997). Antisocial Behavior in Organizations. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
31. Gilliland, S. W. (1993). The perceived fairness of selection systems: An organizational justice perspective. Academy of Management Review, 18, 694-734.
32. Gilliland, S. W. (1994). Effects of procedural and distributive justice on reactions to a selection system. Journal of Applied Psychology, 79, 691-701.
33. Gilliland, S. W. (1995). Fairness from the applicantś perspective: Reactions to employee selection procedures. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 3, 11-19.
34. Gilliland, S. W. & Chan, D. (2001). Justice in organizations: Theory, methods, and applications. In: N. Anderson & D. S. Ones (eds), Handbook of Industrial, Work and Organizational Psychology, Vol. 2: Organizational Psychology. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
35. Gilliland, S. W., Groth, M., Baker, R. C. IV, Dew, A. F., Polly, L. M., & Langdon, J. C. (2001). Improving applicantś reactions to rejection letters: An application of fairness theory. Personnel Psychology, 54, 699-703.
36. Gilliland, S. W. & Schepers, D. H. (2003). Why we do the things we do: A discussion and analysis of determinants of just treatment in layoff implementation decisions. Human Resource Management Review, 13, 59-83.
37. Gilliland, S. W. & Steiner, D. D. (2001). Causes and consequences of applicant perceptions of unfairness. In: R. Cropanzano (ed.), Justice in the Workplace: From Theory to Practice (Vol. 2, pp. 175-195). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
38. Grandey, A. (2001). Family friendly policies: Organizational justice perceptions of need-based allocations. In: R. Cropanzano (ed.), Justice in the Workplace: From Theory to Practice (Vol. 2, pp. 145-173). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
39. Greenberg, J. (1982). Approaching equity and avoiding inequity in groups and organizations. In: J. Greenberg & R. L. Cohen (eds), Equity and Justice in Social Behavior (pp. 389-435). New York: Academic Press.
40. Greenberg, J. (1986a). Determinants of perceived fairness of performance evaluations.Journal of Applied Psychology, 71, 340-342.
41. Greenberg, J. (1986b). Organizational performance appraisal procedures: What makes them fair? In: R. J. Lewicki, B. H. Sheppard, & M. H. Bazerman (eds), Research on Negotiation in Organizations (Vol. 1, pp. 25-41). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
42. Greenberg, J. (1990). Employee theft as a reaction to underpayment inequity: The hidden costs of pay cuts. Journal of Applied Psychology, 75, 561-568.
43. Greenberg, J. (1993). Stealing in the name of justice: Informational and interpersonal moderators of theft reactions to underpayment inequity. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 54, 81-103.
44. Greenberg, J. (1996). The Quest for Justice on the Job. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
45. Grover, S. L. (1991). Predicting the perceived fairness of parental leave policies.Journal of Applied Psychology, 76, 247-255.
46. Heneman, H. G., III & Schwab, D. P. (1985). Pay satisfaction: Its multidimensional nature and measurement. International Journal of Psychology, 20, 129-141.
47. Homans, G. C. (1961). Social Behavior: Its Elementary Forms. New York: Harcourt, Brace & World.
48. Kanfer, R., Sawyer, J., Earley, P. C., & Lind, E. A. (1987). Fairness and participation in evaluation procedures: Effects on task attitudes and performance. Social Justice Research, 1, 235-249.
49. Kluckhohn, C., Murray, H. A., & Schneider, D. M. (1953). Personality in Nature, Society, and Culture (2nd edn). Oxford, UK: Knopf.
50. Konovsky, M. A. & Brockner, J. (1993). Managing victim and survivor layoff reactions: A procedural justice perspective. In: R. Cropanzano (ed.), Justice in the Workplace (pp. 133-153). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
51. Konovsky, M. A. & Folger, R. (1991). The effects of procedures, social accounts, and benefits levels on victimś layoff reactions. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 21, 630-650.
52. Korsgaard, M. A. & Roberson, L. (1995). Procedural justice in performance evaluation: The role of instrumental and non-instrumental voice in performance appraisal discussions. Journal of Management, 21, 657-669.
53. Landy, F. J., Barnes, J. L., & Murphy, K. R. (1978). Correlates of perceived fairness and accuracy of performance evaluation. Journal of Applied Psychology, 63, 751-754.
54. Leventhal, G. S. (1976). The distribution of rewards and resources in groups and organizations. In: L. Berkowitz & E. Walster (eds), Advances in Experimental Social Psychology (Vol. 9, pp. 91-131). New York: Academic Press.
55. Leventhal, G. S. (1980). What should be done with equity theory? New approaches to the study of fairness in social relationships. In: K. J. Gergen, M. S. Greenberg, & R. H. Willis (eds), Social Exchange: Advances in Theory and Research (pp. 27-55). New York: Plenum Press.
56. Martin, C. L. & Bennett, N. (1996). The role of justice judgments in explaining the relationship between job satisfaction and organizational commitment. Group & Organization Management, 21, 84-104.
57. Miles, J. A. & Greenberg, J. (1993). Using punishment threats to attenuate social loafing effects among swimmers. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 56, 246-265.
58. Mulvey, P. (1992). Predicting pay and benefit satisfaction: Can one model fit all dimensions? Paper presented at the 52nd Annual Meeting of the Academy of management, Las Vegas, August.
59. Pease, P. W., Lind, E. A., & Kanfer, R. (1988). Procedural fairness and work group responses to performance evaluations systems. Social Justice Research, 2, 193-205.
60. Ployhart, R. E. & Ryan, A. M. (1998). Applicantś reactions to the fairness of selection procedures: The effects of positive rule violations and time of measurement. Journal of Applied Psychology, 83, 3-16.
61. Ryan, A. M., Greguras, G. J., & Ployhart, R. E. (1996). Perceived job relatedness of physical ability testing for firefighters: Exploring variations in reactions. Human Performance, 9, 219-240.
62. Scheppard, B. H., Lewicki, R. J., & Minton, J. W. (1992). Organizational Justice: The Search for Fairness in the Workplace. New York: Lexington Books/ Macmillan.
63. Schmitt, D. R. & Marwell, G. (1972). Withdrawal and reward allocation as responses to inequity. Journal of Experimental Society Psychology, 8, 207-221.
64. Shapiro, D. L., Buttner, E. H., & Barry, B. (1994). Explanations: What factors enhance their perceived adequacy? Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 58, 346-368.
65. Steiner, D. D. & Gilliland, S. W. (1996). Fairness reactions to personnel selection techniques in France and the United States. Journal of Applied Psychology, 81, 134-141.
66. Stouffer, S. A., Suchman, E. A., Devinney, L. C., Star, S. A., & Williams, R. M., Jr (1949). The American Soldier: Adjustment during Army Life. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
67. Thibaut, J. & Walker, L. (1975). Procedural Justice: A Psychological Analysis. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
68. Tremblay, M., Sire, B., & Balkin, D. B. (2000). The role of organizational justice in pay and employee benefit satisfaction, and its effects on work attitudes. Group & Organization Management, 25, 269-290.
69. Tremblay, M., Sire, B., & Pelchat, A. (1998). A study of the determinants and the impact of flexibility on employee benefit satisfaction. Human Relations, 51, 667- 688.
70. Truxillo, D. M., Bauer, T. N., & Campion, M. A. (2002). Selection fairness information and applicant reactions: A longitudinal field study. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87, 1020-1031.
71. Truxillo, D. M., Bauer, T. N., & Sanchez, R. J. (2001). Multiple dimensions of procedural justice: Longitudinal effects on selection system fairness and testtaking self-efficacy. International Journal of Selection & Assessment, 9, 336-349.
72. Tyler, T. R. & Bies, R. J. (1990). Beyond formal procedures: The interpersonal context of procedural justice. In: J. S. Carroll (ed.), Applied Social Psychology of Organization Settings (pp. 77-98). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
73. Walster, E., Walster, G. W., & Berscheid, E. (1978). Equity: Theory and Research. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
74. Weiner, N. (1980). Determinants and behavioral consequences of pay satisfaction: A comparison of two models. Personnel Psychology, 33, 741-757.
75. Williams, M. C. (1995). Antecedents of employee benefit level satisfaction: A test of a model. Journal of Management, 21, 1097-1128.
76. Yuchtman, E. (1973). Reward structure, the quality of work environment, and social accounting. In: M. Dierkes & R. A. Bauer (eds), Corporate Social Accounting (pp. 183-190). New York: Praeger.