Outcome measurement for patients receiving hearing aid services

Laryngoscope

Volumn 117, Issue 4, 2007, Pages 610-613

  Cook, Jodi A ^a   Hawkins, David B ^b  

^a MAYO CLINIC   (United States)

^b MAYO CLINIC   (United States)

Author keywords

Audiology; Hearing aids; Patient satisfaction; Quality assurance questionnaire

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DATA ANALYSIS; FEMALE; HEALTH CARE MANAGEMENT; HEALTH CARE PERSONNEL; HEARING AID; HEARING IMPAIRMENT; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUALITY CONTROL; QUALITY OF LIFE; QUESTIONNAIRE;

ADULT; AGED; FEMALE; HEARING AIDS; HEARING DISORDERS; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PATIENT SATISFACTION; QUALITY ASSURANCE, HEALTH CARE; QUESTIONNAIRES; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 34147151663     PISSN: 0023852X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/MLG.0b013e318030452e     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Bentler RA. Effectiveness of directional microphones and noise reduction schemes in hearing aids: a systematic review of the evidence. J Am Acad Audiol 2005;16:473-484.
2. Cox RM. Evidence-based practice in provision of amplification. J Am Acad Audiol 2005;16:419-438.
3. Fabry D. Creating the evidence: lessons from cochlear implants. J Am Acad Audiol 2005;16:515-522.
4. Hawkins DB. Effectiveness of counseling-based adult group aural rehabilitation programs: a systematic review of the evidence. J Am Acad Audiol 2005;16:485-493.
5. Killion MC, Gudmundsen GI. Fitting hearing aids using clinical prefitting speech measures: an evidence-based review. J Am Acad Audiol 2005;16:439-447.
6. Gustav Mueller H. Fitting hearing aids to adults using prescriptive methods: an evidence-based review of effectiveness. J Am Acad Audiol 2005;16:448-460.
7. Gustav Mueller H, Bentler RA. Fitting hearing aids using clinical measures of loudness discomfort levels: an evidence-based review of effectiveness. J Am Acad Audiol 2005;16:461-472.
8. Palmer CV, Grimes AM. Effectiveness of signal processing strategies for the pediatric population: a systematic review of the evidence. J Am Acad Audiol 2005;16:505-514.
9. Sweetow R, Palmer CV. Efficacy of individual auditory training in adults: a systematic review of the evidence. J Am Acad Audiol 2005;16:494-504.
10. Cox RM, Alexander GC. The abbreviated profile of hearing aid benefit. Ear Hear 1995;16:176-186.
11. Cox RM, Alexander GC. Measuring Satisfaction with Amplification in Daily Life: the SADL scale. Ear Hear 1999;20:306-320.
12. Dillon H, James A, Ginis J. Client Oriented Scale of Improvement (COSI) and its relationship to several other measures of benefit and satisfaction provided by hearing aids. J Am Acad Audiol 1997;8:27-43.
13. Cox R, Hyde M, Gatehouse S, et al. Optimal outcome measures, research priorities, and international cooperation. Ear Hear 2000;21 Suppl:106S-115S.
14. Cox RM. Choosing a self-report measure for hearing aid fitting outcomes [Journal: Conference Paper]. Semin Hear 2005;26:149-156.
15. Cox RM, Alexander GC. The International Outcome Inventory for Hearing Aids (IOI-HA): psychometric properties of the English version. Int J Audiol 2002;41:30-35.
16. Cox RM, Alexander GC, Beyer CM. Norms for the international outcome inventory for hearing aids. J Am Acad Audiol 2003;14:403-413.
17. Walden TC, Walden BE. Predicting success with hearing aids in everyday living. J Am Acad Audiol 2004;15:342-352.
18. Kochkin S. MarkeTrak VII: hearing loss population tops 31 million. Hear Rev 2005;12:16-29.