Measuring satisfaction with amplification in daily life: The SADL scale

Ear and Hearing

Volumn 20, Issue 4, 1999, Pages 306-320

  Cox, Robyn M ^a,b,c   Alexander, Genevieve C ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MEMPHIS   (United States)

^b VETERANS AFFAIRS MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^c Memphis Speech and Hearing Center   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; DAILY LIFE ACTIVITY; FEMALE; HEARING AID; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; PATIENT SATISFACTION; SCORING SYSTEM; SELF REPORT;

AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; FEMALE; HEARING AIDS; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PATIENT SATISFACTION; QUESTIONNAIRES;

EID: 0032801958     PISSN: 01960202     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/00003446-199908000-00004     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Allen, M. J., & Yen, W. M. (1979). Introduction to measurement theory. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth Inc.
2. Barcham, L., & Stephens S. D. G. (1980). The use of an open-ended problems questionnaire in auditory rehabilitation. British Journal of Audiology, 14, 49-51.
3. Bentler, R. A., Niebuhr, D. P., Getta, J. P., & Anderson, C. V. (1993). Longitudinal study of hearing aid effectiveness. II: Subjective measures. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 36, 820-831.
4. Brooks, D. N. (1990). Measures for the assessment of hearing aid provision and rehabilitation. British Journal of Audiology, 24, 229-233.
5. Harrowven, R. G., Greener, J. D., & Stephens, S. D. (1987). A double blind cross-over study of high-frequency emphasis hearing aids in individuals with noise-induced hearing loss. British Journal of Audiology, 21, 209-219.
6. Hawes N. A., Durand, R. M., & Clark, S. R. (1985). Understanding desired benefits of a hearing aid: A consumer behavior perspective. Journal of the Academy of Rehabilitative Audiology, 18, 112-122.
7. Humes, L. E., Halling, D., & Coughlin, M. (1996). Reliability and stability of various hearing-aid outcome measures in a group of elderly hearing-aid wearers. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 39, 923-935.
8. Kochkin, S. (1992). Marketrak III identifies key factors in determining consumer satisfaction. Hearing Journal, 45, 39-44.
9. Kochkin, S. (1999). "Baby boomers" spur growth in potential market, but penetration rate declines. Hearing Journal, 52, 33-48.
10. Kricos, P. B., Lesner, S. A., & Sandridge, S. A. (1991). Expectations of older adults regarding the use of hearing aids. Journal of the American Academy of Audiology, 2, 129-133.
11. Levine, N. (1981). The development of an annoyance scale for community noise assessment. Journal of Sound and Vibration, 74, 265-279.
12. May, A. E., Upfold, L. J., & Battaglia, J. A. (1990). The advantages and disadvantages of ITC, ITE and BTE hearing aids: Diary and interview reports from elderly users. British Journal of Audiology, 24, 301-309.
13. Oja, G., & Schow, R. (1984). Hearing aid evaluation based on measures of benefit, use, and satisfaction. Ear and Hearing, 5, 77-86.
14. Stock, A., Fichtl, E., & Heller, O. (1997). Comparing determinants of hearing instrument satisfaction in Germany and the United States. Hearing Review Supplement, High Performance Hearing Solutions, 2, 40-46.
15. Surr, R., & Hawkins, D. B. (1988). New hearing aid users' perception of the "hearing aid effect." Ear and Hearing, 9, 113-118.
16. Welsh, D. S. (1994). How do you know if your customers are satisfied? Hearing Instruments, 45, 17-19.