Choosing a self-report measure for hearing aid fitting outcomes

Seminars in Hearing

Volumn 26, Issue 3, 2005, Pages 149-156

  Cox, Robyn M ^a,b  

^a Memphis Speech and Hearing Center   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MEMPHIS   (United States)

Author keywords

Hearing aid; Hearing loss; Outcomes; Questionnaire; Subjective

Indexed keywords

COCHLEA PROSTHESIS; CONFERENCE PAPER; COUNSELING; HEARING AID; HEARING LOSS; HUMAN; MEASUREMENT; OUTCOMES RESEARCH; QUESTIONNAIRE; RELIABILITY; SELF REPORT; TASK PERFORMANCE;

EID: 24944454233     PISSN: 07340451     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1055/s-2005-916378     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (21)

1. Noble W. Self-Assessment of Hearing and Related Functions. London: Whurr Publishers; 1998
2. Bentler RA, Kramer SE. Guidelines for choosing a self-report outcome measure. Ear Hear 2000;21:37S-49S
3. Walden BE, Demorest ME, Hepler EL. Self-report approach to assessing benefit derived from amplification. J Speech Hear Res 1984;27:49-56
4. Mueller HG, Palmer CV. The Profile of Aided Loudness: a new "PAL" for '98. Hear J 1998;51:10-19
5. Kramer SE, Kapteyn TS, Festen JM, Tobi H. Factors in subjective hearing disability. Audiology 1995;34:167-199
6. Weinstein BE, Ventry IM. Audiometric correlates of the Hearing Handicap Inventory for the Elderly. J Speech Hear Disord 1983;48:379-384
7. Cox RM, Alexander GC. Expectations about hearing aids and their relationship to fitting outcome. J Am Acad Audiol 2000;11:368-382
8. Cox RM, Alexander GC, Beyer CM. Norms for the International Outcome Inventory for Hearing Aids. J Am Acad Audiol 2003;14:404-413
9. Thornton A, Raffin MJ. Speech discrimination scores modeled as a binomial variable. J Speech Hear Res 1978;21:507-518
10. Cox RM, Alexander GC. The Abbreviated Profile of Hearing Aid Benefit. Ear Hear 1995;16:176-186
11. Dillon H, James A, Ginis J. The Client Oriented Scale of Improvement (COSI) and its relationship to several other measures of benefit and satisfaction provided by hearing aids. J Am Acad Audiol 1997;8:27-43
12. Cox RM, Alexander GC. Measuring satisfaction with amplification in daily life: the SADL scale. Ear Hear 1999;20:306-320
13. Dillon H, So M. Incentives and obstacles to the routine use of outcomes measures by clinicians. Ear Hear 2000;21:2S-6S
14. Cox RM. Assessment of subjective outcome of hearing aid fitting: getting the client's point of view. Int J Audiol 2003;42(suppl 1):S90-S96
15. Dillon H. Shortened Hearing Aid Performance Inventory for the Elderly (SHAPIE): a statistical approach. Aust J Audiol 1994;16:37-48
16. Cox RM. Administration and application of the APHAB. Hear J 1997;50:32-48
17. Ventry IM, Weinstein BE. The Hearing Handicap Inventory for the Elderly: a new tool. Ear Hear 1982;3:128-134
18. Malinoff RL, Weinstein BE. Measurement of hearing aid benefit in the elderly. Ear Hear 1989;10:354-356
19. Cox RM, Hyde M, Gatehouse S, et al. Optimal outcome measures, research priorities, and international cooperation. Ear Hear 2000;21:106S-115S
20. Kramer SE, Goverts ST, Dreschler WA, Boymans M, Festen JM. The International Outcome Inventory for Hearing Aids (IOI-HA): results from the Netherlands. Int J Audiol 2002;41:36-41
21. Stephens D. The International Outcome Inventory for Hearing Aids (IOI-HA) and its relationship to the Client Oriented Scale of Improvement (COSI). Int J Audiol 2002;41:42-47