Fitting hearing aids using clinical measures of loudness discomfort levels: An evidence-based review of effectiveness

Journal of the American Academy of Audiology

Volumn 16, Issue 7, 2005, Pages 461-472

  Mueller, H Gustav ^a   Bentler, Ruth A ^b  

^a VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF IOWA   (United States)

Author keywords

Evidence; Hearing aid; Loudness; Loudness discomfort; Maximum output; OSPL90; Output

Indexed keywords

CLINICAL ASSESSMENT; CLINICAL EFFECTIVENESS; CLINICAL PRACTICE; CONTROLLED STUDY; EVIDENCE BASED PRACTICE; HEALTH SURVEY; HEARING AID; HUMAN; LOUDNESS; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REVIEW; HEARING; HEARING LOSS; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; PHYSIOLOGY; PROSTHESIS; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

HEARING AIDS; HEARING LOSS; HUMANS; LOUDNESS PERCEPTION; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PROSTHESIS FITTING; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 33644807693     PISSN: 10500545     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3766/jaaa.16.7.6     Document Type: Review

References (49)

1. American National Standards Institute. (1996) American National Standard Specification for Audiometers (ANSI S3.6-1996). New York: ANSI.
2. Bentler R, Cooley L. (2001) An examination of several characteristics that affect the prediction of OSPL90. Ear Hear 22:3-20.
3. Bentler RA, Nelson JA. (2001) Effect of spectral shaping on loudness discomfort. J Am Acad Audiol 12:431-437.
4. Bentler RA, Niebuhr DP, Getta JP, Anderson CV. (1993) Longitudinal study of hearing aid effectiveness: objective measures. J Speech Hear Res 36:820-831.
5. Bentler RA, Pavlovic CV. (1989) Comparison of discomfort levels obtained with pure tones and multitone complexes. J Acoust Soc Am 86:126-132.
6. Bess FH. (1995) Evidence-based audiology. Am J Audiol 4:5.
7. Bratt GW, Rosenfeld MAL, Poek BF, Rang J, Williams DW, Larson V. (2002) Coupler and real-ear measurement of hearing aid gain and output in the NIDCD/VA hearing aid clinical trial. Ear Hear 23:308-324.
8. Byrne D, Dirks D. (1996) Effects of acclimatization and deprivation on non-speech auditory abilities. Ear Hear 17:298-378.
9. Carhart R. (1947) Selection of hearing aids. Arch Otolaryngol 44:1-18.
10. Cox RM. (1995) Using loudness data for hearing aid selection: the IHAFF approach. Hear J 48:10,39-44.
11. Cox RM, Gray GA. (2001) Verifying loudness perception after hearing aid fitting. Am J Audiol 10:91-98.
12. Davis H, Hudgins C, Marquis R, Nichols R, Peterson G, Ross D, Stevens S. (1946) The selection of hearing aids. Laryngoscope 56:85-115.
13. Dillon H. (2001) Hearing Aids. New York: Thieme.
14. Dillon H, Byrne D, Brewer S, Katsch R, Ching T, Keidser G. (1999) NAL-NL1 Version 1.1 User Manual. Chatswood, NSW: National Acoustic Laboratories.
15. Dillon H, Chew R, Deans M. (1984). Loudness discomfort level measurements and their implications for design and fitting of hearing aids. Aust J Audiol 6(2):73-79.
16. Dillon H, Storey L. (1998) The National Acoustic Laboratories' procedure for selecting the saturation sound pressure level of hearing aids: theoretical derivation. Ear Hear 19:255-266.
17. Elberling C. (1999) Loudness scaling revisited. J Am Acad Audiol 10:248-260.
18. Filion P, Margolis R. (1992) Comparison of clinical and real-life judgments of loudness discomfort. J Am Acad Audiol 3:193-199.
19. Franks JR, Beckmann NJ. (1985) Rejection of hearing aids: attitudes of a geriatric sample. Ear Hear 6:161-166.
20. Hawkins D, Ball T, Beasley H, Cooper W. (1992) Comparison of SSPL90 selection procedures. J Am Acad Audiol 3:46-50.
21. Hawkins D, Beck L, Bratt G, Fabry D, Mueller HG, Stelmachowicz P. (1991) The Vanderbilt/Department of Veterans Affairs 1990 Conference consensus statement: recommended components of a hearing aid selection procedure for adults. Audiol Today 3:16-18.
22. Hawkins DB, Walden BE, Montgomery A, Prosek RA. (1987) Description and validation of the LDL procedure designed to select SSPL90. Ear Hear 8:162-169.
23. Humes LE, Wilson DL, Humes AC. (2003) Examination of differences between successful and unsuccessful elderly hearing aid candidates matched for age, hearing loss and gender. Int J Audiol 42(7):432-441.
24. Jenstad LM, Van Tasell DJ, Ewert C. (2003) Hearing aid troubleshooting based on patients' descriptions. J Am Acad Audiol 14:347-360
25. Kamm C, Dirks D, Mickey M. (1978) Effect of sensorineural hearing loss on loudness discomfort level and most comfortable loudness judgments. J Speech Hear Res 21:668-681.
26. Kochkin S. (2000) MarkeTrak V: consumer satisfaction revisited. Hear J 53:38-55.
27. Kochkin S. (2002) 10-year customer satisfaction trends in the US hearing instrument market. Hear Rev 10(9):14,18-25, 26.
28. Kochkin S. (2003) Isolating the impact of the volume control on customer satisfaction. Hear Rev 10(1):26-35.
29. Martin F, Champlin C, Chambers J. (1998) Seventh survey of audiometric practices in the United States. J Am Acad Audiol 9:95-104.
30. Mueller HG. (1999) Just make it audible, comfortable and loud but okay. Hear J 52:10-17.
31. Mueller HG. (2003) Fitting test protocols. Hear J 56(10):19-26.
32. Mueller HG. (2004) LDLs and probe-mic measures. Hear J 57(8):10.
33. Mueller HG, Bentler RA. (1994) Measurements of TD: how loud is allowed? Hear J 47(1):10,42-46.
34. Mueller HG, Bentler RA. (2002) How loud is allowed? Hear J 52(1):10-17
35. Mueller HG, Bright KE. (1994) Selection and verification of maximum output. In: Valente M, ed. Strategies for Selecting and Verifying Hearing Aid Fittings. New York: Thieme Medical Publishers.
36. Mueller HG, Hornsby B. (2002) Selection, verification and validation of maximum output. In: Valente M, ed. Strategies for Selecting and Verifying Hearing Aid Fittings. New York: Thieme Medical Publishers: 23-66.
37. Mueller HG, Powers TA. (2001) Considerations of auditory acclimatization in the prescriptive fitting of hearing aids. Semin Hear 22:103-124.
38. Mueller HG, Strouse A. (1995) Survey shows that user judgment remains dispensers' favorite fitting procedure. Hear J 48:25-31.
39. Munro K, Patel R. (1998) Are clinical measurements of uncomfortable loudness levels a valid indicator of real-world auditory discomfort? Br J Audiol 32:287-293.
40. Palmer CP, Lindley G. (1998) Reliability of the Contour Test in a population of adults with hearing loss. J Am Acad Audiol 9:209-215.
41. Pascoe D. (1988) Clinical measurements of the auditory range and their relation to formulas for hearing aid gain. In: Jensen J, ed. Hearing Aid Fittings: Theoretical and Practical Views. 13th Danavox Symposium. Copenhagen: Stongaard Jensen, 129-152.
42. Ricketts TA, Bentler RA. (1996) The effect of test signal type and bandwidth on the categorical scaling of loudness. J Acoust Soc Am 99:2281-2287.
43. Saunders GH, Morgan DE. (2003) Impact on hearing aid targets of measuring thresholds in dB HL versus dB SPL. Int J Audiol 4:319-326.
44. Seewald R, Cornelisse L, Ramji K, Sinclair S, Moodie K, Jamieson D. (1997) A Software Implementation of the Desired Sensation Level (DSL[i/0]) Method for Fitting Linear Gain and Wide Dynamic Range Compression Hearing Instruments: Version 4. 1a. User's Manual. London: University of Western Ontario.
45. Skinner M. (1988) Hearing Aid Evaluation. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
46. Storey L, Dillon H, Yeend I, Wigney D. (1998) The National Acoustic Laboratories' procedure for selecting the saturation sound pressure level of hearing aids: experimental validation. Ear Hear 19:267-279.
47. Valente M, Bentler R, Kaplan H, Seewald R, Trine T, Van Vliet D. (1998) Guidelines for hearing aid fitting for adults. Am J Audiol 7:5-13.
48. Watson L, Tolan T. (1949) Hearing Tests and Hearing Instruments. Baltimore: Williams and Wilkins.
49. Wiley TL, Stoppenbach DT, Feldhake LJ, Moss KA, Thordardottir ET. (1995) Audiologic practices: what is popular versus what is supported by the evidence. Am J Audiol 4(1):26-34.