The impact of vision impairment questionnaire: An assessment of its domain structure using confirmatory factor analysis and rasch analysis

Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science

Volumn 48, Issue 3, 2007, Pages 1001-1006

  Lamoureux, Ecosse L ^a   Pallant, Julie F ^b   Pesudovs, Konrad ^c   Rees, Gwyn ^a   Hassell, Jennifer B ^a   Keeffe, Jill E ^a,d  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MELBOURNE   (Australia)

^b SWINBURNE UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Australia)

^c FLINDERS MEDICAL CENTRE   (Australia)

^d VISION COOPERATIVE RESEARCH CENTRE   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; COMPUTER PROGRAM; CONFIRMATORY FACTOR ANALYSIS; CONTROLLED STUDY; EMOTION; FACTORIAL ANALYSIS; FEMALE; HUMAN; IMPACT OF VISION IMPAIRMENT QUESTIONNAIRE; INTERNAL CONSISTENCY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUESTIONNAIRE; RASCH ANALYSIS; READING; RELIABILITY; STATISTICAL SIGNIFICANCE; VALIDATION STUDY; DAILY LIFE ACTIVITY; HEALTH SURVEY; MIDDLE AGED; PATIENT; PSYCHOMETRY; STATISTICAL MODEL; STATISTICS; VISUAL DISORDER;

ACTIVITIES OF DAILY LIVING; ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; FEMALE; HEALTH STATUS INDICATORS; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MODELS, STATISTICAL; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT (HEALTH CARE); PSYCHOMETRICS; QUESTIONNAIRES; VISION, LOW; VISUALLY IMPAIRED PERSONS;

EID: 34047249242     PISSN: 01460404     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1167/iovs.06-0361     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Weih LM, Hassell JB, Keeffe JE. Assessment of the impact of vision impairment. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2002;43:927-935.
2. Lamoureux EL, Hassell JB, Keeffe JE. The determinants of participation in activities of daily living in people with impaired vision. Am J Ophthalmol. 2004;137:265-270.
3. Lamoureux EL, Hassell JB, Keeffe JE. The impact of diabetic retinopathy on participation in daily living. Arch Ophthalmol. 2004;122:84-88.
4. Hassell JB, Lamoureux EL, Keeffe JE. Impact of age-related macular degeneration on quality of life. Br J Ophthalmol. 2006;90:593-596.
5. Noë G, Ferraro J, Lamoureux E, Rait J, Keeffe JE. Associations between glaucomatous visual field loss and participation in activities of daily living. Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2003;31:482-486.
6. Lamoureux E, Pallant J, Pesudovs K, Hassell J, Keeffe J. The Impact of Vision Impairment Questionnaire: an evaluation of its measurement properties using Rasch analysis. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2006;47:4732-4741.
7. Norquist JM, Fitzpatrick R, Dawson J, Jenkinson C. Comparing alternative Rasch-based methods vs raw scores in measuring change in health. Med Care. 2004;42:125-136.
8. Pesudovs K, Garamendi E, Keeves JP, Elliott DB. The Activities of Daily Vision Scale for cataract surgery outcomes: re-evaluating validity with Rasch analysis. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2003;44:2892-2899.
9. Fisher WP Jr, Eubanks R, Marier RL. Equating the MOS SF36 and the LSU HSI Physical Functioning Scales. J Outcome Meas. 1997;1:329-362.
10. Fisher WPJ. The Rasch debate: validity and revolution in educational measurement. In: Wilson M, ed. Objective Measurement: Theory into Practice. Norwood, NJ: Ablex; 1994:36-72.
11. Massof RW. The measurement of vision disability. Optom Vis Sci. 2002;79:516-552.
12. Wright BD, Linacre JM. Observations are always ordinal, measurements must be interval. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1989;70:857-860.
13. White LJ, Velozo CA. The use of Rasch measurement to improve the Oswestry classification scheme. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2002;83:822-831.
14. Raczek AE, Ware JE, Bjorner JB, et al. Comparison of Rasch and summated rating scales constructed from SF-36 physical functioning items in seven countries: results from the IQOLA Project. International Quality of Life Assessment. J Clin Epidemiol. 1998;51:1203-1214.
15. Pesudovs K, Garamendi E, Elliott DB. The Quality of Life Impact of Refractive Correction (QIRC) Questionnaire: development and validation. Optom Vis Sci. 2004;81:769-777.
16. Ware J, Kosinski M, Keller S. SF-12: How to Score the SF-12 Physical and Mental Health Summary Scales. Lincoln, RI: Quality Metric; 1998.
17. Andrich D, Lyne A, Sheridan B, Luo G. RUMM 2020. Perth, Australia: RUMM Laboratory; 2003.
18. Linacre J. A User's Guide to Winsteps: Rasch-Model Computer Program. Chicago: Mesa Press; 2002.
19. Massof RW, Hsu CT, Baker FH, et al. Visual disability variables. II: The difficulty of tasks for a sample of low-vision patients. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2005;86:954-967.
20. Hair JF, Black WC, Babin BJ, Anderson RE, Tatham RL. Multivariate Data Analysis. 6th ed. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall; 2005.
21. Byrne B. Structural Equation Modeling with AMOS: Basic Concepts, Applications, and Programming. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates; 2001.
22. Bentler PM. Comparative fit indexes in structural models. Psychol Bull. 1990;107:238-246.
23. Kline R. Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modeling. 2nd ed. New York: Guilford Press; 2005.
24. Mallinson T, Stelmack J, Velozo C. A comparison of the separation ratio and coefficient alpha in the creation of minimum item sets. Med Care. 2004;42:117-124.
25. Smith EV. Detecting and evaluation the impact of multidimensionality using item fit statistics and principal component analysis of residuals. J Appl Meas. 2002;3:205-231.
26. Nunnally J. Psychometric Theory. New York: McGraw-Hill; 1978.
27. Massof RW. Application of stochastic measurement models to visual function rating scale questionnaires. Ophthalmic Epidemiol. 2005;12:103-124.
28. Tabachnick B, Fidell L. Using Multivariate Statistics. 4th ed. New York: HarperCollins; 2001.
29. McHorney CA, Haley SM, Ware JE, Jr. Evaluation of the MOS SF-36 Physical Functioning Scale (PF-10): II. Comparison of relative precision using Likert and Rasch scoring methods. J Clin Epidemiol. 1997;50:451-461.
30. Fitzpatrick R, Norquist JM, Jenkinson C, et al. A comparison of Rasch with Likert scoring to discriminate between patients' evaluations of total hip replacement surgery. Qual life Res. 2004;13:331-338.
31. Hays RD, Morales LS, Reise SP. Item response theory and health outcomes measurement in the 21st century. Med Care. 2000;38:1128-1142.
32. Hart P, Stevenson M, Montgomery A, Muldrew K, Chakravarthy U. Further validation of the Daily Living Tasks Dependent on Vision: identification of domains. Br J Ophthalmol. 2005:1127-1130.
33. Stelmack J, Szlyk J, Stelmack T, et al. Use of Rasch person-item map in exploratory data analysis: a clinical perspective. J Rehabil Res Dev. 2004;41:233-241.