Further validation of the Daily Living Tasks Dependent on Vision: Identification of domains

British Journal of Ophthalmology

Volumn 89, Issue 9, 2005, Pages 1127-1130

  Hart, Patricia M ^a   Stevenson, M R ^b   Montgomery, A M ^a   Muldrew, K A ^a   Chakravarthy, U ^a  

^a QUEEN'S UNIVERSITY BELFAST   (United Kingdom)

^b ROYAL GROUP OF HOSPITALS   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; DAILY LIFE ACTIVITY; DAILY LIVING TASK DEPENDENT ON VISION; DARK ADAPTATION; FEMALE; HUMAN; INTERVIEW; LIGHT ADAPTATION; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; OPHTHALMOLOGY; PERIPHERAL VISION; PRINCIPAL COMPONENT ANALYSIS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUESTIONNAIRE; VALIDATION PROCESS; VISION;

ACTIVITIES OF DAILY LIVING; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; DISABILITY EVALUATION; FEMALE; HEALTH STATUS INDICATORS; HUMANS; MACULAR DEGENERATION; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PRINCIPAL COMPONENT ANALYSIS; QUESTIONNAIRES; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; VISUALLY IMPAIRED PERSONS;

EID: 24044475884     PISSN: 00071161     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1136/bjo.2004.059683     Document Type: Article

References (14)

1. Hart PM, Chakravarthy U, Stevenson MR, et al. A vision specific functional index for use in patients with age related macular degeneration. Br J Ophthalmol 1999;83:1115-20.
2. McClure ME, Hart PM, Jackson AJ, et al. Macular degeneration: do conventional measurements of impaired visual function equate with visual disability? Br J Ophthalmol 2000;84:244-50.
3. Hart PM, Chakravarthy U, Mackenzie G, et al. Visual outcomes in the subfoveal radiotherapy study. Arch Ophthalmol 2002;120:1029-37.
4. Haymes SA, Johnston AW, Heyes AD. The development of the Melbourne low-vision ADL index: a measure of vision disability. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2001;42:1215-25.
5. McCullagh P. Regression models for ordinal data. J Roy Stat Soc, 1980;B, 42:109-42.
6. Massof RW, Rubin GS. Visual function assessment questionnaires. Surv Ophthalmol 2001;45:531-548.
7. Spector W, Fleishman J. Combining activities of daily living with instrumental activities of daily living to measure functional disability. J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Svi 1998;53:S46-57.
8. Turano KA, Massof RW, Quigley HA. A self-assessment instrument designed for measuring independent mobility in RP patients: generalizability to glaucoma patients. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sc 2002;43:2874-81.
9. Guymer RH, Gross-Jendroska M, Owens SL, et al. Laser treatment in subjects with high-risk clinical features of age-related macular degeneration. Posterior pole appearance and retinal function. Arch Ophthalmol 1997;115:595-603.
10. Mangione CM, Phillips RS, Seddon JM, et al. Development of the Activities of Daily Vision Scale. Medical Care 1992;30:1111-26.
11. Frost NA, Sparrow JM, Durant JS, et al. Development of a questionnaire for measurement of vision-related quality of life. Ophthalmic Epidemiol 1998;5:185-210.
12. Mangione CM, Berry S, Spritzer K, et al. Identifying the content area for the 51-item National Eye Institute Visual Function Questionnaire: results from focus groups with visually impaired persons. Arch Ophthalmol 1998;116:227-33.
13. Ware JE, Sherbourne CD. The MOS 36 item short form health survey (SF36). Conceptual framework and item selection. Medical Care 1992;30:473-83.
14. Stevenson MR, Hart PM, Montgomery AM, et al. Reduced vision in older adults with age-related macular degeneration interferes with ability to care for self and impairs role as carer. Br J Ophthalmol 2004;88:1125-30.