Associations between glaucomatous visual field loss and participation in activities of daily living

Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology

Volumn 31, Issue 6, 2003, Pages 482-486

  Noe, Geertje ^a   Ferraro, John ^a   Lamoureux, Ecosse ^a   Rait, Julian ^a   Keeffe, Jill E ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MELBOURNE   (Australia)

Author keywords

Esterman; Glaucoma; Quality of life; Visual field; Visual impairment

Indexed keywords

ANTIGLAUCOMA AGENT;

ADULT; AGED; ANALYZER; ARTICLE; AUSTRALIA; BINOCULAR VISION; BURNING SENSATION; CONTRAST SENSITIVITY; DAILY LIFE ACTIVITY; DISEASE ASSOCIATION; DRY EYE; EMOTION; GLAUCOMA; HUMAN; LEISURE; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MOBILIZATION; OCULAR PRURITUS; OPEN ANGLE GLAUCOMA; QUESTIONNAIRE; VISUAL ACUITY; VISUAL FIELD DEFECT; VISUAL IMPAIRMENT; VISUAL SYSTEM EXAMINATION;

ACTIVITIES OF DAILY LIVING; ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; CONTRAST SENSITIVITY; DISABILITY EVALUATION; FEMALE; GLAUCOMA; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; QUESTIONNAIRES; VISION DISORDERS; VISUAL ACUITY; VISUAL FIELDS; VISUALLY IMPAIRED PERSONS;

EID: 0346368396     PISSN: 14426404     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1046/j.1442-9071.2003.00712.x     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Foster PJ, Johnson GJ. Glaucoma in China: How big is the problem? Br J Ophthalmol 2001; 85: 1277-82.
2. Bassi CJ, Galanis JC, Meltzer MI. Binocular visual impairment. Ophthalmology 1991; 98: 1406-11.
3. Jampel HD. Glaucoma patients assessment of their visual function and quality of life. Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc 2001; 99: 301-17.
4. Sherwood MB, Garcia-Siekavizza A. Glaucoma's impact on quality of life and its relation to clinical indicators. Ophthalmology 1998; 105: 561-6.
5. Nelson P, Aspinal P, O'Brien C. Patients' perception of visual impairment in glaucoma: A pilot study. Br J Ophthalmol 1999; 83: 546-22.
6. Ramrattan RS, Wolfs RCW, Panda-Jonas S et al. Prevalence and causes of visual field loss in the elderly and associations with impairment in daily functioning. Arch Ophthalmol 2001; 119: 1788-94.
7. Keeffe JE, Lovie-Kitchin JE, Taylor HR. Referral to low vision rehabilitation services by ophthalmologists. Aust NZ J Ophthalmol 1996; 24: 207-14.
8. Taylor HR, Keeffe JE. World blindness: A 21st century perspective. Br J Ophthalmol 2001; 85: 261-6.
9. Crabb DP, Viswanathan AC, McNaught AI et al. Simulating binocular visual field status in glaucoma. Br J Ophthalmol 1998; 82: 1236-41.
10. Mills R, Drance SM. Esterman disability rating. Ophthalmology 1986; 93: 371-8.
11. Esterman B. Functional scoring of the binocular field. Ophthalmology 1982; 89: 1226-34.
12. Viswanathan AC, McNaught AI, Poinoosawmy D et al. Severity and stability of glaucoma. Arch Ophthalmol 1999; 117: 450-54.
13. Weih L, Hassell JB, Keeffe JE. Assessment of the impact of vision impairment. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2002; 43: 927-35.
14. Lee BL, Gutierrez P, Gordon M et al. The Glaucoma Symptom Scale. A brief index of glaucoma-specific symptoms. Arch Ophthalmol 1998; 116: 861-6.
15. Parrish RK, Gedde SJ, Scott IU et al. Visual function and quality of life among patients with glaucoma. Arch Ophthalmol 1997; 104: 334-42.
16. Gutierrez P, Wilson R, Johnson C et al. Influence of glaucomatous visual field loss on health related quality of life. Arch Ophthalmol 1997; 115: 777-84.
17. Mills RP. Correlation of quality of life with clinical symptoms and signs at the time of glaucoma diagnosis. Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc 1998; 96: 753-812.
18. Hassell JB, Weih LM, Keeffe JE. A measure of handicap for low vision rehabilitation: The impact of vision impairment profile. Clin Experiment Ophthalmol 2000; 28: 156-61.
19. Jampel HD, Friedman DS, Quigley H et al. Correlation of the binocular visual field with patients' assessment of vision. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2002; 43: 1059-67.
20. Turano KA, Rubin GS, Quigley HA. Mobility performance in glaucoma. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1999; 40: 2803-9.