Fabrication of polymer neural probes with sub-cellular features for reduced tissue encapsulation

Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology - Proceedings

Volumn , Issue , 2006, Pages 4606-4609

  Seymour, John P ^a,b   Kipke, Daryl R ^a,b  

^a IEEE   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

INTRACORTICAL MICROELECTRODES; NEURAL PROBES; SUB CELLULAR STRUCTURES; TISSUE ENCAPSULATION;

ENCAPSULATION; IMPLANTS (SURGICAL); NEUROLOGY; ORGANIC POLYMERS; PROSTHETICS; TISSUE;

MICROELECTRODES;

BIOMATERIAL; PARYLENE; POLYMER; XYLENE;

ANIMAL; ARTICLE; CHEMISTRY; ELECTRODE IMPLANT; EQUIPMENT; EQUIPMENT DESIGN; IMMUNOHISTOCHEMISTRY; MALE; MATERIALS TESTING; METHODOLOGY; MICROELECTRODE; NEOCORTEX; NERVE CELL; PATHOLOGY; RAT; SCANNING ELECTRON MICROSCOPY; SPRAGUE DAWLEY RAT;

ANIMALS; BIOCOMPATIBLE MATERIALS; ELECTRODES, IMPLANTED; EQUIPMENT DESIGN; IMMUNOHISTOCHEMISTRY; MALE; MATERIALS TESTING; MICROELECTRODES; MICROSCOPY, ELECTRON, SCANNING; NEOCORTEX; NEURONS; POLYMERS; RATS; RATS, SPRAGUE-DAWLEY; XYLENES;

EID: 34047112871     PISSN: 05891019     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1109/IEMBS.2006.260528     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (12)

1. Sanders, J.E., et al., Small fiber diameter fibro-porous meshes: Tissue response sensitivity to fiber spacing. J Biomed Mater Res A, 2005. 72A(3): p. 335-42.
2. Sanders, J.E., C.E. Stiles, and C.L. Hayes, Tissue response to single-polymer fibers of varying diameters: evaluation of fibrous encapsulation and macrophage density. J Biomed Mater Res, 2000. 52(1): p. 231-7.
3. Stensaas, S.S. and L.J. Stensaas, The reaction of the cerebral cortex to chronically implanted plastic needles. Acta Neuropathol (Berl), 1976. 35(3): p. 187-203.
4. Biran, R., D.C. Martin, and P.A. Tresco, Neuronal cell loss accompanies the brain tissue response to chronically implanted silicon microelectrode arrays. Exp Neurol, 2005. 195(1): p. 115-26.
5. Szarowski, D.H., et al., Brain responses to micro-machined silicon devices. Brain Res, 2003. 983(1-2): p. 23-35.
6. Liu, X., et al., Stability of the interface between neural tissue and chronically implanted intracortical microelectrodes. IEEE Transactions on Rehabilitation Engineering, 1999. 7(3): p. 315-26.
7. Ludwig, K.A., et al., Chronic neural recordings using silicon microelectrode arrays electrochemically deposited with a poly(3,4- ethylenedioxythiophene) (PEDOT) film. J Neural Eng, 2006. 3(1): p. 59-70.
8. Rousche, P.J. and R.A. Normann, Chronic recording capability of the Utah Intracortical Electrode Array in cat sensory cortex. Journal of Neuroscience Methods, 1998. 82(1): p. 1-15.
9. Polikov, V.S., P.A. Tresco, and W.M. Reichert, Response of brain tissue to chronically implanted neural electrodes. J Neurosci Methods, 2005. 148(1): p. 1-18.
10. Chen, C.S., et al., Geometric control of cell life and death. Science, 1997. 276(5317): p. 1425-8.
11. Chen, C.S., J. Tan, and J. Tien, Mechanotransduction at cell-matrix and cell-cell contacts. Annu Rev Biomed Eng, 2004. 6: p. 275-302.
12. Vetter, R.J., et al., Chronic neural recording using silicon-sub strate microelectrode arrays implanted in cerebral cortex. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng, 2004. 51(6): p. 896-904.