Managing IT-enabled transformation in the public sector: A case study on e-government in South Korea

Government Information Quarterly

Volumn 24, Issue 2, 2007, Pages 338-352

  Kim, Hyun Jeong ^a   Pan, Gary ^b   Pan, Shan Ling ^c  

^a Inha University   (South Korea)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MELBOURNE   (Australia)

^c NATIONAL UNIVERSITY OF SINGAPORE   (Singapore)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 33947710037     PISSN: 0740624X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.giq.2006.09.007     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. ACCENTURE, 2004. The government executive leadership: eGovernment leadership-High performance, maximum value. Retrieved 14th January 2006, from www.accenture.com
2. Aichholzer G., and Schmutzer R. Organizational challenges to the development of electronic government. Proceedings from 11th International Workshop on Database and Expert Systems Application, London (2000) 379-383
3. Beynon-Davies P. Information systems "Failures": The case study of the London ambulance service's computer aided dispatch project. European Journal of Information Systems 4 (1995) 171-184
4. Bozeman B., and Kingsley G. Risk culture in public and private organizations. Public Administration Review 58 2 (1998) 109-118
5. Bucy E., and Gregson K. Media participation: A legitimizing mechanism of mass democracy. New Media and Society 3 3 (2001) 357-380
6. Child J. Information technology, organisation, and the response to strategic challenges. California Management Review 30 1 (1987) 33-50
7. Coleman S., Taylor J., and Van de Donk W. Parliament in the age of the Internet (1999), Oxford University Press, Oxford
8. Cooper R., and Zmud R. Information technology implementation research: A technological diffusion approach. Management Science 36 2 (1990) 123-139
9. Cule P., and Robey D. A dual-motor, constructive process model of organizational transition. Organizational Studies 25 2 (2004) 229-260
10. Day G. The capabilities of market-driven organizations. Journal of Marketing 58 4 (1994) 37-53
11. Devadoss P., Pan S., and Huang J. Structural analysis of e-government initiatives: A case study of SCO. Decision Support Systems 34 (2002) 253-269
12. Doz Y., and Prahalad C. Process model of strategic redirection in large complex firms: The case of multinational corporations. In: Pettigrew A. (Ed). The Management of Strategic Change (1987), Basil Blackwell, Oxford 28-54
13. Ebrahim Z., and Irani Z. E-government adoption: Architecture and barriers. Business Process Management Journal 11 5 (2005) 589-612
14. Hamel G., and Prahalad C. Competing for the future (1994), Harvard Business School Press, Boston
15. Ho A. Reinventing local governments and the e-government initiative. Public Administration Review 62 4 (2002) 434-444
16. Hofstedt G. Cultures and organizations: Software of the mind (1991), McGraw Hill, London
17. Irani Z., Love p., and Montazemi A. Call for papers: Special issue on e-government: Past, present and future. European Journal of Information Systems (2006)
18. Jarvenpaa S., and Leidner D. An information company in Mexico: Extending the RBV of the firm to a developing country context. Information Systems Research 9 4 (1998) 342-361
19. Kawalek P., and Wastell D. Pursuing radical transformation in information age government: Case studies using the SPRINT methodology. Journal of Global Information Management 13 (2005) 79-101
20. Keil M., Tan B., Wei K., Saarinen T., Tuunainen V., and Wassenaar A. A cross-cultural study on escalation of commitment behavior in software projects. MIS Quarterly 24 2 (2000) 299-324
21. Klein H., and Meyers M. A set of principles for conducting and evaluating interpretive field studies in information systems. MIS Quarterly 23 1 (1999) 67-94
22. Langley A. Strategies for theorizing from process data. Academy of Management Review 24 4 (1999) 691-710
23. Lembke S., and Wilson M. Putting the "team" into teamwork: Alternative theoretical contributions for contemporary management practice. Human Relations 51 7 (1998) 927-944
24. Lovell R. Managing change in the new public sector (1995), Longman, London
25. Lyytinen K., and Robey D. Learning failure in information systems development. Information Systems Journal 9 2 (1999) 85-101
26. Moon M. The evolution of e-government among municipalities: Rhetoric or reality?. Public Administration Review 62 4 (2002) 424-433
27. Moon M., and Bretschneider S. Does the perception of red tape constrain IT innovativeness in organizations? Unexpected results from simultaneous equation model and implications. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 11 3 (2002) 327-352
28. Orlikowski W. CASE tools as organizational change: Investigating incremental and radical changes in systems development management. Information Systems Quarterly 17 3 (1993) 309-340
29. Orlikowski W., and Robey D. Information technology and the structuring of organizations. Information Systems Research 2 2 (1991) 143-169
30. Pan G., Pan S., and Devadoss P. E-government capabilities and crisis management: Lessons from combating SARS in Singapore. MIS Quarterly Executive 4 4 (2005) 385-397
31. Pan G., Pan S., Newman M., and Flynn D. Escalation and de-escalation of commitment to information technology projects: A commitment transformation analysis of an e-government project. Information Systems Journal 16 1 (2006) 3-21
32. Prahalad C., and Oosterveld J. Transforming internal governance: The challenge for multinationals. Sloan Management Review 40 3 (1999) 31-39
33. Rainey G. Implementing and managerial creativity: A study of the development of client-centric units in human service programs. In: Palumbo D., and Calista D. (Eds). Implementation and the policy process: Opening up the black box (1990), Greenwood, Westport, CT 89-106
34. Robey D., and Boudreau M. Accounting for the contradictory organizational consequences of information technology: Theoretical directions and methodological implications. Information Systems Research 10 2 (1999) 167-185
35. Robey D., and Sahay S. Transforming work through information technology: A comparative case study of geographic information systems in county governments. Information Systems Research 7 1 (1996) 63-92
36. Shi W. The contribution of organization factors in the success of electronic government commerce. International Journal of Public Administration 25 5 (2002) 629-658
37. Tan C., and Pan S. Managing e-transformation in the public sector: An e-government study of the Inland Revenue Authority of Singapore (IRAS). European Journal of Information Systems 12 (2003) 269-281
38. Tan C., Pan S., and Lim E. Managing stakeholder interests in e-government implementation: Lessons learned from a Singapore e-government project. Journal of Global Information Management 13 1 (2005) 31-53
39. Tapscott D., Lowy A., and Ticoll D. Blueprint to the digital economy: Creating wealth in the era of e-business (1989), McGraw-Hill, New York
40. Walsham G. Interpretive case studies in IS research: Nature and method. European Journal of Information Systems 4 (1995) 74-81
41. World Bank. 2006. World Bank 2006 Report. Retrieved 03 January 2006 from http://www.worldbank.org/egov/
42. Yin R. Case study research: Design and methods. 2nd edition (1994), Sage, Newbury Park, CA