메뉴 건너뛰기
American Journal of Medicine
Volumn 120, Issue 4, 2007, Pages 287-288
Peer Review: The Best of the Blemished?
Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]
Indexed keywords

DECISION MAKING; EDITORIAL; HUMAN; MEDICAL LITERATURE; PEER REVIEW; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PUBLICATION;
EID: 33947604415     PISSN: 00029343     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2007.02.013     Document Type: Editorial
Times cited : (9)
References (11)
  • 1
    • 33646104670 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Peer review: a flawed process at the heart of science and journals
    • Smith R. Peer review: a flawed process at the heart of science and journals. J R Soc Med. 99 (2006) 178-182
    • (2006) J R Soc Med. , vol.99 , pp. 178-182
    • Smith, R.1
  • 2
    • 0038313097 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Impartial judgment by the "gatekeepers" of science: fallibility and accountability in the peer review process
    • Hojat M., Gonnella J.S., and Caelleigh A.S. Impartial judgment by the "gatekeepers" of science: fallibility and accountability in the peer review process. Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 8 (2003) 75-96
    • (2003) Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. , vol.8 , pp. 75-96
    • Hojat, M.1    Gonnella, J.S.2    Caelleigh, A.S.3
  • 3
    • 0037024214 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Effects of editorial peer review: a systematic review
    • Jefferson T., Alderson P., Wager E., and Davidoff F. Effects of editorial peer review: a systematic review. JAMA 287 (2002) 2784-2786
    • (2002) JAMA , vol.287 , pp. 2784-2786
    • Jefferson, T.1    Alderson, P.2    Wager, E.3    Davidoff, F.4
  • 4
    • 32944467685 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Nurse editors' views on the peer review process
    • Kearney M.H., and Freda M.C. Nurse editors' views on the peer review process. Res Nurs Health 28 (2005) 444-452
    • (2005) Res Nurs Health , vol.28 , pp. 444-452
    • Kearney, M.H.1    Freda, M.C.2
  • 5
    • 0033068770 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • How do peer reviewers of journal articles perform?. Evaluating the reviewers with a sham paper
    • Kumar P.D. How do peer reviewers of journal articles perform?. Evaluating the reviewers with a sham paper. J Assoc Physicians India 47 (1999) 198-200
    • (1999) J Assoc Physicians India , vol.47 , pp. 198-200
    • Kumar, P.D.1
  • 6
    • 0025015166 scopus 로고
    • The evolution of editorial peer review
    • Burnham J.C. The evolution of editorial peer review. JAMA 263 (1990) 1323-1329
    • (1990) JAMA , vol.263 , pp. 1323-1329
    • Burnham, J.C.1
  • 7
    • 0024992620 scopus 로고
    • Peer review of the biomedical literature
    • Olson C.M. Peer review of the biomedical literature. Am J Emerg Med. 8 (1990) 356-358
    • (1990) Am J Emerg Med. , vol.8 , pp. 356-358
    • Olson, C.M.1
  • 8
    • 0037170617 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Conflicts of interest: science, money, and health
    • Alpert J.S., Furman S., and Smaha L. Conflicts of interest: science, money, and health. Arch Intern Med. 162 (2002) 635-637
    • (2002) Arch Intern Med. , vol.162 , pp. 635-637
    • Alpert, J.S.1    Furman, S.2    Smaha, L.3
  • 9
    • 0037024254 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Making reviewers visible: openness, accountability, and credit
    • Godlee F. Making reviewers visible: openness, accountability, and credit. JAMA 287 (2002) 2762-2765
    • (2002) JAMA , vol.287 , pp. 2762-2765
    • Godlee, F.1
  • 10
    • 32844456729 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Dear editor
    • Alpert J.S. Dear editor. Am J Med. 119 (2006) 193
    • (2006) Am J Med. , vol.119 , pp. 193
    • Alpert, J.S.1
  • 11
    • 33644971969 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Editors and publishing: integrity, trust, and faith
    • Freshwater D. Editors and publishing: integrity, trust, and faith. J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs. 13 (2006) 1-2
    • (2006) J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs. , vol.13 , pp. 1-2
    • Freshwater, D.1

* 이 정보는 Elsevier사의 SCOPUS DB에서 KISTI가 분석하여 추출한 것입니다.