Editors and publishing: Integrity, trust and faith

Journal of Psychiatric and Mental Health Nursing

Volumn 13, Issue 1, 2006, Pages 1-2

  Freshwater, Dawn ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EDITORIAL; ETHICS; HUMAN; NURSING RESEARCH; PEER REVIEW; PUBLICATION; PUBLISHING; SCIENTIFIC MISCONDUCT;

EDITORIAL POLICIES; HUMANS; NURSING RESEARCH; PEER REVIEW, RESEARCH; PERIODICALS; SCIENTIFIC MISCONDUCT;

EID: 33644971969     PISSN: 13510126     EISSN: 13652850     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2850.2006.00949.x     Document Type: Editorial

References (10)

1. Bennett D.M. & Taylor D. (2003) Unethical practices in authorship of scientific papers. Emergency Medicine 15, 263-270.
2. Bloch S. & Walter G. (2001) The impact factor: time for change. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry 35, 563-568.
3. Brice J. & Bligh J. (2004) Author misconduct: not just the editors' responsibility. Medical Education 39, 83-89.
4. Buchanan-Barker P. & Barker P. (2005) Observation: the original sin of mental health nursing? Journal of Psychiatric and Mental Health Nursing 12, 541-549.
5. Fenton J.E. & Jones A.S. (2002) Integrity in medical research and publication. Clinical Otolaryngology 27, 436-439.
6. Freshwater D. (2005) Re-viewing (a year in the life . . .). Journal of Psychiatric and Mental Health Nursing 12, 385-386.
7. Hegyvary S. (2005) What every author should know about redundant and duplicate publication. Journal of Nursing Scholarship 37, 295-297.
8. McKenzie R. (2005) Am I flogging a dead metaphor? Sloppy scholarship and the implied spider. Journal of Psychiatric and Mental Health Nursing 12, 550-555.
9. Snell L. & Spencer J. (2005) Referees' perceptions of the peer review process for a medical education journal. Medical Education 39, 90-97.
10. Tandon R.K. & Roberts-Thompson I.C. (2002) Shepherds of science: shear the flock not skin them. Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology 17, 816-817.