Double dissociation between first- and second-order processing

Vision Research

Volumn 47, Issue 9, 2007, Pages 1129-1141

  Allard, Rémy ^a   Faubert, Jocelyn ^a  

^a UNIVERSITÉ DE MONTRÉAL   (Canada)

Author keywords

Filter rectify filter model; Internal equivalent noise; Noise; Rectification process; Second order

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; DISSOCIATION; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; LUMINANCE; NOISE; NORMAL HUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; STIMULUS RESPONSE; VISION;

ADULT; CONTRAST SENSITIVITY; HUMANS; LIGHTING; MODELS, PSYCHOLOGICAL; PATTERN RECOGNITION, VISUAL; PHOTIC STIMULATION; PSYCHOPHYSICS; SENSORY THRESHOLDS;

EID: 33947592955     PISSN: 00426989     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.visres.2007.01.010     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Allard R., and Faubert J. Same calculation efficiency but different internal noise for luminance- and contrast-modulated stimuli detection. Journal of Vision 6 4 (2006) 322-334
2. Baker Jr. C.L. Central neural mechanisms for detecting second-order motion. Current Opinion in Neurobiology 9 4 (1999) 461-466
3. Bennett P.J., Sekuler A.B., and Ozin L. Effects of aging on calculation efficiency and equivalent noise. Journal of the Optical Society of America, A, Optics, Image Science, and Vision 16 3 (1999) 654-668
4. Benton C.P. Gradient-based analysis of non-Fourier motion. Vision Research 42 26 (2002) 2869-2877
5. Benton C.P., and Johnston A. A new approach to analysing texture-defined motion. Proceedings of the Biological Science 268 1484 (2001) 2435-2443
6. Benton C.P., Johnston A., McOwan P.W., and Victor J.D. Computational modeling of non-Fourier motion: further evidence for a single luminance-based mechanism. Journal of the Optical Society of America, A, Optics, Image Science, and Vision 18 9 (2001) 2204-2208
7. Bertone A., Mottron L., Jelenic P., and Faubert J. Motion perception in autism: a "complex" issue. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 15 2 (2003) 218-225
8. Bertone A., Mottron L., Jelenic P., and Faubert J. Enhanced and diminished visuo-spatial information processing in autism depends on stimulus complexity. Brain 128 Pt 10 (2005) 2430-2441
9. Campbell F.W., and Robson J.G. Application of Fourier analysis to the visibility of gratings. Journal of Physiology 197 3 (1968) 551-566
10. Cavanagh P., and Mather G. Motion: the long and short of it. Spatial Vision 4 2-3 (1989) 103-129
11. Chubb C., and Sperling G. Drift-balanced random stimuli: a general basis for studying non-Fourier motion perception. Journal of the Optical Society of America A 5 11 (1988) 1986-2007
12. Derrington A.M., and Badcock D.R. Separate detectors for simple and complex grating patterns?. Vision Research 25 12 (1985) 1869-1878
13. Derrington A.M., and Badcock D.R. Detection of spatial beats: non-linearity or contrast increment detection?. Vision Research 26 2 (1986) 343-348
14. Dosher B.A., and Lu Z.-L. Level and mechanisms of perceptual learning: learning first-order luminance and second-order texture objects. Vision Research 46 12 (2006) 1996-2007
15. Faubert J. Visual perception and aging. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology 56 3 (2002) 164-176
16. Georgeson M.A., and Schofield A.J. Shading and texture: separate information channels with a common adaptation mechanism?. Spatial Vision 16 1 (2002) 59-76
17. Habak C., and Faubert J. Larger effect of aging on the perception of higher-order stimuli. Vision Research 40 8 (2000) 943-950
18. He S., and Macleod D.I. Contrast-modulation flicker: dynamics and spatial resolution of the light adaptation process. Vision Research 38 7 (1998) 985-1000
19. Henning G.B., Hertz B.G., and Broadbent D.E. Some experiments bearing on the hypothesis that the visual system analyses spatial patterns in independent bands of spatial frequency. Vision Research 15 (1975) 887-897
20. Legge G.E., and Foley J.M. Contrast masking in human vision. Journal of the Optical Society of America 70 12 (1980) 1458-1471
21. Legge G.E., Kersten D., and Burgess A.E. Contrast discrimination in noise. Journal of the Optical Society of America A 4 2 (1987) 391-404
22. Levitt, H. (1971). Transformed up-down methods in psychoacoustics. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 49 (2), Suppl 2:467+.
23. Lu Z.L., and Dosher B.A. External noise distinguishes attention mechanisms. Vision Research 38 9 (1998) 1183-1198
24. MacLeod D.I., Williams D.R., and Makous W. A visual nonlinearity fed by single cones. Vision Research 32 2 (1992) 347-363
25. Pelli D.G. The effects of visual noise. Department of Physiology, Ph.D (1981), Cambridge University, Cambridge
26. Pelli D.G. The quantum efficiency of vision. In: Blakemore C. (Ed). Visual coding and efficiency (1990), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
27. Ross J., and Speed H.D. Perceived contrast following adaptation to gratings of different orientations. Vision Research 36 12 (1996) 1811-1818
28. Schofield A.J., and Georgeson M.A. Sensitivity to modulations of luminance and contrast in visual white noise: separate mechanisms with similar behaviour. Vision Research 39 16 (1999) 2697-2716
29. Schofield A.J., and Georgeson M.A. The temporal properties of first- and second-order vision. Vision Research 40 18 (2000) 2475-2487
30. Scott-Samuel N.E., and Georgeson M.A. Does early non-linearity account for second-order motion?. Vision Research 39 17 (1999) 2853-2865
31. Smith A.T., and Ledgeway T. Separate detection of moving luminance and contrast modulations: fact or artifact?. Vision Research 37 1 (1997) 45-62
32. Snowden R.J., and Hammett S.T. Subtractive and divisive adaptation in the human visual system. Nature 355 6357 (1992) 248-250
33. Snowden R.J., and Hammett S.T. Spatial frequency adaptation: threshold elevation and perceived contrast. Vision Research 36 12 (1996) 1797-1809
34. Taub E., Victor J.D., and Conte M.M. Nonlinear preprocessing in short-range motion. Vision Research 37 11 (1997) 1459-1477
35. Treisman A.M., and Gelade G. A feature-integration theory of attention. Cognitive Psychology 12 1 (1980) 97-136
36. Wilson H.R., Ferrera V.P., and Yo C. A psychophysically motivated model for two-dimensional motion perception. Visual Neuroscience 9 1 (1992) 79-97