The influence of punctuation and word class on distributed processing in normal reading

Vision Research

Volumn 47, Issue 9, 2007, Pages 1215-1227

  Pynte, Joël ^a   Kennedy, Alan ^b  

^a CNRS   (France)

^b UNIVERSITY OF DUNDEE   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Eye movement control; Parafoveal on foveal effects; Reading; Spillover; Word class

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; EYE MOVEMENT; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; MULTIPLE REGRESSION; NORMAL HUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROBABILITY; READING; RETINA FOVEA; WORD RECOGNITION;

FIXATION, OCULAR; FOVEA CENTRALIS; HUMANS; PATTERN RECOGNITION, VISUAL; READING; SACCADES; SEMANTICS;

EID: 33947573684     PISSN: 00426989     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.visres.2006.12.006     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Altarriba J., Kambe G., Pollatsek A., and Rayner K. Semantic codes are not used in integrating information across eye fixations in reading: evidence from fluent Spanish English bilinguals. Perception and Psychophysics 63 (2001) 875-890
2. Balota D.A. The role of meaning in word recognition. In: Balota D.A., Floresd'Arcais G.B., and Rayner K. (Eds). Comprehension processes in reading (1989), NJ, Erlbaum, Hillsdale 9-32
3. Balota D.A. Visual word recognition: The journey from features to meaning. In: Gernsbacher M.A. (Ed). Handbook of psycholinguistics (1994), Academic Press, San Diego, CA 303-348
4. Brysbaert M., Drieghe D., and Vitu F. Word skipping: Implications for theories of eye movement control in reading. In: Underwood G. (Ed). Cognitive processes in eye guidance (2005), Oxford University Press, Oxford 53-77
5. Ehrlich K., and Rayner K. Pronoun assignment and semantic integraion duing reading: eye movements and immediacy of processing. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 22 (1983) 75-87
6. Greenberg S.N., Healy A.F., Koriat A., and Kreiner H. The GO model: a reconsideration of the role of structural units in guiding and organizing text on line. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review 11 (2004) 428-433
7. Henderson J.M., and Ferreira F. Effects of foveal processing difficulty on the perceptual span in reading: Implications for attention and eye movement control. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition 16 (1990) 417-429
8. Hill R.L., and Murray W.S. Commas and spaces: Effects of punctuation on eye movements and sentence parsing. In: Kennedy A., Radach R., Heller D., and Pynte J. (Eds). Reading as a perceptual process (2000), Elsevier, Oxford 565-589
9. Hirotani M., Frazier L., and Rayner K. Punctuation and intonation effects on clause and sentence wrap-up: evidence from eye movements. Journal of Memory and Language 54 (2006) 425-443
10. Kennedy A. Parafoveal processing in word recognition. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 53A (2000) 429-455
11. Kennedy A. On keeping word order straight. Commentary on E. D. Reichle, K. Rayner and A. Pollatsek "The E-Z Reader Model of Eye Movement Control in Reading: Comparisons to Other Models. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 26 (2003) 46-47
12. Kennedy, A. (2003b). The Dundee Corpus [CD-ROM]. Psychology Department, The University of Dundee.
13. Kennedy A., and Pynte J. Parafoveal-on foveal effects in normal reading. Vision Research 45 (2005) 153-168
14. Kennedy A., Pynte J., and Ducrot S. Parafoveal-on-foveal interactions in word recognition. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 55A (2002) 1307-1337
15. Kliegl R., Nuthmann A., and Engbert R. Tracking the mind during reading: the influence of past, present, and future words on fixation durations. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 135 (2006) 12-35
16. Loftus G.R., and Masson M.E.J. Using confidence intervals in within-subject designs. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review 1 (1994) 476-490
17. Lorch R.F., and Myers J.L. Regression analyses of repeated measures data in cognitive research. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition 16 (1990) 149-157
18. Murray W.S. Sentence processing: Issues and measures. In: Kennedy A., Radach R., Heller D., and Pynte J. (Eds). Reading as a perceptual process (2000), Elsevier Science, Oxford 649-664
19. Nuthmann A., Engbert R., and Kliegl R. Mislocated fixations during reading and the inverted optimal viewing position effect. Vision Research 45 (2005) 2201-2217
20. O'Regan K., Pynte J., and Coëffé C. Comment le regard explore un mot isolé. Bulletin de Psychologie 39 (1986) 7-10
21. Pynte J., and Kennedy A. An influence over eye movements in reading exerted from beyond the level of the word: evidence from reading English and French. Vision Research 46 (2006) 3786-3801
22. Rayner K. Eye movements and cognitive processes in reading, visual search, and scene perception. In: Findlay J.M., Walker R., and Kentridge R.W. (Eds). Eye movement research: Mechanisms processes and applications (1995), Amsterdam, North-Holland 3-21
23. Rayner K., and Duffy S.A. Lexical complexity and fixation times in reading: effects of word frequency, verb complexity, and lexical ambiguity. Memory and Cognition 14 (1986) 191-201
24. Rayner, K., Juhasz, B. J., & Brown, S. J. (in press). Do readers obtain preview benefit from word n + 2? A test of serial attention shift versus distributed lexical processing of eye movement control in reading. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance.
25. Rayner K., Warren T., Juhasz B.J., and Liversedge S.P. The effect of plausibility on eye movements in reading. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition. 30 (2004) 1290-1301
26. Rayner K., White S., Kambe G., Miller B., and Liversedge S. On the processing of meaning from parafoveal vision during eye fixations in reading. In: Hyönä J., Radach R., and Deubel H. (Eds). The Mind's Eye: Cognitive and applied aspects of eye movement research (2003), Elsevier Science, Oxford 213-234
27. Reichle E.D., Pollatsek A., Fisher D.L., and Rayner K. Toward a model of eye movement control in reading. Psychological Review 105 (1998) 125-157
28. Reichle E.D., Rayner K., and Pollatsek A. The E-Z reader model of eye movement control in reading: comparisons to other models. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 26 (2003) 445-476
29. Schroyens W., Vitu F., Brysbaert M., and d'Ydewalle G. Visual attention and eye-movement control during reading: the case of parafoveal processing. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 52A (1999) 1021-1046
30. Vitu F., McConkie G.W., Kerr P., and O'Regan J.K. Fixation location effects on fixation durations during reading: an inverted optimal viewing position effect. Vision Research 41 (2001) 3513-3533