메뉴 건너뛰기




Volumn 11, Issue 4, 2006, Pages 405-410

Publication in peer-reviewed medical journals

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EDITOR; MEDICAL LITERATURE; MEDICAL RESEARCH; NOTE; PEER REVIEW; PEER REVIEW ORGANIZATION; PUBLICATION; PUBLISHING; RESEARCH ETHICS; HUMAN; REVIEW;

EID: 33947537263     PISSN: 11070625     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Note
Times cited : (3)

References (27)
  • 1
    • 0026234197 scopus 로고
    • Publishing in peer-reviewed journals. Fundamentals for new investigators
    • Tipton CM. Publishing in peer-reviewed journals. Fundamentals for new investigators. Physiologist 1991; 34: 275-279.
    • (1991) Physiologist , vol.34 , pp. 275-279
    • Tipton, C.M.1
  • 2
    • 0021039484 scopus 로고
    • Editing medical journals
    • Gray DJP. Editing medical journals. Practitioner 1983; 227: 1849-1858.
    • (1983) Practitioner , vol.227 , pp. 1849-1858
    • Gray, D.J.P.1
  • 3
    • 0025187309 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Smith J. Journalology-or what editors do. BMJ 1990; 301: 756-759.
    • Smith J. Journalology-or what editors do. BMJ 1990; 301: 756-759.
  • 4
    • 0028576904 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Goodman SN, Berlin J, Flet SW, Fletcher RH. Manuscript quality before and after peer review and editing at Annals of Internal Medicine. Ann Intern Med 1994; 121: 11-21.
    • Goodman SN, Berlin J, Flet SW, Fletcher RH. Manuscript quality before and after peer review and editing at Annals of Internal Medicine. Ann Intern Med 1994; 121: 11-21.
  • 6
    • 0003673035 scopus 로고
    • Hall GM ed, BMJ Publishing Group, London
    • Hall GM (ed): How to write a paper. BMJ Publishing Group, London, 1994.
    • (1994) How to write a paper
  • 7
    • 0030870950 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Peer-review: Reform or revolution?
    • Smith R. Peer-review: Reform or revolution? BMJ 1997; 315: 759-760.
    • (1997) BMJ , vol.315 , pp. 759-760
    • Smith, R.1
  • 8
    • 84888705798 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Schroter S, Tite L, Hutchings A, Black N. Comparison of author and editor suggested reviewers in terms of review quality, timeliness, and recommendation for publication. International Congress in Peer Review and Biomedical Publishing, Chicago, 2005, p 12.
    • Schroter S, Tite L, Hutchings A, Black N. Comparison of author and editor suggested reviewers in terms of review quality, timeliness, and recommendation for publication. International Congress in Peer Review and Biomedical Publishing, Chicago, 2005, p 12.
  • 9
    • 8344272908 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Seals DR, Tanaka H. Manuscript peer review: A helpful check-list for novice referees. Adv Physiol Educ 2000; 23: 52-58.
    • Seals DR, Tanaka H. Manuscript peer review: A helpful check-list for novice referees. Adv Physiol Educ 2000; 23: 52-58.
  • 10
    • 29944438252 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • The history and meaning of the impact factor
    • Garfield E. The history and meaning of the impact factor. JAMA 2006; 295: 90-93.
    • (2006) JAMA , vol.295 , pp. 90-93
    • Garfield, E.1
  • 11
    • 84888735230 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Brkić S, Vucković-Dekić Lj, Bogdanović G (eds): Publikovanje u biomedicini. Naucnoistrazivacki rad i prezentacija rezultata istrazivanja (Publising in biomedical journals. Guide to the research and presentation of research findings). Novi Sad, Medicinski fakultet, 2006 (in Serbian).
    • Brkić S, Vucković-Dekić Lj, Bogdanović G (eds): Publikovanje u biomedicini. Naucnoistrazivacki rad i prezentacija rezultata istrazivanja (Publising in biomedical journals. Guide to the research and presentation of research findings). Novi Sad, Medicinski fakultet, 2006 (in Serbian).
  • 12
    • 0346413326 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Teaching students how to read and write science: A mandatory course on scientific research and communication in medicine
    • Marusic A, Marusic M. Teaching students how to read and write science: a mandatory course on scientific research and communication in medicine. Acad Med 2003; 78: 1235-1239.
    • (2003) Acad Med , vol.78 , pp. 1235-1239
    • Marusic, A.1    Marusic, M.2
  • 13
    • 84888752188 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Igić R. Kako se pišu saopštenja o medicinskim istrazivanjima (How to write papers in the medical sciences). Sarajevo, Veselin Maslesa, 1980 (in Serbo-Croatian).
    • Igić R. Kako se pišu saopštenja o medicinskim istrazivanjima (How to write papers in the medical sciences). Sarajevo, Veselin Maslesa, 1980 (in Serbo-Croatian).
  • 15
    • 84888691862 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Igić R. Uputstva za pisanje doktorske disertacije i magistarskog rada (Interactions for the PhD dissertation and MS thesis writing). Tuzla, Medicinski fakultet, 1991 (in Serbo-Croatian).
    • Igić R. Uputstva za pisanje doktorske disertacije i magistarskog rada (Interactions for the PhD dissertation and MS thesis writing). Tuzla, Medicinski fakultet, 1991 (in Serbo-Croatian).
  • 16
    • 0035006001 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Marusic M, Marusic A. Good editorial practice: editors as educators. Croat Med J 2001; 42: 113-120.
    • Marusic M, Marusic A. Good editorial practice: editors as educators. Croat Med J 2001; 42: 113-120.
  • 17
    • 33749175050 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Preventing Scientific fraud
    • Noble DW. Preventing Scientific fraud. Ann Intern Med 2006; 145: 472.
    • (2006) Ann Intern Med , vol.145 , pp. 472
    • Noble, D.W.1
  • 18
    • 33747606460 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Math SB, Marcus SC, Druss BG. Retractions in the research literature: Misconduct or mistakes? MJA 2006; 185: 1542-1544.
    • Math SB, Marcus SC, Druss BG. Retractions in the research literature: Misconduct or mistakes? MJA 2006; 185: 1542-1544.
  • 19
    • 33344464153 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Good scientific practice
    • Milosevic D, Vuckovic-Dekic Lj. Good scientific practice. J BUON 2005; 10: 491-493.
    • (2005) J BUON , vol.10 , pp. 491-493
    • Milosevic, D.1    Vuckovic-Dekic, L.2
  • 20
    • 33748933011 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Role of systematic reviews in detecting plagiarism: Case of Asim Kurjak
    • Chalmers I. Role of systematic reviews in detecting plagiarism: case of Asim Kurjak. BMJ 2006; 333: 594-596.
    • (2006) BMJ , vol.333 , pp. 594-596
    • Chalmers, I.1
  • 21
    • 33749175050 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Preventing scientific fraud
    • Garfield E. Preventing scientific fraud. Ann Intern Med 2006; 145; 472-473.
    • (2006) Ann Intern Med , vol.145 , pp. 472-473
    • Garfield, E.1
  • 22
    • 33645957658 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Research misconduct, retraction, and cleansing the medical literature: Lessons from the Poehlman case
    • Sox HC, Rennie D. Research misconduct, retraction, and cleansing the medical literature: Lessons from the Poehlman case. Ann Intern Med 2006; 144: E7-E11.
    • (2006) Ann Intern Med , vol.144
    • Sox, H.C.1    Rennie, D.2
  • 23
    • 33646426923 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Van der Weyden MB. Preventing and processing research misconduct: a new Australian code for responsible research. MJA 2006; 184: 430-431.
    • Van der Weyden MB. Preventing and processing research misconduct: a new Australian code for responsible research. MJA 2006; 184: 430-431.
  • 25
    • 33645006800 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Open access publishing: First the evidence-then verdict
    • Aronson JK. "Open access" publishing: First the evidence-then verdict. J Royal Soc Med 2006; 99: 103-104.
    • (2006) J Royal Soc Med , vol.99 , pp. 103-104
    • Aronson, J.K.1
  • 26
    • 0242486446 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • 21st-century biomedical journals: Failures and futures
    • Horton R. 21st-century biomedical journals: Failures and futures. Lancet 2003; 362: 1510-1512.
    • (2003) Lancet , vol.362 , pp. 1510-1512
    • Horton, R.1
  • 27
    • 33645012329 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Open access for the JRSM
    • Abbasi K. Open access for the JRSM. J Roy Soc Med 2006; 99: 101.
    • (2006) J Roy Soc Med , vol.99 , pp. 101
    • Abbasi, K.1


* 이 정보는 Elsevier사의 SCOPUS DB에서 KISTI가 분석하여 추출한 것입니다.