'Open-access' publishing: First the evidence - Then the verdict

Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine

Volumn 99, Issue 3, 2006, Pages 103-104

  Aronson, Jeffrey K ^a  

^a RADCLIFFE INFIRMARY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACCESS TO INFORMATION; EDITORIAL; INFORMATION DISSEMINATION; MEDICAL RESEARCH; PEER REVIEW; PHYSICIAN ATTITUDE; PUBLIC OPINION; PUBLICATION; PUBLISHING; QUESTIONNAIRE;

EID: 33645006800     PISSN: 01410768     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1258/jrsm.99.3.103     Document Type: Editorial

References (11)

1. Morgan DL, Kreuger RA. When to use focus groups and why. In: Morgan DL, ed. Successful Focus Groups. London: Sage, 1993
2. Boynton PM, Greenhalgh T. Selecting, designing, and developing your questionnaire. BMJ 2004;328:1312-15
3. Adams AS, Soumerai SB, Lomas J, Ross-Degnan D. Evidence of self-report bias in assessing adherence to guidelines. Int J Qual Health Care 1999;11:187-92
4. Schroter S, Tite L. Open access publishing and author-pays business models: a survey of authors' knowledge and perceptions. J R Soc Med 2006;99:141-8
5. Meyers B. Open access: a matter for definition. Society for Scholarly Publishing. Issue Status Report, June 2004. [www.sspnet.org/i4a/pages/Index.cfm? pageid3571] Accessed 31 January 2006
6. Cuervo LG, Aronson JK. The road to health care. BMJ 2004;329:1-2
7. Aronson JK. Open access publishing: too much oxygen? BMJ 2005; 330:759 [http://bmj.bmjjournals.com/cgi/content/full/330/7494/759/DC1] Accessed 31 January 2006
8. The Royal Society's position on open access publishing. [www.royalsoc.ac.uk/page.asp?id3967] Accessed 31 January 2006
9. Scientific publications: free for all? Hansard 15 Dec 2005: Columns 501WH-548WH [www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm200506/cmhansrd/cm051215/ halltext/51215h01.htm] Accessed 31 January 2006
10. Check E. NIH open-access plans draw fire from both sides. Nature 2005;433:561
11. Maldonado G, Poole C. More research is needed. Ann Epidemiol 1999;9:17-18