21st-century biomedical journals: Failures and futures

Lancet

Volumn 362, Issue 9395, 2003, Pages 1510-1512

  Horton, Richard ^a  

^a THE LANCET   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

INFORMATION PROCESSING; INTERPERSONAL COMMUNICATION; LEADERSHIP; MEDICAL LITERATURE; MEDICAL SOCIETY; NOTE; PEER REVIEW; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PUBLISHING; QUALITY CONTROL;

EID: 0242486446     PISSN: 01406736     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(03)14775-7     Document Type: Note

References (14)

1. Economic analysis of scientific research publishing. London: The Wellcome Trust, 2003.
2. Adam D. Scientists take on the publishers in an experiment to make research free to all. The Guardian Oct 6, 2003: 3.
3. Butler D. Who will pay for open access? Nature. 425:2003;554-555.
4. Brown P.O., Eisen M.B., Varmus H.E. Why PLoS became a publisher. PLoS Biology. 1:2003;1-2.
5. Tamber P.S., Godlee F., Newmark P. Open access to peer-reviewed research: making it happen. Lancet. 362:2003;1575-1577.
6. Crawford B.D. Open access publishing: where is the value? Lancet. 362:2003;1578-1580.
7. Held MJ. Proposed legislation supports an untested publishing model. J Cell Biol 2003: http://www.jcb.org/cgi/doi/10.1083/jcb.200307018 (accessed Oct 28, 2003).
8. Horton R. Medical journals: evidence of bias against the diseases of poverty. Lancet. 361:2003;712-713.
9. Jefferson T., Wager E., Davidoff F. Measuring the quality of editorial peer review. JAMA. 287:2002;2786-2790.
10. Jefferson T., Alderson P., Wager E., Davidoff F. Effects of editorial peer review: a systematic review. JAMA. 287:2002;2784-2786.
11. Henderson M. Flawed study shakes faith in journal. The Times Sept 12, 2003: 16.
12. Kareiva P., Marvier M., West S., Hornisher J. Slow-moving journals hinder conservation efforts. Nature. 420:2002;15.
13. Lawrence P.A. The politics of publication. Nature. 422:2003;259-261.
14. Bok D. Universities in the marketplace. 2003;Princeton University Press, Princeton.