Elucidation of control mechanisms discovered during adaptive manipulation of [Ru(dpb)3](PF6)2 emission in the solution phase

Journal of Physical Chemistry A

Volumn 111, Issue 8, 2007, Pages 1426-1433

  Montgomery, Matthew A ^a   Damrauer, Niels H ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

MOLECULAR SYSTEMS; SECOND-ORDER SPECTRAL RESPONSE; SPECTRAL CONTROL PATHWAY;

ADAPTIVE ALGORITHMS; ADAPTIVE CONTROL SYSTEMS; COMPUTER SIMULATION; HARMONIC ANALYSIS; PHOTONS; POWER SPECTRUM;

RUTHENIUM COMPOUNDS;

ORGANOMETALLIC COMPOUND; RUTHENIUM;

ARTICLE; CHEMISTRY; SOLUTION AND SOLUBILITY;

ORGANOMETALLIC COMPOUNDS; RUTHENIUM; SOLUTIONS;

EID: 33947414073     PISSN: 10895639     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1021/jp065962s     Document Type: Article

References (86)

1. Rice, S. A.; Zhao, M. Optical Control of Molecular Dynamics; Wiley: New York, 2000.
2. Dantus, M.; Lozovoy, V. V. Chem. Rev. 2004, 104, 1813-1859.
3. Gordon, R. J.; Rice, S. A. Annu. Rev. Phys. Chem. 1997, 48, 601-641.
4. Shapiro, M.; Brumer, P. Adv. At., Mol., Opt. Phys. 2000, 42, 287-343.
5. Vitanov, N. V.; Fleischhauer, M.; Shore, B. W.; Bergmann, K. Adv. At., Mol., Opt. Phys. 2001, 46, 55-190.
6. Brixner, T.; Damrauer, N. H.; Gerber, G. Adv. At., Mol., Opt. Phys. 2001, 46, 1-54.
7. Rabitz, H.; Zhu, W. Acc. Chem. Res. 2000, 33, 572-578.
8. Baumen, T.; Gerber, G. Adv. At., Mol., Opt. Phys. 1995, 35, 163-208.
9. Wollenhaupt, M.; Engel, V.; Baumert, T. Annu. Rev. Phys. Chem. 2005, 56, 25-56.
10. Tannor, D. J.; Rice, S. A. J. Chem. Phys. 1985, 83, 5013-5018.
11. Tannor, D. J.; Rice, S. A. Adv. Chem. Phys. 1988, 70, 441.
12. Tannor, D. J.; Kosloff, R.; Rice, S. A. J. Chem. Phys. 1986, 85, 5805-5820.
13. Baumert, T.; Grosser, M.; Thalweiser, R.; Gerber, G. Phys. Rev. Lett. 1991, 67, 3753-3756.
14. Baumert, T.; Gerber, G. Isr. J. Chem. 1994, 34, 103.
15. Brumer, P.; Shapiro, M. Chem. Phys. Lett. 1986, 126, 541-564.
16. Shapiro, M.; Hepburn, J. W.; Brumer, P. Chem. Phys. Lett. 1988, 149, 451-454.
17. Zhu, L. C.; Kleiman, V.; Li, X. N.; Lu, S. P.; Trentelman, K.; Gordon, R. J. Science 1995, 270, 77-80.
18. Park, S. M.; Lu, S. P.; Gordon, R. J. J. Chem. Phys. 1991, 94, 8622-8624.
19. Gaubatz, U.; Rudecki, P.; Becker, M.; Schiemann, S.; Külz, M.; Bergmann, K. Chem. Phys. Lett. 1988, 149, 463-468.
20. Gaubatz, U.; Rudecki, P.; Schiemann, S.; Bergmann, K. J. Chem. Phys. 1990, 92, 5363-5376.
21. Bardeen, C. J.; Wang, Q.; Shank, C. V. J. Phys. Chem. A 1998, 102, 2759-2766.
22. Bardeen, C. J.; Wang, Q.; Shank, C. V. Phys. Rev. Lett. 1995, 75, 3410-3413.
23. Bardeen, C. J.; Yakovlev, V. V.; Wilson, K. R.; Carpenter, S. D.; Weber, P. M.; Warren, W. S. Chem. Phys. Lett. 1997, 280, 151-158.
24. Cao, J. S.; Bardeen, C. J.; Wilson, K. R. Phys. Rev. Lett. 1998, 80, 1406-1409.
25. Bardeen, C. J.; Yakovlev, V. V.; Squier, J. A.; Wilson, K. R. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1998, 120, 13023-13027.
26. Cao, J.; Bardeen, C. J.; Wilson, K. R. J. Chem. Phys. 2000, 113, 1898-1909.
27. Fleming, G. R. Chemical Applications of Ultrafast Spectroscopy; Oxford University Press: New York, 1986.
28. Judson, R. S.; Rabitz, H. Phys. Rev. Lett. 1992, 68, 1500-1503.
29. Assion, A.; Baumert, T.; Bergt, M.; Brixner, T.; Kiefer, B.; Seyfried, V.; Strehle, M.; Gerber, G. Science 1998, 282, 919-922.
30. Levis, R. J.; Menkir, G. M.; Rabitz, H. Science 2001, 292, 709-713.
31. Damrauer, N. H.; Dietle, C.; Krampen, G.; Lee, S. H.; Jung, K. H.; Gerber, G. Eur. Phys. J. D 2002, 20, 71-76.
32. Cardoza, D.; Baertschy, M.; Weinacht, T. J. Chem. Phys. 2005, 123, 074315.
33. Cardoza, D.; Baertschy, M.; Weinacht, T. Chem. Phys. Lett. 2005, 411, 311-315.
34. Daniel, C.; Full, J.; Gonzalez, L.; Lupulescu, C.; Manz, J.; Merli, A.; Vajda, S.; Woste, L. Science 2003, 299, 536-539.
35. Brixner, T.; Damrauer, N. H.; Niklaus, P.; Gerber, G. Nature 2001, 414, 57-60.
36. Herek, J. L.; Wohlleben, W.; Cogdell, R. J.; Zeidler, D.; Motzkus, M. Nature 2002, 417, 533-535.
37. Brixner, T.; Damrauer, N. H.; Kiefer, B.; Gerber, G. J. Chem. Phys. 2003, 118, 3692-3701.
38. Lee, S. H.; Jung, K. H.; Sung, J. H.; Hong, K. H.; Nam, C. H. J. Chem. Phys. 2002, 117, 9858-9861.
39. Zhang, S.; Sun, Z. R.; Zhang, X. Y.; Xu, Y.; Wang, Z. G.; Xu, Z. Z.; Li, R. X. Chem. Phys. Lett. 2005, 416, 346-350.
40. Ogilvie, J. P.; Kubarych, K. J.; Alexandrou, A.; Joffre, M. Opt. Lett. 2005, 30, 911-913.
41. Prokhorenko, V. I.; Nagy, A. M.; Miller, R. J. D. J. Chem. Phys. 2005, 122, 184502.
42. Nahmias, O.; Bismuth, O.; Shoshana, O.; Ruhman, S. J. Phys. Chem. A 2005, 109, 8246-8253.
43. Hauer, J.; Skenderovic, H.; Kompa, K. L.; Motzkus, M. Chem. Phys. Lett. 2006, 421, 523-528.
44. Papagiannakis, E.; Vengris, M.; Valkunas, L.; Cogdell, R. J.; van Grondelle, R.; Larsen, D. S. J. Phys. Chem. B 2006, 110, 5737-5746.
45. Otake, I.; Kano, S. S.; Wada, A. J. Chem. Phys. 2006, 124, 014501.
46. Rabitz, H. A.; Hsieh, M. M.; Rosenthal, C. M. Science 2004, 303, 1998-2001.
47. Cardoza, D.; Trallero-Herrero, C.; Langhojer, F.; Rabitz, H.; Weinacht, T. J. Chem. Phys. 2005, 122, 124306.
48. Geremia, J. M.; Rabitz, H. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2002, 89, 263902.
49. Chung, J. H.; Weiner, A. M. IEEE J. Sci. Top. Quantum Electron. 2006, 12, 297-306.
50. Dela Cruz, J. M.; Pastirk, I.; Lozovoy, V. V.; Walowicz, K. A.; Dantus, M. J. Phys. Chem. A 2004, 108, 53-58.
51. Lozovoy, V. V.; Pastirk, I.; Walowicz, K. A.; Dantus, M. J. Chem. Phys. 2003, 118, 3187-3196.
52. Walowicz, K. A.; Pastirk, I.; Lozovoy, V. V.; Dantus, M. J. Phys. Chem. A 2002, 106, 9369-9373.
53. Montgomery, M. A.; Meglen, R. R.; Damrauer, N. H. J. Phys. Chem. A 2006, 110, 6391-6394.
54. Damrauer, N. H.; Boussie, T. R.; Devenney, M.; McCusker, J. K. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1997, 119, 8253-8268.
55. 2+ species in acetonitrile versus methanol. Such experiments never showed evidence for optimization. This suggests to us that it is likely the mechanisms for control are very similar between the two different solvents. Certainly the linear absorption spectrum for this molecule in the two solvents is nearly identical.
56. Husimi, K. Proc. Phys. Math. Soc. Jpn. 1940, 22, 264.
57. Lalovic, D.; Davidovic, D. M.; Bijedic, N. Phys. Rev. A 1992, 46, 1206-1212.
58. Wigner, E. Phys. Rev. A 1932, 40, 749-759.
59. In review, it was asked if the evolution of the temporal profile of the shaped laser pulse was informative with regard to understanding the control mechanism. It should be noted that, as was reported by the Gerber group (cf. ref 37), we observed in a series of Husimi distributions representing the best pulses from sequential generations the gradual identification and refinement of pulse features (temporal versus frequency distributions) that are manifest in the optimal pulse shape. However, as mentioned in the article, because excitation involves the simultaneous absorption of at least two quanta from the field we find that neither the evolution of the Husimi distribution nor the evolution of the associated temporal profile is particularly revealing with regard to the control mechanism.
60. Broers, B.; Noordam, L. D.; Vandenheuvell, H. B. V. Phys. Rev. A 1992, 46, 2749-2756.
61. Meshulach, D.; Silberberg, Y. Phys. Rev. A 1999, 60, 1287-1292.
62. Meshulach, D.; Silberberg, Y. Nature 1998, 396, 239-242.
63. Bandrauk, A.D. Atomic and Molecular Processes with Short Intense Laser Pulses; Plenum Press: New York, 1987; Vol. 171.
64. Montgomery, M. A.; Damrauer, N. H. Manuscript in preparation.
65. Goeppert-Mayer, M. Ann. Phys. 1931, 9, 273.
66. Albota, M.; Beljonne, D.; Bredas, J. L.; Ehrlich, J. E.; Fu, J. Y.; Heikal, A. A.; Hess, S. E.; Kogej, T.; Levin, M. D.; Marder, S. R.; McConi-Maughon, D.; Perry, J. W.; Rockel, H.; Rumi, M.; Subramaniam, C.; Webc, W. W.; Wu, X. L.; Xu, C. Science 1998, 281, 1653-1656.
67. Dick, B.; Hohlneicher, G. J. Chem. Phys. 1982, 76, 5755-5760.
68. Goodman, L.; Rava, R. P. Ace. Chem. Res. 1984, 17, 250-257.
69. Xu, C.; Webb, W. W. J. Opt. Soc. Am. B 1996, 13, 481-491.
70. Kawamata, J.; Ogata, Y.; Yamagishi, A. Mol. Cryst. Liq. Cryst. 2002, 379, 389-394.
71. Slepkov, A. D.; Hegmann, F. A.; Tykwinski, R. R.; Kamada, K.; Ohta, K.; Marsden, J. A.; Spitler, E. L.; Miller, J. J.; Haley, M. M. Opt. Lett. 2006, 31, 3315-3317.
72. Shao, P.; Huang, B.; Chen, L. Q.; Liu, Z. J.; Qin, J. G.; Gong, H. M.; Ding, S.; Wang, Q. Q. J. Mater. Chem. 2005, 15, 4502-4506.
73. Day, P. N.; Nguyen, K. A.; Pachter, R. J. Phys. Chem. B 2005, 109, 1803-1814.
74. Castellano, F. N.; Malak, H.; Gryczynski, I.; Lakowicz, J. R. Inorg. Chem. 1997, 36, 5548-5551.
75. Thompson, D. W.; Wishart, J. F.; Brunschwig, B. S.; Sutin, N. J. Phys. Chem. A 2001, 105, 8117-8122.
76. Meisel, D.; Matheson, M. S.; Mulac, W. A.; Rabani, J. J. Phys. Chem. 1977, 81, 1449-1455.
77. Ballardini, R.; Gandolfi, M. T.; Balzani, V. J. Phys. Chem. 1988, 92, 56-60.
78. We qualify that this short pulse is near-bandwidth limited because it was generated by sending 0 V to each pixel in the pulse-shaper SLM. It therefore contains the phase accumulated in the laser, optical setup, and pulse shaper and is not completely bandwidth limited.
79. Demas, J. N.; Crosby, G. A. J. Phys. Chem. 1971, 75, 991-1024.
80. Demas, J. N.; Crosby, G. A. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1971, 93, 2841-2847.
81. Adamson, A. W.; Demas, J. N. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1971, 93, 1800-1801.
82. Juris, A.; Balzani, V.; Barigelletti, F.; Campagna, S.; Belser, P.; Vonzelewsky, A. Coord. Chem. Rev. 1988, 84, 85-277.
83. Damrauer, N. H.; Cerullo, G.; Yeh, A.; Boussie, T. R.; Shank, C. V.; McCusker, J. K. Science 1997, 275, 54-57.
84. McCusker, J. K. Acc. Chem. Res. 2003, 36, 876-887.
85. Damrauer, N. H.; McCusker, J. K. J. Phys. Chem. A 1999, 103, 8440-8446.
86. 3MLCT emission to two-photon absorption) with a pump-intensity loss measurement of two-photon absorption.