Quantum Optimally Controlled Transition Landscapes

Science

Volumn 303, Issue 5666, 2004, Pages 1998-2001

  Rabitz, Herschel A ^a   Hsieh, Michael M ^a   Rosenthal, Carey M ^b  

^a PRINCETON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b DREXEL UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACOUSTIC NOISE; COMPUTER SIMULATION; PROBABILITY; QUALITY CONTROL;

ENVIRONMENTAL DECOHERANCE; QUANTUM SYSTEMS;

QUANTUM THEORY;

PHYSICS;

ARTICLE; CALCULATION; COMPUTER SIMULATION; LANDSCAPE; MATHEMATICAL ANALYSIS; NOISE; PHASE TRANSITION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROBABILITY; QUANTUM MECHANICS;

EID: 1642307580     PISSN: 00368075     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1126/science.1093649     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. H. Rabitz, R. de Vivie-Riedle, M. Motzkus, K. Kompa, Science 288, 824 (2000).
2. S. A. Rice, M. Zhao, Optical Control of Molecular Dynamics (Wiley, New York, 2000).
3. R. S. Judson, H. Rabitz Phys. Rev. Lett. 68, 1500 (1992).
4. C. J. Bardeen et al., Chem. Phys. Lett. 280, 151 (1997).
5. R. J. Levis, G. M. Menkir, H. Rabitz, Science 292, 709 (2001).
6. A. Assion et al., Science 282, 919 (1998).
7. D. Meshulach, Y. Silberberg, Nature 396, 239 (1998).
8. T. Weinacht et al., Chem. Phys. Lett. 344, 333 (2001).
9. R. Bartels et al. Nature 406, 164 (2000).
10. J. J. Kunde et al., J. Opt. Soc. Am. B 18, 872 (2001).
11. T. Hornung et al., Appl. Phys. B Lasers Opt. 71, 277 (2000).
12. C. Daniel et al., Chem. Phys. 267, 247 (2001).
13. J. L. Herek et al., Nature 414, 57 (2001).
14. T. Brixner et al., J. Mod. Opt. 50, 539 (2003).
15. W. Zhu, H. Rabitz, Int. J. Quant. Chem. 93, 50 (2003).
16. D. Zeidler, S. Frey, K. L. Kompa, M. Motzkus, Phys. Rev. A 64, 023420 (2001).
17. B. J. Pearson, J. L. White, T. C. Weinacht, P. H. Bucksbaum, Phys. Rev. A 63, 063412 (2001).
18. M. Demiralp, H. Rabitz, Phys. Rev. A 47, 809 (1993).
19. V. Ramakrishna, M. V. Salapaka, M. Dahleh, H. Rabitz, A. Peirce, Phys. Rev. A 51, 960 (1995).
20. G. Turinici, H. Rabitz, J. Phys. A Math. Gen. 36, 2565 (2003).
21. M. D. Girardeau, S. G. Schirmer, J. V. Leahy, R. M. Koch, Phys. Rev. A 58, 2684 (1998).
22. pq)/(δC(t))]} be linearly independent. The analysis in this paper assumes that the entire N-dimensional quantum system is controllable. In particular, the N states could be the controllable portion of a larger system whose other states are not addressed by the control.
23. Supporting analysis is available on Science Online.
24. H. Rabitz, M. Hsieh, C. Rosenthal, unpublished results.
25. J. M. Geremia, W. Zhu, H. Rabitz, J. Chem. Phys. 113, 10841 (2000).
26. A. M. Weiner, Rev. Sci. Instrum. 71, 1929 (2000).
27. R. Wu, I. Sola, H. Rabitz, unpublished results.
28. The authors acknowledge NSF and ARO-MURI.