Sociometric status and self-image of children with specific and general learning disabilities in dutch general and special education classes

Learning Disability Quarterly

Volumn 30, Issue 1, 2007, Pages 47-62

  Bakker, Joep T A ^a   Denessen, Eddie ^a   Bosman, Anna M T ^a   Krijger, Eva Maria ^b   Bouts, Lex ^a  

^a RADBOUD UNIVERSITY NIJMEGEN   (Netherlands)

^b Radboud University Nijmegen ^*

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 33947130612     PISSN: 07319487     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2307/30035515     Document Type: Article

References (61)

1. Allport, G. W. (1954). The nature of prejudice. Oxford, UK: Addlson-Wesley.
2. Alston, P., Parker, S., & Seymour J. (1992). Children, rights, and the law. Oxford, UK: Clarendon Press.
3. Asher, S. R., Hymel, S., & Renshaw, P. D. (1984). Loneliness in children. Child Development, 55, 1456-1464.
4. Baehr, P. R., & Gordenker, L. (1992). The United Nations in the 1990s. London: Macmillan.
5. Baker, E. T., Wang, M. C., & Walberg, H. J. (1995). The effects of inclusion on learning. Educational Leadership, 52, 33-35.
6. Bakker, J.T.A. (2002). Kinderen met leerproblemen in de reguliere basisschool [Children with learning disabilities in regular education]. In G. M. Van der Aalsvoort & A. J. J. M. Ruijssenaars (Eds.), Jonge risicokinderen bij de start van het onderwijs: Een succesvolle aanpak door integratie? Leuven, Belgium: Acco.
7. Bakker, J.T.A., & Bosman, A.M.T. (2003). Self-image and peer acceptance of Dutch students in regular and special education. Learning Disability Quarterly, 26, 5-14.
8. Bakker, J.T.A., & van de Griendt, J. (1999). Zelfbeeld en sociale status van kinderen met leerproblemen in het regulier en speciaal onderwijs [Self-image and social status of children with learning disabilities in regular and special education]. Tijdschrift voor Orthopedagogiek, 38, 497-511.
9. Bakker, J.T.A., Denessen, E.J.P.G., & Bosman, A.M.T. (2005). Peer-acceptance and deviant behavior (Manuscript in preparation), Radboud University Nijmegen.
10. Banerji, M., & Dailey, R. A. (1995). A study of the effects of an inclusion model on students with specific learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 28, 511-522.
11. Bear, G. G., Minke, K. M., Griffin, S. M., & Deemer, S. A. (1998). Achievement-related perceptions of children with learning disabilities and normal achievement group and developmental differences. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 31, 91-104.
12. Bryan, T. (1974). Peer popularity of learning disabled children. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 7, 31-35.
13. Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analyses for the behavioral sciences. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum Associates.
14. Cole, J. D., Dodge, K. A., & Coppotelli, H. (1982). Dimensions and types of social status: A cross-age perspective. Developmental Psychology, 18, 557-570.
15. Cole, C. N., Waldron, N., & Majd, M. (2004). Academic progress of students across inclusive and traditional settings. Mental Retardation, 42, 136-144.
16. Cosden, M., Elliott, K., Noble, S., & Kelemen, E. (1999). Self-understanding and self-esteem in children with learning disabilities. Learning Disability Quarterly, 22, 279-290.
17. Crockett, J. B., & Kauffman, J. M. (1999). The least restrictive environment. Its origins and interpretation in special education. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
18. Dumont, J. J. (1990). Dyslexie: theorie, diagnostiek, behandeling. [Dyslexia: theory, assessment, and treatment]. Rotterdam, The Netherlands: Lemniscaat.
19. Festinger, L. (1954). A theory of social comparison processes. Human Relations, 7, 117-140.
20. Elbaum, B. (2002). The self-concept of students with learning disabilities: A meta-analysis of comparisons across different placements. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 17, 216-226.
21. Fillipini-Gaudiano, M. L. (1991). Handicappati nella scuola del'obbligio in provincia di Pesaro-Urbino: Presenza e integratione. Italian Journal of Intellective Impairment, 4, 123-128.
22. Forlin, P., & Forlin, C. (1996). Legal frameworks for devolution in regular and special education. Australian Journal of Education, 40, 177-189.
23. Forlin, C. I., & Forlin, P. R. (1998a). The legal implications of including students with disabilities in regular schools. In M. Hauritz, C. Sampford, & S. Blencowe (Eds.), Justice for people with disabilities: Assessing legal and institutional responses (pp. 109-126). Brisbane, Australia: Federation Press.
24. Forlin, C., & Forlin, P. (1998b). Constitutional and legislative framework for Inclusive education in Australia. Australian Journal of Education, 42, 204-217.
25. Frederickson, N. L., & Furnham, A. F. (1998). Sociometric-status- group classification of mainstreamed children who have moderate learning difficulties: An Investigation of personal and environmental factors. Journal of Educational Psychology, 90, 772-783.
26. Frost, J., & McKelvie, S. (2004). Self-esteem and body satisfaction in male and female elementary school, high school, and university students. Sex Roles, 51, 45-54.
27. Gans, A. M., Kenny, M. C., & Ghany, D. L. (2003). Comparing the self-concept of students with and without LD. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 36, 287-295.
28. Grolnick, W. S., & Ryan, R. M. (1990). Self-perceptions, motivation, and adjustment in children with LD: A multiple-group comparison study. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 23, 177-184.
29. Harter, S., Whitesell, N. R., & Junkin, L. J. (1998). Similarities and differences in domain-specific and global self-evaluations of learning-disabled, behaviorally disordered, and normally achieving adolescents. American Educational Research Journal, 35, 653-680.
30. Jenkins, J. R., & Heinen, A. (1989). Students' preferences for service delivery: Pull out, in-class or integrated models. Exceptional Children, 55, 516-523.
31. Kelly, N., & Norwich, B, (2004). Pupils' perceptions of self and labels: Moderate learning difficulties in regular and special schools. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 74, 411-435.
32. Kistner, J. A., & Gatlin, D. (1989a). Sociometric differences between learning-disabled and non-handicapped students: Effects of sex and race. Journal of Educational Psychology, 81, 118-120.
33. Kistner, J. A., & Gatlin, D. (1989b). Correlates of peer rejection among children with learning disabilities. Learning Disability Quarterly, 12, 133-140.
34. Kling, K. C., Hyde, J. S., Showers, C. J., & Buswell, B. N. (1999). Gender differences in self-esteem: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 125, 470-500.
35. Kuhne, M., & Wiener, J. (2000). Stability of social status with and without learning disabilities. Learning Disability Quarterly, 23, 64-75.
36. La Greca, A. M., & Stone, W. L. (1990). Learning disabilities status and achievement: confounding variables in the study of children's social status, self-esteem, and behavioral functioning. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 23, 483-490.
37. Larrivee, B. (1985). Effective teaching for successful mainstreaming. New York: Longman.
38. Le Mare, L., & De la Ronde, M. (2000). Links among social status, service delivery mode, and service delivery preference in learning disabilities, low-achieving and normally achieving elementary-aged children. Learning Disability Quarterly, 23, 52-62.
39. Maras, P., & Brown, R. (2000). Effects of different forms of school contact on children's attitudes toward disabled and nondisabled peers. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 70, 337-351.
40. Meijer, C.J.W., Peschar, J. L., & Scheerens, J. (1995). Prikkels [Stimulations]. De Lier, The Netherlands: Academisch Boeken Centrum.
41. Ministerie van Onderwijs & Wetenschappen. (1990). Weer samen naar school. Hoofdlijnennotitie [Together to school again. Main issues]. Den Haag, The Netherlands: SDU.
42. Ministerie van Onderwijs, Cultuur en Wetenschappen. (2000). Voortgangsrapportage Weer Samen Naar School [Continuity report Together to school again]. http//www.minocw.nl
43. Ministerie van Onderwijs, Cultuur en Wetenschappen. (2003). Vijfde voortgangsrapportage Weer Samen Naar School [Fifth continuity report Together to school again]. http//www.minocw.nl
44. Ochoa, S. V., & Olivarez, A. (1995). A meta-analysls of peer rating sociometric studies of pupils with learning disabilities. Journal of Special Education, 29, 1-19.
45. OECD. (1986). Young people with handicaps: The road to adulthood. Paris: Author.
46. Parker, J. G., & Asher, S. R. (1987). Peer relations and later personal adjustment: Are low accepted children at risk? Psychological Bulletin, 102, 357-389.
47. Peetsma, T., Vergeer, M., Roeleveld, J., & Karsten, S. (2001). Inclusion in education: Comparing pupils' development in special and regular education. Educational Review, 53, 125-135.
48. Renick, P. R., & Harter, S. (1989). Impact of social comparisons on the developing self-perceptions of learning disabled students. Journal of Educational Psychology. 81, 631-638.
49. Rosenberg, M. S., Bott, D., Majsterek, D., Chiang, B. Simmons, D., Gartland, D., Wesson, C., Graham, S., Smith-Myles, B., Miller, M., Swanson, H. L, Bender, W., Rivera, D., & Wilson, R. (1994). Minimum standards for the description of participants in learning disabilities research. Remedial and Special Education, 15, 56-59.
50. Scruggs, T. E., & Mastropierl, M. A. (2002). On babies and bathwater: Addressing the problems of identification of LD. Learning Disability Quarterly, 25, 155-168.
51. Smeets, E.F.L. (2003). Op weg naar samenhang. De samenwerkingsverbanden Weer Samen Naar School [Towards coherence. Cooperation units Together to school again] Nijmegen, The Netherlands: ITS.
52. Smits, J.A.E., & Vorst, H.C.M. (1991). Schoolvragenlijst [School questionnaire]. Nijmegen, The Netherlands: Berkhout.
53. Stiehr Smith, D., & Nagle, R. J. (1995). Self-perceptions and social comparisons among children with LD. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 28, 364-371.
54. Stone, W. L., & La Greca, A. M. (1990). The social status of children with learning disabilities: A reexamination. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 23, 32-37.
55. United Nations. (1989). Convention on the Rights of the Child: Adopted by General Assembly resolution 44/25. New York: Author.
56. UNESCO. (1988). UNESCO consultation on special education: Final report. Paris: Author.
57. UNESCO. (1990). World declaration on education for all and framework of action to meet basic learning needs. Paris: Author.
58. Vaughn, S., Elbaum, B. E., & Schumm, J. S. (1996). The effects of inclusion on the social functioning of students with learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 29, 598-608.
59. Vaughn, S., Hogan, A., Haager, D., & Kouzekanani, K. (1992). Self-concept and peer-acceptation in students with LD: A four-to-five year prospective study. Journal of Educational Psychology, 84, 43-50.
60. Veerman, J. W., Straathof, M.A.E., Treffers, P.D.A., van der Berg, B.R.H., & ten Brink, L. T. (1997). Handleiding competentiebelevingsschaal voor hinderen (CBSK) [Manual for The perceived competence scale for children]. Lisse, The Netherlands: Swets & Zeitlinger.
61. Wiener, J., Harris, P. J., & Shirer, C. (1990). Achievement and social-behavioral correlates of peer status in learning disabilities children. Learning Disability Quarterly, 13, 114-127.