The effect of exposure on syntactic parsing in Spanish - English bilinguals

Bilingualism

Volumn 10, Issue 1, 2007, Pages 101-116

  Dussias, Paola E ^a   Sagarra, Nuria ^a  

^a PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 33847783921     PISSN: 13667289     EISSN: 14691841     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1017/S1366728906002847     Document Type: Article

References (69)

1. Abdelghany, H. & Fodor, J. D. (1999). Low attachment of relative clauses in Arabic. Poster presented at Architecture and Mechanisms of Language Processing (AMLaP), Edinburgh, September 23-25.
2. Altmann, G. T. M., Garnham, A. & Dennis, Y. (1992). Avoiding the garden path: Eye movements in context. Journal of Memory and Language, 31, 685-712.
3. Baccino, T., De Vincenzi, M. & Job, R. (2000). Cross-linguistic studies of the late closure strategy: French and Italian. In De Vincenzi & Lombardo (eds.), pp. 89-118.
4. Brysbaert, M. & Mitchell, D. C. (1996). Modifier attachment in sentence processing: Evidence from Dutch. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 49A, 664-695.
5. Carreiras, M. & Clifton, C., Jr. (1993). Relative clause interpretation preferences in Spanish and English. Language and Speech, 36, 353-372.
6. Carreiras, M. & Clifton, C., Jr. (1999). Another word on parsing relative clauses: Eyetracking evidence from Spanish and English. Memory and Cognition, 27, 826-833.
7. Carreiras, M., Salillas, E. & Barber, H. (2004). Event-related potentials elicited during parsing of ambiguous relative clauses in Spanish. Cognitive Brain Research, 20, 98-105.
8. Clifton, C., Jr., Frazier, L. & Rayner, K. (eds.) (1994). Perspectives on sentence processing. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
9. Cuetos, F. & Mitchell, D. C. (1988). Cross-linguistic differences in parsing: Restrictions on the use of the Late Closure strategy in Spanish. Cognition, 30, 73-105.
10. Cuetos, F., Mitchell, D. C. & Corley, M. M. B. (1996). Parsing in different languages. In M. Carreiras, J. E. Garcia-Albea & N. Sebastián-Gallés (eds.), Language processing in Spanish, pp. 145-187. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
11. De Bot, K., Gommans, P. & Rossing, C. (1991). L1 loss in an L2 environment: Dutch immigrants in France. In Seliger & Vago (eds.), pp. 87-98.
12. Desmet, T., Brysbaert, M. & Da Baecke, C. (2002). The correspondence between sentence production and corpus frequencies in modifier attachment. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 55A, 879-896.
13. De Vincenzi, M. & Job, R. (1993). Some observations of the universality of the Late Closure Strategy. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 22, 189-206.
14. De Vincenzi, M. & Job, R. (1995). An investigation of late-closure: The role of syntax, thematic structure and pragmatics in initial and final interpretation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 21, 1303-1321.
15. De Vincenzi, M. & Lombardo, V. (eds.) (2000). Cross-linguistic perspectives on language processing. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Press.
16. Dussias, P. E. (2001). Bilingual sentence parsing. In J. L. Nicol (ed.), One mind, two languages: Bilingual language processing, pp. 159-176. Malden, MA: Blackwell.
17. Dussias, P. E. (2003). Syntactic ambiguity resolution in L2 learners: Some effects of bilinguality on L1 and L2 processing strategies. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 25, 529-557.
18. Ehrlich, K., Fernández, E., Fodor, J. D., Stenshoel, E. & Vinereanu, M. (1999). Low attachment of relative clauses: New data from Swedish, Norwegian and Romanian. Poster presented at the 12th Annual CUNY Conference on Human Sentence Processing, New York, March, 18-20.
19. Felser, C., Roberts, L., Marinis, T. & Gross, R. (2003). The processing of ambiguous sentences by first and second language learners of English. Applied Psycholinguistics, 24, 453-489.
20. Fernández, E. M. (1995). Processing strategies in second language acquisition: Some premilinary results. Paper presented at GASLA-2 (Generative Approaches to Second Language Acquisition), New York, May 4-5.
21. Fernández, E. M. (1999). Processing strategies in second language acquisition: Some preliminary results. In E. Klein & G. Martohardjono (eds.), The development of second language grammars: A generative approach, pp. 217-239. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
22. Fernández, E. M. (2003). Bilingual sentence processing: Relative clause attachment in English and Spanish. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
23. Fodor, J. D. (1998). Learning to parse? Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 27, 285-319.
24. Frazier, L. (1978). On comprehending sentences: Syntactic parsing strategies. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Connecticut.
25. Frazier, L. & Clifton, C., Jr. (1996). Construal. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
26. Frazier, L. & Rayner, K. (1982). Making and correcting errors during sentence comprehension: Eye movements in the analysis of structurally ambiguous sentences. Cognitive Psychology, 14, 178-210.
27. Frenck-Mestre, C. (1997). Examining second language reading: An on-line look. In A. Sorace, C. Heycock & R. Shillcock (eds.), Proceedings of the GALA '97 Conference on Language Acquisition, pp. 444-448. Edinburgh: University of Edinburgh Press.
28. Frenck-Mestre, C. (2002). An on-line look at sentence processing in the second language. In R. R. Heredia & J. Altarriba (eds.), Bilingual sentence processing, pp. 218-236. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
29. Frenck-Mestre, C. (2005). Ambiguities and Anomalies: What can eye movements and event-related potentials reveal about second language sentence processing? In Kroll & de Groot (eds.), pp. 268-281.
30. Frenck-Mestre, C. & Pynte, J. (1997). Syntactic ambiguity resolution while reading in second and native languages. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 50, 119-148.
31. Frenck-Mestre, C. & Pynte, J. (2000a). Romancing syntactic ambiguity: Why the French and the Italians don't see eye to eye. In Kennedy et al. (eds.), pp. 549-564.
32. Frenck-Mestre, C. & Pynte, J. (2000b). Resolving syntactic ambiguities: Cross-linguistic differences? In De Vincenzi & Lombardo (eds.), pp. 119-148.
33. Garnsey, S. M., Pearlmutter, N. J., Myers, E. & Lotocky, M. A. (1997). The contribution of verb bias and plausibility to the comprehension of temporarily ambiguous sentences. Journal of Memory and Language, 37, 58-93.
34. Gibson, E. & Pearlmutter, N. J. (1994). A corpus-based analysis of psycholinguistic constraints on PP attachment. In Clifton et al. (eds.), pp. 181-198.
35. Gibson, E., Pearlmutter, N. J., Canseco-Gonzáles, E. & Hickock, G. (1996). Recency preferences the human sentence processing mechanism. Cognition, 59, 23-59.
36. Gibson, E., Pearlmutter, N. J. & Torrens, V. (1999). Recency and lexical preferences in Spanish. Memory and Cognition, 27, 603-611.
37. Gibson, E., Schütze, C. T. & Salomon, A. (1996). The relationship between the frequency and the processing complexity of linguistic structure. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 25, 59-92.
38. Hemforth, B., Konieczny, L. & Scheepers, C. (2000). Syntactic attachment and anaphorresolution: The two sides of relative clause attachment. In M. W. Crocker, M. Pickering & C. Clifton, Jr. (eds.), Architectures and mechanisms for language processing, pp. 259-281. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
39. Henstra, J. (1996). Relative clause attachment in English: Eyetracking versus self-paced reading. Poster presented at Architecture and Mechanisms of Language Processing (AMLaP), Turin, September 20-21.
40. Hernández, A., Bates, E. & Ávila, L. (1994). On-line sentence interpretation in Spanish-English bilinguals: What does it mean to be "in between"? Applied Psycholinguistics, 15, 417-446.
41. Hoover, M. L. & Dwivedi, V. D. (1998). Syntactic processing in skilled bilinguals. Language Learning, 48, 1-29.
42. Juffs, A. (1998a). Main verb vs. reduced relative clause ambiguity resolution in L2 sentence processing. Language Learning, 48, 107-147.
43. Juffs, A. (1998b). Some effects of first language argument structure and morphosyntax on second language sentence processing. Second Language Research, 14, 406-424.
44. Juffs, A. & Harrington, M. (1995). Parsing effects in second language processing: Subject and object asymmetries in wh-extractions. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 17, 483-516.
45. Juffs, A. & Harrington, M. (1996). Garden-path sentences and error data in second language processing research. Language Learning, 46, 286-324.
46. Kamide, Y. (1998). The role of argument structure requirements and recency constraints in human sentence processing. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Exeter.
47. Kennedy, A., Radach, R., Heller, D. & Pynte, J. (eds.) (2000), Reading as a perceptual process. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
48. Kroll, J. F. & de Groot, A. M. B. (eds.) (2005). Handbook of bilingualism: Psycholinguistic perspectives. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
49. Kroll, J. F. & Dussias, P. E. (2004). The comprehension of words and sentences in two languages. In T. Bhatia & W. Ritchie (eds.), The handbook of bilingualism, pp. 169-200. Malden, MA: Blackwell.
50. Love, T., Maas, E. & Swinney, D. (2003). The influence of language exposure on lexical and syntactic language processing. Experimental Psychology, 50, 204-216.
51. MacDonald, M. C., Pearlmutter, N. J. & Seidenberg, M. S. (1994a). Syntactic ambiguity resolution as lexical ambiguity resolution. In Clifton et al. (eds.), pp. 123-153.
52. MacDonald, M. C., Pearlmutter, N. J. & Seidenberg, M. S. (1994b). The lexical nature of syntactic ambiguity resolution. Psychological Review, 101, 676-703.
53. Marinis, T., Roberts, L., Felser, C. & Clahsen, H. (2005). Gaps in second language sentence processing. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 27, 53-78.
54. Mitchell, D. C. (2004). On-line methods in language processing: Introduction and historical Review. In M. Carreiras & C. Clifton, Jr. (eds.), The on-line study of sentence comprehension, pp. 15-32. New York: Psychology Press.
55. Mitchell, D. C. & Brysbaert, M. (1998). Challenges to recent theories of cross-linguistic variation in parsing: Evidence from Dutch. In D. Hillert (ed.), Sentence processing: A cross-linguistic perspective, pp. 313-355. New York: Academic Press.
56. Mitchell, D. C., Brysbaert, M., Grondelaers, S. & Swanepoel, P. (2000). Modifier attachment in Dutch: Testing aspects of the construal theory. In Kennedy et al. (eds.), pp. 493-516.
57. Mitchell, D. C. & Cuetos, F. (1991). Restrictions on late closure: The computational underpinnings of parsing strategies in Spanish and English. Ms., University of Exeter.
58. Mitchell, D. C., Cuetos, F. & Corley, M. M. B. (1992). Statistical versus linguistic determinants of parsing bias: Crosslinguistic evidence. Paper presented at the 5th Annual CUNY conference on Human Sentence Processing, New York, March 19-21.
59. Miyamoto, E. T. (1998). A low attachment preference in Brazilian Portuguese relative clauses. Paper presented at Architecture and Mechanisms of Language Processing (AMLaP), Friburg, September 24-26.
60. Papadopoulou, D. (2005). Reading time studies of second language ambiguity resolution. Second Language Research, 21, 98-120.
61. Papadopoulou, D. & Clahsen, H. (2003). Parsing strategies in L1 and L2 sentence processing: A study of relative clause attachment in Greek. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 25, 501-528.
62. Pynte, J. & Colonna, S. (2000). Decoupling syntactic parsing from visual inspection: The case of relative clause attachment in French. In Kennedy et al. (eds.), pp. 529-547.
63. Rayner, K., Sereno, S. C., Morris, R. K., Schmauder, A. R. & Clifton, C., Jr. (1989). Eye-movement and online sentence comprehension processes. Language and Cognitive Processes, 4, 21-49.
64. Schwartz, A. I., Kroll, J. F. & Diaz, M. (under revision). Reading words in Spanish and English: Mapping orthography to phonology in two languages. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review.
65. Seliger, H. W. & Vago, R. M. (1991). First language attrition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
66. Thornton, R., MacDonald, M. C. & Gil, M. (1999). Pragmatic constraint on the interpretation of complex noun phrases in Spanish and English. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 25, 1347-1365.
67. Trueswell, J. C., Tanenhaus, M. K. & Garnsey, S. M. (1994). Semantic influences on parsing: Use of thematic role information in syntactic ambiguity resolution. Journal of Memory and Language, 33, 285-318.
68. Williams, J., Möbius, P. & Kim, C. (2001). Native and non-native processing of English wh-questions: Parsing strategies and plausibility constraints. Applied Psycholinguistics, 22, 509-540.
69. Zagar, D., Pynte, J. & Rativeau, S. (1997). Evidence for early closure attachment on first-pass reading times in French. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 50A, 421-438.