Reading-time studies of second language ambiguity resolution

Second Language Research

Volumn 21, Issue 2, 2005, Pages 98-120

  Papadopoulou, Despina ^a  

^a ARISTOTLE UNIVERSITY OF THESSALONIKI   (Greece)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 17644387621     PISSN: 02676583     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1191/0267658305sr254oa     Document Type: Article

References (60)

1. Altmann, G.T.M. 1998: Ambiguity in sentence processing. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 24, 146-152.
2. Baccino, T., De Vincenzi, M. and Job, R. 2000: Cross-linguistic studies of the Late Closure strategy: French and Italian. In De Vincenzi, M. and Lombardo, V., editors, Cross-linguistic perspectives on language processing. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic, 89-118.
3. Chaudron, C. 1985: Intake: On models and methods for discovering learners' processing of input. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 7, 1-14.
4. Crocker, M. 1996: Computational psycholinguistics. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
5. Cuetos, F., Mitchell, D. and Corley, M.M.B. 1996: Parsing in different languages. In Carreiras, M., Garcia-Albea, J. and Sebastian-Galles, N., editors, Language processing in Spanish. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum, 145-90.
6. De Vincenzi, M. and Job, R. 1993: Some observations on the universality of the late-closure strategy. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 22, 189-206.
7. _ 1995: An investigation of late-closure: The role of syntax, thematic structure, and pragmatics in initial and final interpretation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 21, 1303-21.
8. Dussias, P. 2001: Sentence parsing in fluent Spanish-English bilinguals. In Nicol, J.L., editor, One mind, two languages: bilingual language processing. Cambridge, MA: Blackwell, 159-76.
9. _ 2003: Syntactic ambiguity resolution in second language learners: some effects of bilinguality on L1 and L2 processing strategies. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 25, 529-57.
10. Favreau, M. and Segalowitz, N. 1982: Second language reading in fluent bilinguals. Applied Psycholinguistics 3, 329-41.
11. _ 1983: Automatic and controlled processes in reading a second language. Memory and Cognition 11, 656-74.
12. Felser, C., Roberts, L., Gross, R. and Marinis, T. 2003: The processing of ambiguous sentences by first and second language learners of English. Applied Psycholinguistics 24, 453-89.
13. Fernández, E. 1999: Processing strategies in second language acquisition: some preliminary results. In Klein, E. and Martohardjono G., editors, The development of second language grammars: a generative approach. Amsterdam: Benjamins, 217-39.
14. _ 2003: Bilingual sentence processing: relative clause attachment in English and Spanish. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
15. Ferreira, F. and Clifton, C. Jr. 1986: The Independence of syntactic processing. Journal of Memory and Language 25, 348-68.
16. Fodor, J.D. 1998: Learning to parse? Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 27, 285-319.
17. _ 1999: Learnability theory: triggers for parsing with. In Klein, E. and Martohardjono, G., editors, The development of second language grammars: a generative approach. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 363-406.
18. Frazier, L. 1987: Theories of sentence processing. In Garfield, J., editor, Modularity in knowledge representation and natural language understanding. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 291-307.
19. Frazier, L. and Clifton, C. 1996: Construal. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
20. Frazier, L. and Fodor, J.D. 1978: The sausage machine: a new two-stage parsing model. Cognition 6, 291-325.
21. Frenck-Mestre, C. 2002: An on-line look at sentence processing in the second language. In Heredia, R.R. and Altarriba, J., editors, Bilingual sentence processing. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 218-36.
22. Frenck-Mestre, C. and Pynte, J. 1997: Syntactic ambiguity resolution while reading in second and native languages. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 50A, 119-48.
23. _ J. 2000: Resolving syntactic ambiguities: cross-linguistic differences? In De Vincenzi, M. and Lombarde, V., editors, Cross-linguistic perspectives on language processing. Dordrecht: Kluwer, 119-48.
24. Gibson, E., Pearlmutter, N., Canseco-Gonzalez, E. and Hickock, G. 1996: Recency preferences in the human sentence processing mechanism. Cognition 59, 23-59.
25. Gilboy, E., Sopena, J.M., Clifton, C. and Frazier, L. 1995: Argument structure and association preferences in Spanish and English compound NPs. Cognition 54, 131-67.
26. Gorrell, P. 1995: Syntax and parsing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
27. Harrington, M. 2001: Sentence processing. In Robinson, P., editor, Cognition and second language instruction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 91-124.
28. Hemforth, B., Konieczny, L., Scheepers, C. and Strube, G. 1998: Syntactic ambiguity resolution in German. In Hillert, D., editor, Sentence processing: a crosslinguistic perspective. Syntax and Semantics: volume 31. San Diego, CA: Academic Press, 292-312.
29. Juffs, A. 1998a: Main verb vs. reduced relative clause ambiguity resolution in L2 sentence processing. Language Learning 48, 107-47.
30. _ 1998b: Some effects of first language argument structure and morphosyntax on second language processing. Second Language Research 14, 406-24.
31. _ 2001: Psycholinguistically oriented second language research. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics 21, 207-20.
32. Juffs, A. and Harrington, M. 1995: Parsing effects in second language sentence processing: subject and object asymmetries in wh-extraction. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 17, 483-516.
33. _ 1996: Garden-path sentences and error data in second language processing research. Language Learning 46, 286-324.
34. Just, M.A., Carpenter, P.A. and Woolley, J.D. 1982: Paradigms and processes in reading comprehension. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 111, 228-38.
35. Klein, E. 1999: Just parsing through: notes on the state of L2 processing research today. In Klein, E. and Martohardjono, G., editors, The development of second language grammars: a generative approach. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 197-216.
36. Klein, E. and Martohardjono, R. 1999: Investigating second language grammars: some conceptual and methodological issues in generative SLA research. In Klein, E. and Martohardjono, G., editors, The development of second language grammars: a generative approach. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 3-34.
37. MacDonald, M.C. 1994: Probabilistic constraints and syntactic ambiguity resolution. Language and Cognitive Processes 9, 195-201.
38. _ 1997: Lexical representations and sentence processing: an introduction. Language and Cognitive Processes 122/3, 121-36.
39. MacDonald, M.C., Pearlmutter, N. and Seidenberg, M.S. 1994: The lexical nature of syntactic ambiguity resolution. Psychological Review 101, 676-703.
40. MacWhinney, B. 1987: Applying the competition model to bilingualism. Applied Psycholinguistics 8, 315-27.
41. _ 1997: Second language acquisition and the competition model. In Kroll, J. and De Groot, A., editors, Second language acquisition. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum, 113-42.
42. _ 2001: The competition model: the input, the context and the brain. In Robinson, P., editor, Cognition and second language instruction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 69-90.
43. Marinis, T. 2003: Psycholinguistic techniques in second language acquisition research. Second Language Research 192, 144-61.
44. Mitchell, D.C. 1987: Lexical guidance in human parsing: locus and processing characteristics. In Coltheart, M., editor, Attention and performance XII: the psychology of reading. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum, 601-18.
45. _ 1994: Sentence parsing. In Gernsbacher, M.A., editor, Handbook of psycholinguistics. San Diego, CA: Academic Press, 375-409.
46. Mitchell, D.C. and Green, D.W. 1978: The effects of context and content of immediate processing in reading. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 30, 690-36.
47. Mitchell, D.C., Cuetos, F., Corley, M.B. and Brysbaert, M. 1995: Exposure-based models of human parsing: evidence for the use of coarse-grained nonlexical statistical records. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 24, 469-88.
48. Papadopoulou, D. 2002: Cross-linguistic variation in sentence processing: evidence from relative clause attachment preferences in Greek. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Essex, UK.
49. Papadopoulou, D. and Clahsen, H. 2003: Parsing strategies in L1 and L2 sentence processing: a study of relative clause attachment in Greek. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 25, 501-28.
50. Pickering, M. 1999: Sentence comprehension. In Garrod, S. and Pickering, M, editors, Language processing. Hove: Psychology Press, 123-53.
51. Pritchett, B.L. 1988: Garden-path phenomena and the grammatical basis of language processing. Language 64, 539-76.
52. _ 1992: Parsing with grammar: Islands, heads, and garden paths. In Goodluck, H. and Rochemont, M., editors, Island constraints: theory, acquisition, and processing. Dordrecht: Kluwer, 321-49.
53. Rayner, K. and Pollatsek, S. 1987: Eye movements in reading: A tutorial review. In Coltheart, M., editor, Attention and performance XII: the psychology of reading. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum, 327-62.
54. Rayner, K., Sereno, S.C., Morris, R.K., Schmauder, A.R. and Clifton, C. Jr. 1989: Eye movements and on-line language comprehension processes. Language and Cognitive Processes 4, 21-49.
55. Segalowitz, N. 1986: Skilled reading in the second language. In Vaid, J., editor, Language processing in bilinguals: psycholinguistic and neuro-physiological perspectives. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum, 3-19.
56. Thornton, R., Gil, M. and MacDonald, M. 1998: Accounting for cross-linguistic variation: A constraint-based perspective. In Hillert, D. editor, Sentence processing: a crosslinguistic perspective. Syntax and Semantics volume 31. San Diego, CA: Academic Press, 211-23.
57. Thornton, R., MacDonald, M. and Gil, M. 1999: Pragmatic constraints on the interpretation of complex noun phrases in Spanish and English. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 256, 1347-65.
58. Traxler, M. 2002: Plausibility and subcategorization preference in children's processing of temporarily ambiguous sentences: Evidence from self-paced reading. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 55A, 75-96.
59. Traxler, M.J., Pickering, M.J. and Clifton, C. 1998: Adjunct attachment is not a form of lexical ambiguity resolution. Journal of Memory and Language 39, 558-92.
60. White, L. 1991: Second language competence v. second language performance: UG or processing strategies? In Eubank, L., editor, Point counterpoint: universal grammar in the second language. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 167-89.