Processing and representing temporal information in narrative text

Discourse Processes

Volumn 43, Issue 2, 2007, Pages 173-200

  Therriault, David J ^a   Raney, Gary E ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT CHICAGO   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 33847735376     PISSN: 0163853X     EISSN: 15326950     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1207/s15326950dp4302_4     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Albrecht, J. E., & O'Brien, E. J. (1995). Goal processing and the maintenance of global coherence. In R. F. Lorch & E. J. O'Brien (Eds.), Sources of coherence in reading, (pp. 263-278). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
2. Anderson, A., Garrod, S. C., & Sanford, A. J. (1983). The accessibility of pronominal antecedents as a function of episode shifts in narrative text. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 35, 427-440.
3. Bestgen, Y., & Vonk, W. (1995). The role of temporal segmentation markers in discourse processing. Discourse Processes, 19, 385-406.
4. Block, R. A. (Ed.). (1990). Cognitive models of time. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
5. Cote, N., Goldman, S. R., & Saul, E. U. (1998). Students making sense of informational text: Relations between processing and representation. Discourse Processes, 25, 1-53.
6. Cote, N., Goldman, S. R., & Saul, E. U. (1999). Building representations of informational text: Evidence from children's think-aloud protocols. In S. R. Goldman & H. Oostendorp (Eds.), The construction of mental representations during reading (pp. 169-194). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
7. Ericsson, K. A., & Simon, H. A., (1993). Protocol analysis: Verbal reports as data (Rev. ed.). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
8. Fletcher, C. R., & Chrysler, S. T. (1990). Surface forms, textbases, and situational models: Recognition memory for three types of textual information. Discourse Processes, 13, 175-190.
9. Fraisse, P. (1963). The psychology of time. New York: Harper & Row.
10. Friedman, W. (1990). About time. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
11. Harnish, R. M. (1976). Reading comprehension and readability in educational practice and psychological theory. In T. G. Bever, J. J. Katz, & D. T. Langendoen (Eds.), An integrated theory of linguistic ability (pp. 313-391). New York: Crowell.
12. Kintsch, W., Welsch, D., Schmalhofer, F., & Zimny, S. (1990). Sentence memory: A theoretical analysis. Journal of Memory and Language, 29, 133-159.
13. Labov, W. (1972). Language in the inner city: Studies in the black English vernacular. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
14. Labov, W., & Waletzky, J. (1967). Narrative analysis: Oral versions of personal experience. In J. Helm (Ed.), Essays on the verbal and visual arts (pp. 12-44). Seattle: University of Washington Press.
15. Lutz, M. F., & Radvansky, G. A. (1997). The fate of completed goal information. Journal of Memory and Language, 36, 293-310.
16. Magliano, J. P., & Schleich, M. C. (2000). Verb aspect and situation models. Discourse Processes, 29, 83-112.
17. Magliano, J. P., Trabasso, T., & Graesser, A. C. (1999). Strategic processing during comprehension. Journal of Educational Psychology, 91, 615-629.
18. Ohtsuka, K., & Brewer, W. F. (1992). Discourse organization in the comprehension of temporal order in narrative text. Discourse Processes, 15, 317-336.
19. Ornstein, R. (1972). The psychology of consciousness. San Francisco: Freeman.
20. Ornstein, R. (1997). On the experience of time. Boulder, CO: Westview.
21. Rinck, M., Gámez, E., Díaz, J. M., & de Vega, M. (2003). Processing of temporal information: Evidence from eye movements. Memory & Cognition, 31, 77-86.
22. Rinck, M., Hahnel, A., & Becker, G. (2001). Using temporal information to construct, update, and retrieve situation models of narratives. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 27, 67-80.
23. Schooler, J. W., Ohlsson, S., & Brooks, K. (1992). Thoughts beyond words: When language overshadows insight. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 122, 166-183.
24. Scott Rich, S., & Taylor, H. A. (2000). Not all narrative shifts function equally. Journal of Memory and Cognition, 28, 1257-1266.
25. Singer, M., & Richards, E. (2005). Representing complex narrative goal structures: Competing memory based and situational influences. Discourse Processes, 39, 189-204.
26. Speer, S. R., & Clifton, C. (1998). Plausibility and argument structure in sentence comprehension. Memory & Cognition, 26, 965-978.
27. Suh. S., & Trabasso, T. (1993). Inferencing during reading: Converging evidence from discourse analysis, talk-aloud protocols, and recognition priming. Journal of Memory and Language, 32, 279-300.
28. ter Meulen, A. G. B. (1995). Representing time in natural language: The dynamic interpretation of tense and aspect. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
29. Trabasso, T., & Magliano, J. P. (1996). Conscious understanding during comprehension. Discourse Processes, 21, 255-287.
30. Trabasso, T., & Suh, S. Y. (1993). Understanding text: Achieving explanatory power coherence through on-line inferences and mental operations in working memory. Discourse Processes, 16, 3-34.
31. van Dijk, T. A., & Kintsch, W. (1983). Strategies of discourse comprehension. New York: Academic.
32. Zabrucky, K. (1990). Evaluation of understanding in college students: Effects of text structure and reading proficiency. Journal of Reading Research and Instruction, 29, 46-54.
33. Zwaan, R. A. (1996). Processing narrative time shifts. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 22, 1196-1207.
34. Zwaan, R. A., Langston, M. C., & Graesser, A. C. (1995). The construction of situation models in narrative comprehension: an event-indexing model. Psychological Science, 6, 292-297.
35. Zwaan, R. A., & Radvansky, G. A. (1998). Situation models in language comprehension and memory. Psychological Bulletin, 123, 162-185.
36. Zwaan, R. A., Radvansky, G. A., Hilliard, A. E., & Curiel, J. M. (1998) Constructing multidimensional situation models during reading. Scientific Studies of Reading, 2, 199-220.