Project team selection using fuzzy optimization approach

Cybernetics and Systems

Volumn 38, Issue 2, 2007, Pages 155-185

  Baykasoglu, Adil ^a   Dereli, Turkay ^a   Das, Sena ^a  

^a GAZIANTEP UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

C (PROGRAMMING LANGUAGE); CONSTRAINT THEORY; LINGUISTICS; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; MOTIVATION; OPTIMIZATION; PROBLEM SOLVING; PROJECT MANAGEMENT;

FUZZY OPTIMIZATION; FUZZY RATINGS; LINGUISTIC VARIABLES; PROJECT TEAM SELECTION;

FUZZY CONTROL;

EID: 33847408811     PISSN: 01969722     EISSN: 10876553     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/01969720601139041     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Baykasoglu, A. and N. N. Z. Gindy. 2001. A simulated annealing algorithm for dynamic layout problem. Computers and Operations Research, 28:1403-1426.
2. Baykasoglu, A. and T. Sevim. 2003. A review and classification of fuzzy approaches to multi objective optimization. In Proceeding of TAINN'2003, International Twelfth Turkish Symposium on Artificial Intelligence and Neural Networks, Vol. E6. Çanakkale: Turkey, pp. 578-580.
3. Bellman, R. E. and L. A. Zadeh. 1970. Decision-making in a fuzzy environment. Management Science, 17:141-164.
4. Boon, B. H. and G. Sierksma. 2003. Team formation: Matching quality supply and quality demand. European Journal of Operational Research, 148:277-292.
5. Butterfield, J. and N. Pendegraft. 1996. Gaming techniques to improve the team-formation process. Team Performance Management, 2(4): 11-20.
6. Castka, P., C. J. Bamber, J. M. Sharp, and P. Belohoubek. 2001. Factors affecting successful implementation of high performance teams. Team Performance Management, 7:123-134.
7. Chen, S. J. and L. Lin. 2004. Modeling team member characteristics for the formation of a multifunctional team in concurrent engineering. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 51(2):111-124.
8. Chen, Y. H. 1996. Fuzzy ratings in mechanical engineering design-application to bearing selection. Proceedings of Institution of Mechanical Engineerrs, 210:49-53.
9. Cohen, S. G. and D. E. Bailey. 1997. What makes teams work: Group effectiveness research from the shop floor to the executive suite. Journal of Management, 23(3):239-290.
10. Creighton, J. L. 2006. Working effectively in teams, www.spd.usace.army. mil.
11. de Korwin, A., M. Shipley, and R. Kleyle. 2002. Utilizing fuzzy compatibility of skill sets for team selection in multi-phase projects. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 19:307-319.
12. Dereli, T. and A. Baykasoglu. 2006. A team-oriented cybernetic approach for value-added quality auditing. Cybernetics and Systems: An International Journal, 37:311-327.
13. Dubois, D. and H. Prade. 1978. Operations on fuzzy numbers. International Journal of Systems Science, 9(6):613-626.
14. Dyer, W. G. 1994. Team building. Boston: Addison-Wesley.
15. Hofer, S. 1996. Project management expertise through simulation. Cybernetics and Systems: An International Journal, 27:169-182.
16. Hollenbeck, J. R., D. S. DeRue, and R. Guzzo. 2004. Bridging the gap between I/O research and HR practice: Improving team composition, team training, and team task design. Human Resource Management, 43(4):353-366.
17. Katzenbach, J. R. and D. K. Smith. 1993. The wisdom of teams. New York: Harvard Business School Press.
18. Karsak, E. E. 2000. A fuzzy multiple objective programming approach for personnel selection. Proceedings of the 2000 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics. IEEE Press, Nashville Tennessee: pp. 2007-2012.
19. Kinlaw, D. C. 1991. Developing superior work teams. San Diego, California: Lexington Books.
20. Kirkpatrick, S., C. D. Gelatt Jr., and M. P. Vecchi. 1983. Optimisation by simulated annealing. Science, 220:671-680.
21. Liang, G. S. and M. J. J. Wang. 1992. Personnel placement in a fuzzy environment. Computers and Operations Research, 19:107-121.
22. McClurg, L. N. 2001. Team rewards: How far have we come? Human Resource Management, Spring:73-86.
23. Ross, T. J. 1995. Fuzzy logic with engineering applications. New York: McGraw-Hill.
24. Rutenbar, R. A. 1989. Simulated annealing algorithms: An overview. IEEE Circuits and Devices Magazine, 89:19-26.
25. Schepman, S., D. Fennerty, and A. Stahelski. 2003. The group development metric: an applied measurement instrument. National Social Science Journal, 20:13-118.
26. Smith, K. A. 2000. Project management and teamwork. New York: McGraw-Hill.
27. Soliman, F. and E. Gide. 1998. Intelligent manufacturing management through 'team building'. Proceedings of 2nd International Symposium on Intelligent Manufacturing Systems. Sakarya, Turkey, pp. 823-833.
28. Sommerville, J. and S. Dalziel. 1998. Project teambuilding-the applicability of Belbin's team-role self-perception inventory. Journal of Project Management, 16:165-171.
29. Stock, R. 2004. Drivers of team performance: What do we know and what have we still to learn? Schmalenbach Business Review, 56:274-306.
30. Stough, S., S. Eom, and J. Buckenmyer. 2000. Virtual teaming: a strategy for moving your organization into the new millennium. Industrial Management and Data Systems, 100:370-378.
31. Tuckman, B. W. 1965. Development sequence in small groups. Psychological Bulletin, 63:348-399.
32. Yaakob, S. B. and S. Kawata. 1999. Workers' placement in an industrial environment. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 106:289-297.
33. Zadeh, L. A. 1965. Fuzzy sets. Information and Control, 8:338-353.
34. Zadeh, L. A. 1975. The concept of a linguistic variable and its application to approximate reasoning-II. Information Science, 8:301-357.
35. Zakarian, A. and A. Kusiak. 1999. Forming teams: An analytical approach. IIE Transactions, 31:85-97.
36. Zimmermann, H. J. 1976. Description and optimization of fuzzy systems. Fuzzy Systems, 2:209-215.