Factors explaining faculty technology use and productivity

Internet and Higher Education

Volumn 10, Issue 1, 2007, Pages 41-52

 

^a Jade)   (United States)

Author keywords

Email; Faculty; Faculty productivity; Instruction; Technology; Web

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER AIDED INSTRUCTION; DISTANCE EDUCATION; ELECTRONIC MAIL; ONLINE SYSTEMS; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; WORLD WIDE WEB;

FACULTY; FACULTY PRODUCTIVITY; HIERARCHICAL REGRESSION ANALYSIS;

TEACHING;

EID: 33847408278     PISSN: 10967516     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.iheduc.2006.10.004     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Arabasz P., Pirani J.A., and Fawcett D. Supporting e-learning in higher education (2003), ECAR Educause Center for Applied Research, Boulder, CO
2. Biglan A. Relationships between subject matter characteristics and the structure and output of university departments. Journal of Applied Psychology 57 3 (1973) 204-213
3. Bland C.J., Center B.A., Finstad D.A., Risbey K.R., and Staples J. The impact of appointment type on the productivity and commitment of full-time faculty in research and doctoral institutions. The Journal of Higher Education 77 1 (2006) 89-123
4. Bloland H.G. The end(s) of academic labor. The Review of Higher Education 23 1 (1999) 107-118
5. Braxton J.M., and Hargens L.L. Variation among academic disciplines: Analytic frameworks and research. In: Smart J.C. (Ed). Higher education: Handbook of theory and research Vol. 11 (1996), Agathon Press, New York 1-46
6. Crooks S.M., Yang Y., and Duemer L.S. Faculty perceptions of web-based resources in higher education. Journal of Educational Technology Systems 31 2 (2002-2003) 102-113
7. Dillon W.R., and Goldstein M. Multivariate analysis: Methods and applications (1984), John Wiley & Sons, New York
8. Duderstadt J.J., Atkins D.E., and Houweling D.V. Higher education in the digital age (2002), American Council on Education, New York
9. Duderstadt, J.J., Wulf, W.A., & Zemsky, R. (2005). Envisioning a transformed university. Issues in Science and Technology, 22 (1). Retrieved February 20, 2006 from http://www.issues.org/issues/22.1/duderstadt.html
10. Fairweather J.S. Faculty work and public trust (1996), Allyn and Bacon, Boston, MA
11. Fairweather J.S. The mythologies of faculty productivity: Implications for institutional policy and decision making. The Journal of Higher Education 73 1 (2002) 26-48
12. Fredericksen E., Pickett A., Shea P., Pelz W., and Swan K. Factors influencing faculty satisfaction with asynchronous teaching and learning in the SUNY Learning Network. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks 4 3 (2000). http://www.sloan-c.org/publications/jaln/v4n3/v4n3_fredericksen.asp (Retrieved April 19, 2006 from http://www.sloan-c.org/publications/jaln/v4n3/v4n3_fredericksen.asp)
13. Green, K. C. (1999). The 1999 National Survey of Information Technology in US Higher Education. Retrieved April 19, 2006 from http://www.campuscomputing.net/summaries/1999/index.html
14. Green, K. C. (2002). Coming of age in academe. Converge magazine. [http://www.convergemag.com/magazine/story.phtml?id=29718].
15. Green, K. C. (2004). The 2004 National Survey of Information Technology in US Higher Education. Retrieved April 19, 2006 from http://www.campuscomputing.net/summaries/2004/index.html
16. Green, K. C. (2005). The 2005 National Survey of Information Technology in US Higher Education. Retrieved April 19, 2006 from http://www.campuscomputing.net/summaries/2005/index.html
17. Hartman J., Dziuban C., and Moskal P. Faculty satisfaction in ALNs: A dependent or independent variable?. Journal of Asynchronous Networks 4 3 (2000). http://www.aln.org/publications/jaln/v4n3/pdf/v4n3_hartman.pdf (Retrieved April 19, 2006 from http://www.aln.org/publications/jaln/v4n3/pdf/v4n3_hartman.pdf).
18. Immerwahr, J. (1999). Taking responsibility. National Center for Public Policy and Higher Education. National Center Report #99-1. Retrieved March 27, 2006 from http://www.highereducation.org/reports/responsibility/responsibility.pdf
19. Immerwahr, J., & Foleno, T. (2000). Great expectations: How the public views higher education. National Center for Public Policy and Higher Education. Retrieved March 27, 2006 from http://www.highereducation.org/reports/expectations/expectations.shtml
20. Meyer, K.A. (1998). Faculty workload studies: Perspectives, needs, and future directions. ASHE-ERIC Higher Education Report Volume 26(1). Washington, DC: George Washington University.
21. Middaugh M.F. Understanding faculty productivity (2001), Jossey-Bass, San Francisco
22. Mossberger K., Tolbert C.J., and Stansbury M. Virtual inequality (2003), Georgetown University Press, Washington, DC
23. National Education Association. Quality on the line (2000), Institute for Higher Education Policy, Washington, DC
24. Prensky M. Digital natives, digital immigrants. On the Horizon 9 5 (2001) 1-6
25. Smart J.C. A causal model of faculty turnover intentions. Research in Higher Education 31 5 (1990) 405-424
26. Spotts T.H. Discriminating factors in faculty use of instructional technology in higher education. Educational Technology and Society 2 4 (1999). http://ifets.massey.ac.nz/periodical/vol_4_99/spotts.html (Retrieved April 19, 2006 from http://ifets.massey.ac.nz/periodical/vol_4_99/spotts.html).
27. State Higher Education Executive Officers. Focus on higher education faculty. Network News 19 4 (2000). http://www.sheeo.org/network/netnews/nn-v19Z-n4.pdf (Retrieved March 27, 2006 from http://www.sheeo.org/network/netnews/nn-v19Z-n4.pdf).
28. Thomas S.L., and Heck R.H. Analysis of large-scale secondary data in higher education research: Potential perils associated with complex sampling designs. Research in Higher Education 42 5 (2001) 517-540
29. Van Dusen, G.C. (1998). Technology: Higher education's magic bullet. The NEA Higher Education Journal. Retrieved April 21, 2006 from http://www2.nea.org/he/heta98/s98pg59.pdf
30. Zhou Y., and Volkwein J.F. Examining the influences on faculty departure intentions: A comparison of tenured versus nontenured faculty at research universities using NSOPF:99. Research in Higher Education 45 2 (2004) 139-176