Managing urban growth with urban growth boundaries: A theoretical analysis

Journal of Urban Economics

Volumn 46, Issue 1, 1999, Pages 53-68

  Ding, Chengri ^a   Knaap, Gerrit J ^b   Hopkins, Lewis D ^b  

^a CLEVELAND STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT URBANA CHAMPAIGN   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0033160035     PISSN: 00941190     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1006/juec.1998.2111     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. 1. American Planning Association, Growing Smart Legislative Guidebook: Model Statutes for Planning and Management of Change, Phase I interim edition, APA, Chicago, IL (1997).
2. 2. W. J. Baumol, The transactions demand for cash: an inventory theoretic approach, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 66, 545-556 (1952).
3. 3. J. K. Brueckner, Growth controls and land values in an open city, Land Economics, 66, 237-248 (1990).
4. 4. J. K. Brueckner, Infrastructure financing and urban development: the economics of impact fees, Journal of Public Economics, 66, 383-407 (1997).
5. 5. M. Cho, Congestion effect of spatial growth restrictions: a model and empirical analysis, Real Estate Economics, 25(3), 409-438 (1997).
6. 6. A. Dixit, J. Mirrlees, and N. Stern, Optimal saving with economies of scale, Review of Economic Studies, 42, 303-325 (1975).
7. 7. V. G. Easley, Staying Inside the Lines: Urban Growth Boundaries, Planning Advisory Service Report #440, American Planning Association, Chicago, IL (1992).
8. 8. R. Engle, P. Navarro, and R. Carson, On the theory of growth controls, Journal of Urban Economics, 32, 269-283 (1992).
9. 9. W. Fischel, What do Economists Know about Growth Controls: A Research Review in "Understanding Growth Management: Critical Issues and A Research Agenda," (D. Brower, D. Godschalk, and D. Porter, Eds.), The Urban Land Institute, Washington, DC (1991).
10. 10. J. Friedenfields, "Capacity Expansion: Analysis of Simple Models with Applications," North Holland, New York (1981).
11. 11. K. E. Haynes and A. Krmenec, A sensitivity assessment of uncertainty in infrastructure expansion, The Annals of Regional Science, 23, 299-309 (1989).
12. 12. M. Intriligator and E. Sheshinski, Toward a Theory of Planning, in "Social Choice and Public Decision Making," (W. Heller, R. Starr, and D. Starrett, Eds.), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK (1986).
13. 13. E. Kaiser, D. Godschalk, and F. S. Chapin, "Urban Land Use Planning," (4th ed.), University of Illinois Press, Urbana, IL (1995).
14. 14. G. Knaap and A. C. Nelson, "The Regulated Landscape: Lessons on State Land Use Planning from Oregon," Lincoln Institute of Land Policy, Cambridge, MA (1992).
15. 15. C. M. Lee and M. Fujita, Efficient Configuration of a Greenbelt: Theoretical Modeling of Greenbelt Amenity, Environment and Planning A, 29, 1999-2017 (1997).
16. 16. A. Manne, Ed., "Investment for Capacity Expansion, Size, Location and Time Phasing," MIT Press, Cambridge, MA (1967).
17. 17. D. H. Moreau and T. Snyder, "Financial burdens and economic costs in expanding urban water systems, Water Resources Research, 23, 1139-1144 (1987).
18. 18. T. H. Oum and Y. Zhang, Airport pricing: congestion tolls, lumpy investment, and cost recovery, Journal of Public Economics, 43, 353-374 (1990).
19. 19. R. Peiser, Calculating equity-neutral water and sewer impact fees, Journal of the American Planning Association, 54, 38-48 (1988).
20. 20. A. C. Nelson and J. B. Duncan, Growth Management: Principles and Practice, American Planning Association, Chicago, IL (1995).
21. 21. R. Turvey, Analyzing the marginal cost of water supply, Land Economics, 52(2), 158-168 (1976).
22. 22. M. L. Weitzman, Optimum Growth with Scale Economies in the Creation of Overhead Capital, Review of Economic Studies, 37, 555-570 (1970).
23. 23. O. E. Williamson, Peak-Load Pricing and Optimal Capacity under Indivisibility Constraints, American Economic Review, 56, 810-827 (1966).
24. 24. S. M. White, Adequate Public Facilities Ordinances and Transportation Management, Planning Advisory Service Report #465, American Planning Association, Chicago, IL (1996).