Testing for Strategic Interaction Among Local Governments: The Case of Growth Controls

Journal of Urban Economics

Volumn 44, Issue 3, 1998, Pages 438-467

  Brueckner, Jan K ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT URBANA CHAMPAIGN   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0000736885     PISSN: 00941190     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1006/juec.1997.2078     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. Anselin L. Spatial Econometrics: Methods and Models. 1988;Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht.
2. Anselin L. SpaceStat: A Program for the Analysis of Spatial Data. 1992;University of CaliforniaNational Center for Geographic Information and Analysis, Santa Barbara.
3. L. Anselin, A. K. Bera, Spatial dependence in linear regression models with an introduction to spatial econometrics, University of Illinois, 1996.
4. Anselin L., Bera A. K., Florax R., Yoon M. J. Simple diagnostic tests for spatial dependence. Regional Science and Urban Economics. 26:1996;77-104.
5. Besley T., Case A. Incumbent behavior: Vote-seeking, tax-setting, and yardstick competition. American Economic Review. 85:1995;25-45.
6. Brueckner J. K. Growth controls and land values in an open city. Land Economics. 66:1990;237-248.
7. Brueckner J. K. Strategic control of growth in a system of cities. Journal of Public Economics. 57:1995;393-416.
8. Brueckner J. K. Modeling urban growth controls. Environmental and Public Economics: Essays in Honor of Wallace E. Oates. 1998;Edward Elgar Publishers, Cheltenham.
9. Brueckner J. K., Lai F.-C. Urban growth controls with resident landowners. Regional Science and Urban Economics. 26:1996;125-144.
10. J. K. Brueckner, L. Saavedra, Do local governments engage in strategic property tax competition?, University of Illinois, 1997.
11. Bucovetsky S. Asymmetric tax competition. Journal of Urban Economics. 30:1991;167-181.
12. Bucovetsky S., Wilson J. D. Tax competition with two tax instruments. Regional Science and Urban Economics. 21:1991;333-350.
13. Burbidge J. B., Myers G. M. Population mobility and tax competition. Regional Science and Urban Economics. 24:1994;441-459.
14. Case A. C., Rosen H. S., Hines J. R. Budget spillovers and fiscal policy interdependence: Evidence from the states. Journal of Public Economics. 52:1993;285-307.
15. 1992 HICOMP Report. 1992.
16. California Secretary of State, Elections Division, Statement of the Vote, General Election, Nov. 8, 1988, California, Sacramento, 1988.
17. Dubin J. A., Kiewiet D. R., Noussair C. Voting on growth control measures: Preferences and strategies. Economics and Politics. 4:1992;191-213.
18. Engle R., Navarro P., Carson R. On the theory of growth controls. Journal of Urban Economics. 32:1992;269-283.
19. Epple D., Zelenitz A. The implications of competition among jurisdictions: Does Tiebout need politics? Journal of Political Economy. 89:1981;1197-1217.
20. Glickfeld M., Levine N. Regional Growth...Local Reaction. 1992;Lincoln Institute of Land Policy, Cambridge.
21. Helsley R. W., Strange W. C. City formation with commitment. Regional Science and Urban Economics. 24:1994;373-390.
22. Helsley R. W., Strange W. C. Strategic growth controls. Regional Science and Urban Economics. 25:1995;435-460.
23. Henderson J. V. Community choice of revenue instruments. Regional Science and Urban Economics. 24:1994;159-183.
24. Henderson J. V. Will homeowners impose property taxes? Regional Science and Urban Economics. 25:1995;153-181.
25. Hochman O., Pines D., Thisse J.-F. On the optimal structure of local governments. American Economic Review. 85:1995;1224-1240.
26. Hoyt W. H. Competitive jurisdictions, congestion, and the Henry George theorem: When should property be taxed instead of land? Regional Science and Urban Economics. 21:1991;351-370.
27. Hoyt W. H. Property taxation, Nash equilibrium, and market power. Journal of Urban Economics. 30:1991;123-131.
28. Hoyt W. H. Tax competition, Nash equilibria, and residential mobility. Journal of Urban Economics. 34:1993;358-379.
29. Kolstad C. D., Wolak F. A. Competition in interregional taxation: The case of Western coal. Journal of Political Economy. 91:1983;443-460.
30. Lenon M., Chattopadhyay S. K., Heffley D. R. Zoning and fiscal interdependencies. Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics. 12:1996;221-232.
31. Mintz J., Tulkens H. Commodity tax competition between member states of a federation: Equilibrium and efficiency. Journal of Public Economics. 29:1986;133-172.
32. Myers G. M. Optimality, free mobility and the regional authority in a federation. Journal of Public Economics. 43:1990;107-121.
33. Myers G. M., Papageorgiou Y. Y. Fiscal inequivalence, incentive equivalence and Pareto efficiency in a decentralized urban context. Journal of Urban Economics. 33:1993;29-47.
34. Oates W. E., Schwab R. Economic competition among jurisdictions: Efficiency enhancing or distortion reducing? Journal of Public Economics. 35:1988;333-354.
35. Scotchmer S. Profit-maximizing clubs. Journal of Public Economics. 27:1985;25-45.
36. Scotchmer S. Local public goods in an equilibrium: How pecuniary externalities matter. Regional Science and Urban Economics. 16:1986;463-481.
37. Shroder M. Games the states don't play: Welfare benefits and the theory of fiscal federalism. Review of Economics and Statistics. 77:1996;183-191.
38. Slater C. M., Hall E. Places, Towns, and Townships. 1993;Bernan Press, Lanham.
39. Wildasin D. E. Nash equilibria in models of fiscal competition. Journal of Public Economics. 25:1988;193-212.
40. Wildasin D. E. Some rudimentary 'duopolity' theory. Regional Science and Urban Economics. 21:1991;393-421.
41. Wilson J. D. A theory of intergovernmental tax competition. Journal of Urban Economics. 19:1986;296-315.
42. Wilson J. D. Tax competition with interregional differences in factor endowments. Regional Science and Urban Economics. 21:1991;423-451.
43. Wilson J. D. Mobile labor, multiple tax instruments, and tax competition. Journal of Urban Economics. 38:1995;333-356.
44. Zodrow G. R., Mieszkowski P. Pigou, Tiebout, property taxation, and the undeprovision of public goods. Journal of Urban Economics. 19:1986;356-370.