State growth management programs and central-city revitalization

Journal of the American Planning Association

Volumn 69, Issue 4, 2003, Pages 381-396

  Dawkins, Casey J ^a   Nelson, Arthur C ^b  

^a VIRGINIA POLYTECHNIC INSTITUTE AND STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b Urban Affairs and Planning program   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DEVELOPMENT CONTROL; INNER CITY AREA; RENEWAL POLICY; URBAN RENEWAL;

EID: 0346273971     PISSN: 01944363     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/01944360308976326     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Baltagi, B., 1995. Econometric analysis of panel data, West Sussex, UK:John Wiley & Sons.
2. Beck, N., and Katz, J. N., 1995. What to do (and not to do) with time series cross-section data. American Political Science Review, 89:634–647.
3. Bollens, S. A., 1992. State growth management:Intergovernmental frameworks and policy objectives. Journal of the American Planning Association, 58:454–466.
4. Box, G., and Cox, D., 1964. An analysis of transformations. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B,:211–264.
5. Burby, R. J., Berke, P., Dalton, L. C., DeGrove, J. M., French, S. P., Kaiser, E. J., May, P. J., and Roenigk, D., 1993. Is state-mandated planning effective?. Land Use Law and Zoning Digest, 45 (10):3–9.
6. Burby, R. J., May, P. J., Berke, P. R., Dalton, L. C., French, S. P., and Kaiser, E. J., 1997. Making governments plan:State experiments in managing land use, Baltimore:Johns Hopkins University Press.
7. Burby, R. J., May, P. J., Malizia, E. E., and Levine, J., 2000. Building code enforcement burdens and central city decline. Journal of the American Planning Association, 66:143–161.
8. Buse, A., 1973. Goodness of fit in generalized least squares estimation. American Statistician, 27:106–108.
9. Carruthers, J. I., 2002. The impact of state growth management programmes:A comparative analysis. Urban Studies, 39:1959–1982.
10. Chow, G., 1960. Tests of equality between sets of coefficients in two linear regressions. Econometrica, 28:591–605.
11. DeGrove, J. M., and Miness, D. A., 1992. Planning and growth management in the states:The new frontier for land policy, Cambridge, MA:Lincoln Institute of Land Policy.
12. Deyle, R. E., and Smith, R. A., 1998. Local government compliance with state planning mandates:The effects of state implementation in Florida. Journal of the American Planning Association, 64:457–469.
13. Downs, A., 1999. Some realities about sprawl and urban decline. Housing Policy Debate, 10:955–974.
14. Fischel, W., 1989. Do growth controls matter? A review of empirical evidence on the effectiveness and efficiency of local government land use regulation, Cambridge, MA:Lincoln Institute of Land Policy.
15. Gale, D. E., 1992. Eight state-sponsored growth management programs. Journal of the American Planning Association, 58:425–439.
16. Garreau, J., 1991. Edge city:Life on the new frontier, New York:Doubleday.
17. Goggin, M. L., Bowman, A. O. M., Lester, J. P., and O'Toole, L. J., Jr. 1990. Implementation theory and practice:Toward a third generation, Glenview, IL:Scott, Foresman.
18. Greene, W. H., 2000. Econometric analysis, 4th ed., Upper Saddle River, NJ:Prentice Hall.
19. Hsiao, C., 1986. Analysis of panel data, Cambridge, UK:Cambridge University Press.
20. Institute for Business and Home Safety. 1998. Summary of state land use planning laws Retrieved June 1, 2001 from http://www.ibhs.org/research_library/ view.asp?id=302
21. Kain, J. F., 1993. The spatial mismatch hypothesis:Three decades later. Housing Policy Debate, 3:371–459.
22. Kasarda, J. D., Appold, S. J., Sweeney, S. H., and Sieff, E., 1997. Central city and suburban migration patterns:Is a turnaround on the horizon?. Housing Policy Debate, 8:307–358.
23. Knaap, G., and Nelson, A. C., 1992. The regulated landscape:Lessons on state land use planning from Oregon, Cambridge, MA:Lincoln Institute of Land Policy.
24. Lewis, P. G., 1996. Shaping suburbia:How political institutions organize urban development, Pittsburgh:University of Pittsburgh Press.
25. Massey, D. S., and Denton, N. A., 1993. American apartheid:Segregation and the making of the underclass, Cambridge, MA:Harvard University Press.
26. Mills, E. S., and Price, R., 1984. Metropolitan suburbanization and central city problems. Journal of Urban Economics, 15:1–17.
27. Nelson, A. C., and Moore, T., 1996. Assessing growth management policy implementation:Case study of the United States' leading growth management state. Land Use Policy, 13:241–259.
28. O'Sullivan, A., 2000. Urban economics, 4th ed., Boston:Mc-Graw-Hill/Irwin.
29. Porter, D. R., 1993. State growth management:The intergovernmental experiment. Pace Law Review, 13:481–503.
30. Prais, S., and Winsten, C., 1954. Trend estimation and serial correlation, Chicago:Cowles Commission. Discussion Paper 383
31. Pressman, J. L., and Wildavsky, A., 1984. Implementation, 3rd ed., Berkeley:University of California Press.
32. Rusk, D., 1993. Cities without suburbs, Washington, DC:Wood-row Wilson Center Press.
33. Shilling, J. D., Sirmans, C. F., and Guidry, K. A., 1991. The impact of state land-use controls on residential land values. Journal of Regional Science, 31:83–92.
34. Spain, D., 1989. Why higher income households move to central cities. Journal of Urban Affairs, 11:283–299.
35. Stimson, J. A., 1985. Regression in space and time:A statistical essay. American Journal of Political Science, 29:914–947.
36. U.S. Bureau of the Census. 1994. Geographic areas reference manual, Washington, DC:Department of Commerce.
37. Weitz, J., 1999a. From quiet revolution to smart growth:State growth management programs, 1960 to 1999. Journal of Planning Literature, 14:268–338.
38. Weitz, J., 1999b. Sprawl busting:State programs to guide growth, Chicago:APA Planners Press.