Realized correlated responses to artificial selection on pre-adult life-history traits in a butterfly

Heredity

Volumn 98, Issue 3, 2007, Pages 157-164

  Fischer, K ^a   Zwaan, B J ^b   Brakefield, P M ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BAYREUTH   (Germany)

^b LEIDEN UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Bicyclus anynana; Body size; Correlated response; Developmental time; Egg size; Trade off

Indexed keywords

BODY SIZE; BUTTERFLY; CORRELATION; EGG SIZE; EXPERIMENTAL STUDY; LIFE HISTORY TRAIT; PHENOTYPE; RESOURCE ALLOCATION; SELECTION; TRADE-OFF;

ANIMAL; ARTICLE; BODY SIZE; CELL SIZE; CYTOLOGY; FEMALE; GENETIC SELECTION; GENETICS; GROWTH, DEVELOPMENT AND AGING; INSECT; LEPIDOPTERA; MALE; OOCYTE;

ANIMALS; BODY SIZE; CELL SIZE; FEMALE; LEPIDOPTERA; MALE; OVUM; PUPA; SELECTION (GENETICS);

BICYCLUS ANYNANA;

EID: 33847256424     PISSN: 0018067X     EISSN: 13652540     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/sj.hdy.6800919     Document Type: Article

References (57)

1. Azevedo RBR, French V, Partridge L (1997). Life-history consequences of egg size in Drosophila melanogaster. Am Nat 150: 250-282.
2. Blanckenhorn WU (2000). The evolution of body size: what keeps organisms small? Quart Rev Biol 75: 385-407.
3. Blows MW, Hoffmann AA (2005). A reassessment of genetic limits to evolutionary change. Ecology 86: 1371-1384.
4. Brakefield PM (1997). Phenotypic plasticity and fluctuating asymmetry as responses to environmental stress in the butterfly Bicyclus anynana. In: Bijlsma RR, Loeschke V (eds). Environmental Stress: Adaptation and Evolution. Birkhäuser: Basel, pp 65-78.
5. Brakefield PM (2006). Evo-devo and constraints on selection. Trends Ecol Evol 21: 362-368.
6. Brakefield PM, El Filali E, van der Laan R, Breuker CJ, Saccheri IJ, Zwaan BJ (2001). Effective population size, reproductive success and sperm competition in the butterfly, Bicyclus anynana, in captivity. J Evol Biol 14: 148-156.
7. Brakefield PM, Kesbeke F (1997). Genotype-environment interactions for insect growth in constant and fluctuating temperature regimes. Proc R Soc Lond B 264: 717-723.
8. Brakefield PM, Mazzotta V (1995). Matching field and laboratory environments - effects of neglecting daily temperature-variation on insect reaction norms. J Evol Biol 8: 559-573.
9. Cheverud JM (1988). A comparison of genetic and phenotypic correlations. Evolution 42: 958-968.
10. Czesak ME, Fox CW (2003). Evolutionary ecology of egg size and number in a seed beetle: genetic trade-off differs between environments. Evolution 57: 1121-1132.
11. Falconer DS, Mackay TFC (1996). Introduction to Quantitative Genetics, 2nd edn. Longman Scientific: New York.
12. Fischer K, Bot ANM, Brakefield PM, Zwaan BJ (2003). Fitness consequences of temperature-mediated egg size plasticity in a butterfly. Funct Ecol 17: 803-810.
13. Fischer K, Bot ANM, Brakefield PM, Zwaan BJ (2006). Do mothers producing large offspring have to sacrifice fecundity? J Evol Biol 19: 380-391.
14. Fischer K, Fiedler K (2000). Sex-related differences in reaction norms in the butterfly Lycaena tityrus (Lepidoptera: Lycaenidae). Oikos 90: 372-380.
15. Fischer K, Fiedler K (2001). Dimorphic growth patterns and sex-specific reaction norms in the butterfly Lycaena hippothoe sumadiensis. J Evol Biol 14: 210-218.
16. Fischer K, Zwaan BJ, Brakefield PM (2002). How does egg size relate to body size in butterflies? Oecologia 131: 375-379.
17. Fox CW, Czesak ME (2000). Evolutionary ecology of progeny size in arthropods. Annu Rev Entomol 45: 341-369.
18. Frankino WA, Zwaan BJ, Stern DL, Brakefield PM (2005). Natural selection and developmental constraints in the evolution of allometries. Science 307: 718-720.
19. Gotthard K (2004). Growth strategies and optimal body size in temperate Pararginii butterflies. Integr Comp Biol 44: 471-479.
20. Gould SJ, Lewinton RC (1979). The Spandrels of San Marco and the Panglossian paradigm: a critique of the adaptationist programme. Proc R Soc Lond B 205: 581-598.
21. Gromko MH (1995). Unpredictability of correlated response to selection - pleiotropy and sampling interact. Evolution 49: 685-693.
22. Hill WG, Caballero A (1992). Artificial selection experiments. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 23: 287-310.
23. Honek A (1993). Intraspecific variation in body size and fecundity in insects: a general relationship. Oikos 66: 483-492.
24. Houle D (1991). Genetic covariance of fitness correlates - What genetic correlations are made of and why it matters. Evolution 45: 630-648.
25. Kooi RE, van Binnendijk E, Brakefield PM (2000). Effects of larval food on development time and fat content in the tropical butterfly Bicyclus annana. Proc Exper Appl Entomol 11: 55-60.
26. Larsen TB (1991). The Butterflies of Kenya. University Press: Oxford.
27. Lyytinen A, Brakefield PM, Lindström L, Mappes J (2004). Does predation maintain eyespot plasticity in Bicyclus anynana? Proc R Soc Lond B 271: 279-283.
28. Maynard-Smith J, Burian R, Kauffmann S, Alberch P, Campbell J, Goodwin B et al. (1985). Developmental constraints and evolution. Quart Rev Biol 60: 265-287.
29. Messina FJ, Fry JD (2003). Environment-dependent reversal of a life history trade-off in the seed beetle Callosobruchus maculatus. J Evol Biol 16: 501-509.
30. Nylin S (1992). Seasonal plasticity in life history traits: growth and development in Polygonia c-album (Lepidoptera: Nymphalidae). Biol J Linn Soc 47: 301-323.
31. Nylin S, Wiklund C, Wickman P-O, Garcia-Barros E (1993). Absence of trade-offs between sexual size dimorphism and early male emergence in a butterfly. Ecology 74: 1414-1427.
32. Partridge L, French V (1996). Thermal evolution of ectotherm body size: why get big in the cold? In: Johnston IA, Bennett AF (eds). Animals and Temperature: Phenotypic and Evolutionary Adaptation. University Press: Cambridge, pp 265-292.
33. Partridge L, Langelan R, Fowler K, Zwaan B, French V (1999). Correlated responses to selection on body size in Drosophila melanogaster. Genet Res 74: 43-54.
34. Pease CM, Bull JJ (1988). A critique of methods for measuring life history trade-offs. J Evol Biol 1: 293-303.
35. Phelan JP, Archer MA, Beckman KA, Chippindale AK, Nusbaum TJ, Rose MR (2003). Breakdown in correlations during laboratory evolution. I. Comparative analyses of Drosophila populations. Evolution 57: 527-535.
36. Pigliucci M, Kaplan J (2000). The fall and rise of Dr Pangloss: adaptationism and the Spandrels paper 20 years later. Trends Ecol Evol 15: 66-70.
37. Prasad NG, Joshi A (2003). What have two decades of laboratory life-history evolution studies on Drosophila melanogaster taught us? J Genetic 82: 45-76.
38. Prasad NG, Shakarad M, Anitha D, Rajamani M, Joshi A (2001). Correlated responses to selection for faster development and early reproduction in Drosophila: the evolution larval traits. Evolution 55: 1363-1372.
39. Reznick D (1985). Costs of reproduction - an evaluation of the empirical evidence. Oikos 44: 257-267.
40. Reznick D, Nunney L, Tessier A (2000). Big houses, big cars, superfleas and the costs of reproduction. Trends Ecol Evol 15: 421-425.
41. Roff DA (1997). Evolutionary Quantitative Genetics. Chapman and Hall: New York.
42. Roff DA (2002). Life History Evolution. Sinauer Associates: Sunderland, MA.
43. Rose MR, Charlesworth B (1981). Genetics of life-history in Drosophila melanogaster. 1. Sib analyses of adult females. Genetics 97: 172-186.
44. Schmidt-Nielsen K (1984). Scaling: Why is Animal Size so Important? University Press: Cambridge.
45. Sgrò CM, Hoffmann AA (2004). Genetic correlations, tradeoffs and environmental variation. Heredity 93: 241-248.
46. Stearns SC (1989). Trade-offs in life history evolution. Funct Ecol 3: 259-268.
47. Stearns SC (1992). The Evolution of Life Histories. Oxford University Press: New York.
48. Stearns SC, Koella JC (1986). The evolution of phenotypic plasticity in life-history traits: predictions of reaction norms for age and size at maturity. Evolution 40: 893-913.
49. Tucic N, Gliksman I, Seslija D, Stojkovic O, Milanovic D (1998). Laboratory evolution of life-history traits in the bean weevil (Acanthoscelides obtectus): the effects of selection on developmental time in populations with different previous history. Evolution 52: 1713-1725.
50. Van Noordwijk AJ, De Jong G (1986). Acquisition and allocation of resources: their influence on variation in life history tactics. Am Nat 128: 137-142.
51. Van't Hof AE, Zwaan BJ, Saccheri IJ, Daly D, Bot ANM, Brakefield PM (2005). Characterization of 28 microsatellite loci for the butterfly Bicyclus anynana. Mol Ecol Notes 5: 169-172.
52. Wiklund C, Nylin S, Forsberg J (1991). Sex-related variation in growth rate as a result of selection for large size and protandry in a bivoltine butterfly (Pieris napi L). Oikos 60: 241-250.
53. Windig JJ (1994). Genetic correlations and reaction norms in the wing pattern of the tropical butterfly Bicyclus anynana. Heredity 73: 459-470.
54. Yampolski LY, Scheiner SM (1996). Why larger offspring at lower temperatures? A demographic approach. Am Nat 147: 86-100.
55. Zijlstra WG, Kesbeke F, Zwaan BJ, Brakefield PM (2002). Protandry in the butterfly Bicyclus anynana. Evol Ecol Res 4: 1229-1240.
56. Zijlstra WG, Steigenga MJ, Brakefield PM, Zwaan BJ (2003). Simultaneous selection on two fitness-related traits in the butterfly Bicyclus anynana. Evolution 57: 1852-1862.
57. Zijlstra WG, Steigenga MJ, Koch PB, Zwaan BJ, Brakefield PM (2004). Butterfly selected lines explore the hormonal basis of interactions between life histories and morphology. Am Nat 163: E76-E87.