Breakdown in correlations during laboratory evolution. I. Comparative analyses of Drosophila populations

Evolution

Volumn 57, Issue 3, 2003, Pages 527-535

  Phelan, John P ^a,b   Archer, Margaret A ^a   Beckman, Kelly A ^a   Chippindale, Adam K ^a,c   Nusbaum, Theodore J ^a   Rose, Michael R ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^c QUEEN S UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

Author keywords

Antagonistic pleiotropy; Correlations; Fitness characters; Laboratory evolution; Longevity; Stress resistance selection

Indexed keywords

EVOLUTION; FECUNDITY; FITNESS; LONGEVITY; SELECTION; STRESS RESISTANCE;

ANIMALIA; DIPTERA; DROSOPHILA; DROSOPHILA MELANOGASTER; DROSOPHILIDAE; MELANOGASTER;

EID: 0037358674     PISSN: 00143820     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.0014-3820.2003.tb01544.x     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Archer, M. A., J. P. Phelan, K. A. Beckman, and M. R. Rose. 2003. Breakdown in correlations during laboratory evolution. II. Selection on stress resistance in Drosophila populations. Evolution 57:536-543.
2. Ariyo, O. J., and M. A. Ayo-Vaughn. 2000. Analysis of genotype x environment interaction of okra (Abelmoschus esculentus (L) Moench). J. Genet. Breed. 54:35-40.
3. Bohren, B. B., W. G. Hill, and A. Robertson. 1966. Some observations on asymmetrical correlated responses to selection. Genet. Res. 7:44-57.
4. Bulmer, M. G. 1985. The mathematical theory of quantitative genetics. Clarendon Press, Oxford, U.K.
5. Burris, M. J., and A. E. Bell. 1965. Responses to combined selection for the genetically correlated traits of larval weight and pupal weight in Tribolium castaneum. Genetics 52:431-432.
6. Chippindale, A. K., A. M. Leroi, S. B. Kim, and M. R. Rose. 1993. Phenotypic plasticity and selection in Drosophila life history evolution. I. Nutrition and the cost of reproduction. J. Evol. Biol. 6:171-193.
7. Chippindale, A. K., J. A. Alipaz, H. Chen, and M. R. Rose. 1997. Experimental evolution of accelerated development in Drosophila. 1. Larval development speed and survival. Evolution 51:1536-1551.
8. Dempster, E. R., I. M. Lerner, and D. C. Lowery. 1952. Continuous selection for egg production in poultry. Genetics 37:693-708.
9. Djawdan, M., A. K. Chippindale, M. R. Rose, and T. J. Bradley. 1998. Metabolic reserves and evolved stress resistance in Drosophila melanogaster. Physiol. Zool. 71:584-594.
10. Falconer, D. S., and T. F. C. Mackay. 1996. Introduction to quantitative genetics. 4th ed. Longman, Essex, U.K.
11. Friars, G. W., B. B. Bohren, and H. E. McKean. 1962. Time trends in estimates of genetic parameters in a population of chickens subjected to multiple objective selection. Poult. Sci. 41:1773-1784.
12. Gibbs, A., A. K. Chippindale, and M. R. Rose. 1997. Physiological mechanisms of evolved desiccation resistance in Drosophila melanogaster. J. Exp. Biol. 200:1821-1832.
13. Hutchinson, E. W., and M. R. Rose. 1991. Quantitative genetics of postponed aging in Drosophila melanogaster. I. Analysis of outbred populations. Genetics 127:719-727.
14. Ives, P. T. 1970. Further studies of the South Amherst population of Drosophila melanogaster. Evolution 38:507-518.
15. Jazwinski, S. M. 1996. Longevity, genes, and aging. Science 273:54-59.
16. Kennedy, B. K., N. R. Austriaco, J. S. Zhang, and L. Guarente. 1995. Mutation in the silencing gene SIR4 can delay aging in S. cerevisiae. Cell 80:485-496.
17. Leroi, A. M., M. R. Rose, and G. V. Lauder. 1994a. What does the comparative method reveal about adaptation? Am. Nat. 143:381-402.
18. Leroi, A. M., A. K. Chippindale, and M. R. Rose. 1994b. Long-term laboratory evolution of a genetic life-history trade-off in Drosophila melanogaster. 1. The role of genotype x environment interaction. Evolution 48:1244-1257.
19. Leroi, A. M., W. R. Chen, and M. R. Rose. 1994c. Long-term laboratory evolution of a genetic trade-off in Drosophila melanogaster. 2. Stability of genetic correlations. Evolution 48:1258-1268.
20. Lin, Y. J., L. Seroude, and S. Benzer. 1998. Extended life-span and stress resistance in the Drosophila mutant methuselah. Science 282:943-946.
21. Mousseau, T. A., and H. Dingle. 1991. Maternal effects in insect life histories. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 36:511-534.
22. Morris, C. A., R. L. Baker, S. M. Hickey, D. L. Johnson, N. G. Cullen, and J. A. Wilson. 1993. Evidence of genotype by environment interaction for reproductive and maternal traits in beef cattle. Anim. Prod. 56:69-83.
23. Rose, M. R. 1984a. Genetic covariation in Drosophila life history: untangling the data. Am. Nat. 123:565-569.
24. _. 1984b. Laboratory evolution of postponed senescence in Drosophila melanogaster. Evolution 38:1004-1010.
25. Rose, M. R., and B. Charlesworth. 1981. Genetics of life history in Drosophila melanogaster. II. Exploratory selection experiments. Genetics 97:187-196.
26. Rose, M. R., J. L. Graves, and E. W. Hutchinson. 1990. The use of selection to probe patterns of pleiotropy in fitness characters. Pp. 29-42 in F. Gilbert, ed. Insect life cycles: genetics, evolution, and coordination. Springer, London.
27. Rose, M. R., L. N. Vu, S. U. Park, and J. L. Graves. 1992. Selection on stress resistance increases longevity in Drosophila melanogaster. Exp. Gerontol. 27:241-250.
28. Rose, M. R., T. J. Nusbaum, and A. K. Chippindale. 1996. Laboratory evolution: the experimental wonderland and the Cheshire cat syndrome. Pp. 221-241 in M. R. Rose and G. V. Lauder, eds. Adaptation. Academic Press, San Diego, CA.
29. Scheiner, S. M., and C. A. Istock. 1991. Correlational selection on life history traits in the pitcher-plant mosquito. Genetica 84:123-128.
30. Sen, B. K., and A. Robertson. 1964. An experimental examination of methods for the simultaneous selection of two characters using Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics 50:199-209.
31. Service, P. M., and M. R. Rose. 1985. Genetic covariation among life-history components: the effect of novel environments. Evolution 39:943-945.
32. Service, P. M., E. W. Hutchinson, M. D. MacKinley, and M. R. Rose. 1985. Resistance to environmental stress in Drosophila melanogaster selected for postponed senescence. Physiol. Zool. 58:380-389.
33. Sheridan, A. K., and J. S. F. Barker. 1974. Two-trait selection and the genetic correlation. II. Changes in the genetic correlation during two-trait selection. Austr. J. Biol. Sci. 27:89-101.
34. Slatkin, M., and S. A. Frank 1990. The quantitative genetic consequences of pleiotropy under stabilizing and directional selection. Genetics 125:207-213.
35. Stearns, S. C., G. de Jong, and R. Newman. 1991. The effects of phenotypic plasticity on genetic correlations. Trends Ecol. Evol. 6:122-126.
36. Turelli, M. 1988. Phenotypic evolution, constant covariances and the maintenance of additive genetic variance. Evolution 42:1342-1347.
37. Via, S. 1984. The quantitative genetics of polyphagy in an insect herbivore. II. Genetic correlations in larval performance within and among host plants. Evolution 38:896-905.
38. Vieira, C., E. G. Pasyukova, Z. Zeng, B. Hackett, R. F. Lyman, and T. F. C. Mackay. 2000. Genotype-environment interaction for quantitative trait loci affecting life span in Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics 154:213-227.
39. Wilkinson, G. S., K. Fowler, and L. Partridge. 1990. Resistance of genetic correlation structure to directional selection in Drosophila melanogaster. Evolution 44:1990-2003.
40. Wright, S. 1968. Evolution and the genetics of populations. Vol. 1. Genetic and biometric foundations. Univ. of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL.