The barriers to media opening in Latin America

Political Communication

Volumn 22, Issue 1, 2005, Pages 9-25

  Hughes, Sallie ^a   Lawson, Chappell ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MIAMI   (United States)

^b MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

Author keywords

Democracy; Latin America; Media; Political communication; Press

Indexed keywords

EID: 14544275931     PISSN: 10584609     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/10584600590908410     Document Type: Review

References (79)

1. Alves, R. (2003). The evolution of Brazilian journalism toward professionalism and corporatization. Retrieved March 15, 2003, from www.utexas.edu/coc/journalism/lajou/evolution.html
2. Amaral, R., & Guimarães, C. (1994). Media monopoly in Brazil. Journal of Communication, 44(4), 26-38.
3. Asociación Mexicana de Editores de Periódicos. (2003). Declaratión de Nueva Vallarta sobre el secreto profesional del periodista [Nueva Vallarta declaration on protection of journalists' sources]. Retrieved January 20, 2004, from http://www.amed.com.mx/vallarta.php
4. Banisar, D. (2003). The global survey: Freedom of information and access to government record laws around the world. Retrieved October 10, 2003, from http://www.freedominfo.org/survey.htm
5. Bertoni, E. (2004, March 14). Personal interview with first author, Los Cabos, Mexico.
6. Cleary, J. (2003, Summer). Shaping Mexico journalists: The role of university and on-the-job training. Journalism and Mass Communication Educator, pp. 163-175.
7. Committee to Protect Journalists. (2003). Alerts and letters posted online in 2002 and 2003. Retrieved April 15, 2003, from www.cpj.org
8. Delgado, P. G., & Becker, M. (1998). The Internet and indigenous texts. Cultural Survival Quarterly, 21(4), 23-28.
9. Diamond, L. (1999). Developing democracy: Toward consolidation. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
10. Doyle, K. (2002). Mexico's new freedom of information law. Washington, DC: National Security Archive.
11. Due Process Society. (2002). Iniciativas de la sociedad civil para la transparencia en el sector judicial [Civil society initiatives for transparency in the judicial sector]. Washington, DC: Due Process of Law Foundation.
12. Escobedo, J. F. (2003). Movilización de opinion pública en México: El caso del Grupo Oaxaca y de la Ley Federal de Acceso a la Informatión Pública [Mobilization of public opinion in Mexico: The case of the Oaxaca Group and the Federal Access-to-information Law]. Felafacs: Diáloges de la Comunicación.
13. Farmelo, M. (2003). The freedom of information campaign in Argentina. Retrieved from http://www.freedominfo.org/case/argentina.htm
14. Fernández, C., & Paxman, A. (1999). El Tigre: Emilio Azcárraga y su imperio Televisa [The tiger: Emilio Azcárraga and his empire Televisa]. México, DF: Editorial Grijalbo.
15. Ferreira, L. C., Tilson, D. J., & Salwen, M. B. (2000). Sixty-five years of journalism education in Latin America. Florida Communication Journal, 27, 1-2.
16. Fox, E. (1997). Latin American broadcasting. From tango to telenovela. Luton, Beforshire, UK: University of Luton Press.
17. Fox, E., & d Waisbord, S. (Eds.) (2002). Latin politics: Global media. Austin: University of Texas Press.
18. Freedom House. (2003). Press freedom survey 2003. Retrieved Jan. 15, 2004, from http://www.freedomhouse.org/research/pressurvey.htm.
19. Fuenzalida, V. (1999). Towards reforming public television in Latin America. Retrieved April 1, 2003, from www.wacc.org.uk
20. Fuguet, A. (2001, February 25). This revolution is being televised. New York Times Magazine, pp. 34-37.
21. Fuller, J. (2003). Year-end message: Inter-American Press Association President Jack Fuller. Retrieved January 15, 2004, from http://www.sipiapa.com/ pressreleases/chronologicaldetail.cfm?PressReleaseID=1062
22. Galperin, H. (2000). Regulatory reform in the broadcasting industries of Brazil and Argentina in the 1990s. Journal of Communication, 50, 176-191.
23. Galperin, H. (2002). Transforming television in Argentina. In E. Fox & S. Waisbord (Eds.), Latin politics: Global media (pp. 22-37). Austin: University of Texas Press.
24. Gargurevich Regal, J. (1999). Perú: Cultural chica y comunicación masiva [Peru: Low culture and mass communication]. Retrieved March 15, 2003, from www.saladeprensa.org/art70.htm
25. Gill, J., & Hughes, S. (in press). Bureaucratic compliance with Mexico's new access-to-information law. Critical Studies in Media Communication.
26. Grupo de Diarios América. (2003, May). Media, economic development and political change in Latin America. Seminar sponsored by Grupo de Diarios América, Corporation Andina de Fomento, and the School of Communication, University of Miami, Coral Gables, Florida.
27. Hallin, D. C. (1996). Commercialism and professionalism in the American news media. In J. Curran & M. Gurevitch (Eds.), Mass media and society (pp. 243-261). New York: St. Martin's Press.
28. Hallin, D. C. (2000a.) La nota roja: Popular journalism and the transition to democracy in Mexico. In C. Sparks & J. Tulloch (Eds.), Tabloid tales: Global debates over media standards (pp. 267-284). New York: Rowman & Littlefield.
29. Hallin, D. C., & Papathanassopoulos, S. (2002, March). Political clientelism and the media: Southern Europe and Latin America in comparative perspective. Media, Culture and Society, pp. 185-195.
30. Hughes, S. (2001). Culture clash in the newsroom: Journalists, the media and the democratization of Mexico. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Tulane University, New Orleans, LA.
31. Hughes, S. (2003). From the inside out: How institutional entrepreneurs transformed Mexican journalism. Harvard International Journal of Press/Politics, 8, 87-117.
32. Hughes, S. and Lawson, C. (2004). Propaganda and Crony Capitalism: Partisan Bias in Mexican Television. Latin American Research Review, 39, 81-105.
33. IBOPE. (2003, May). IBOPE media information: Household ratings data transmitted by email.
34. Ibarra, C.A.M. (2002). Ejercicios ciudadanos contra la impunidad y la falta de transparencia en la administración de justicia en Guatemala. In Iniciativas de la sociedad civil para la transparencia en el sector judicial [Civil society initiatives for transparency in the judicial sector]. Washington, DC: Due Process of Law Foundation.
35. Infoamerica.org. (2003). Facultades y escuelas de periodismo y comunicación [Departments and schools of journalism and mass communication]. Retrieved March 15, 2003, from www.infoamerica.org
36. Inter-American Press Association. (2003). Press freedom in the Americas: 2003 annual report. Miami, FL.
37. Inter-American Press Association. (2002). Press freedom in the Americas: 2002 annual report. Miami, FL.
38. Jones, A. (2002). The press in transition: A comparative study of Nicaragua, South Africa, Jordan, and Russia. Hamburg, Germany: Schriften des Deutschen Übersee-Instituts.
39. Kaagan Research Associates. (2001). Encuesta a los periodistas latinoamericanos sobre el uso de internet [Survey of Latin American journalists about internet use]. Retrieved March 15, 2003, from www.pulso.org
40. Karlekar, K. D. (2003). Freedom of the press 2003: A global survey of media independence. New York: Freedom House
41. Keck, M., & Sikkink, K. (1998). Activists beyond borders: Advocacy networks in international politics. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
42. Lanao, J. E. (1999). The press faces the legal barriers in the hemisphere. In R. Trotti (Ed.), Freedom of the press and the laws: Laws that affect journalism in the Americas (pp. 32-40). Miami: Inter-American Press Association.
43. Lauría, C. (2003). Overview: the Americas. In Attacks on the press in 2002. New York: Committee to Protect Journalists.
44. Lawson, C. (2002). Building the fourth estate: Democratization and the rise of the free press in Mexico. Berkeley: University of California Press.
45. Lawson, C., & Hughes, S. (in press). Latin America's post-authoritarian media. In A. Milton & R. May (Eds.), (Un)civil societies: Human rights and democratic transitions in Eastern Europe and Latin America. Lanham, MD: Lexington Books.
46. Lawson, C., & McCann, J. A. (in press). Television news, Mexico's 2000 elections, and media effects in emerging democracies. British Journal of Political Science.
47. Lopes, R. (2003, February 26). Regulamenta o inciso XXXIII do art. 5O, da Constitução Federal, dispondo sobre presação de informaçoes pelos órgãos de Administração Publica [Regulation of the 33rd Clause of the Fifth Article of the Federal Constitution Regarding Access to Information in the Agencies of Public Administration]. Retrieved Oct. 15, 2003, from http://www.camara.gov.br/sileg/ Prop_Detalhe.asp?id=105237
48. Mendes, R. F. (1999). A profesionalização do jornalismo no Brasil [The professionalization of Brazilian journalism]. Retrieved March 15, 2003, from www.saladeprensa.org.
49. Molina Morillo, R. (2002). A declared war on aggression towards freedom. In Press freedom in the Americas: 2002 annual report. Miami, FL: IAPA.
50. Montalvo, M. (2003, May). Relato sobre seminario "Manejo de la information en America Latina" [Report on the seminar "The Use of Information in Latin America]. Paper presented at the seminar Media, Economic Development and Political Change in Latin America, Coral Gables, Florida.
51. Organization of American States. (2001). Report of the special rapporteur for freedom of expression, 2000. Retrieved January 15, 2004, from http://www.cidh.oas.org/Relatoria/English/Reports.htm
52. Organization of American States. (2003). Report of the special rapporteur for freedom of expression, 2002. Retrieved January 15, 2004, from http://www.cidh.oas.org/Relatoria/English/Reports.htm
53. Otero, S. (2003). Respetarán secrecía de fuentes periodísticas [They will respect journalists' sources]. Retrieved January 15, 2004, from www.eluniversal.com.mx
54. Porto, M.P. (2001). Media framing and citizen competence: Television and audiences' interpretations of politics in Brazil. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of California at San Diego.
55. Risse, T., Rosse, S., & Sikkink, K. (1999). The power of human rights: International norms and domestic change. New York: Cambridge University Press.
56. Rockwell, R., & Janus, N. (2002). The triumph of the media elite in postwar Central America. In E. Fox and S. Waisbord (Eds.), Latin politics: Global media (pp. 107-122). Austin: University of Texas Press.
57. Rockwell, R., and Janus, N. (2003). Media power in Central America. Champaign: University of Illinois Press.
58. Roncagliolo, R. (1999, April). Latin America's endangered frequencies. Unesco Courier, pp. 43-45.
59. Saba, R. P. (2003, March/ El derecho de la persona acceder a la información en poder del gobierno [The right of an individual to access information under the government's control]. Paper presented for the conference of the Latin American Studies Association, Dallas, TX.
60. Sánchez Carreño, S. (2003). Iniciativa con proyecto de decreto por el cual se adicionan el articulo 243 bis, del código federal de procedimientos penales y la fractión XXIX, al artículo 225, del código penal federal, relativo al derecho a la reserva de informatión y secreto profesional. Retrieved January 15, 2004, from http://www.senado.gob.mx/gaceta.php?lks/gaceta.php?andlg=59andlk=25/6_in. iciativas/sadot_art_243_bis.htm
61. Shapiro, I. (Ed.). (2002). Guía ciudadano para el trabajo presupuestario. Washington, DC: International Budget Project.
62. Sinclair, J. (1999). Latin American television: A global view. New York: Oxford University Press.
63. Sinclair, J. (2004). Globalization of Latin American media. NACLA Report on the Americas, 34 (4), 15-19.
64. Skidmore, T. E. (1993). Television, politics, and the transition to democracy in Latin America. Washington, DC: Wilson Center and Johns Hopkins University.
65. Straubhaar, J., Olsen, O., & Nunes, M. C. (1993). The Brazilian case: Influencing the voter. In T. Skidmore (Ed.), Television, politics and the transition to democracy in Latin America (pp. 118-136). Washington, D: Wilson Center and Johns Hopkins University.
66. Sussman, L. R., & Karlekar, K. D. (2003). The Annual Survey of Press Freedom 2002. New York: Freedom House.
67. Tilson, D., & Rockwell, R. (2003). Latin America. In J. Merrill & A. de Beer (Eds.), Global journalism. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
68. United Nations. (2002). United Nations statistical yearbook (46th Issue). New York: United Nations Publication.
69. United Nations Statistics Division. (2003). Millennium indicators. Retrieved May 15, 2003, from http://unstats.un.org
70. Villanueva, E. (2002). Derecho comparado de la información (2nd ed.). Mexico, DF: Universidad Iberoamericana/Fundación Konrad Adenauer.
71. Villanueva, E. (2004, January). Electronic communication with first author. Mexico City/Miami.
72. Waisbord, S. (1998a). Latin America. In A. Smith & R. Paterson (Eds.), Television: An international history (pp. 254-263). New York: Oxford University Press.
73. Waisbord, S. (2000a.) Watchdog journalism in South America: News, accountability and democracy. New York: Columbia University Press.
74. Waisbord, S. (2000b.) Media in South America: Between the rock of the state and the hard place of the market. In J. Curran & M. J. Park (Eds.), De-Westernizing media studies (pp. 50-62), New York: Routledge.
75. Waisbord, S. (2002, January). The challenges of investigative journalism. University of Miami Law Review, pp. 377-395.
76. Walden, R. (2002). Insult laws. In The right to tell: The role of the mass media in economic development (pp. 207-224). Washington, DC: World Bank Institute.
77. Weissert, W. (2002, June 5). Miami-based businessman controls big chunk of Latin American airwaves, looks to extend reach. Associated Press.
78. Wikipedia. (2003). Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia. Available at http://www.wikipedia.org/wiki/Herfindahl_index
79. World Bank. (2002). 2002 World development indicators. Retrieved March 15, 2003, from www. worldbank.org