Offsets and prioritizing the selection of new elements in search displays: More evidence for attentional capture in the preview effect

Visual Cognition

Volumn 15, Issue 2, 2007, Pages 133-148

  Pratt, Jay ^a   Theeuwes, Jan ^b   Donk, Mieke ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

^b VU UNIVERSITY AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ANALYTICAL ERROR; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; LUMINANCE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RESPONSE TIME; SELECTIVE ATTENTION; VISUAL DISCRIMINATION; VISUAL STIMULATION;

EID: 33847182428     PISSN: 13506285     EISSN: 14640716     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/13506280601029341     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Boot, W. R., Kramer, A. F. and Peterson, M. S. (2005) Oculomotor consequences of abrupt onsets and offsets: Onsets dominate oculmotor capture. Perception and Psychophysics, 67, pp. 910-928.
2. Braithwaite, J. J., Hulleman, J., Watson, D. G. and Humphreys, G. W. (2006) Is it impossible to inhibit isoluminant items, or does it simply take longer? Evidence from preview search. Perception and Psychophysics, 68, pp. 290-300.
3. Braithwaite, J. J. and Humphreys, G. W. (2003) Inhibition and anticipation in visual search: Evidence from effects of color foreknowledge on preview effect. Perception and Psychophysics, 65, pp. 213-237.
4. Braithwaite, J. J., Humphreys, G. W., Watson, D. G. and Hulleman, J. (2005) Revisiting preview search at isoluminance: New onsets are not necessary for the preview advantage. Perception and Psychophysics, 67, pp. 1214-1228.
5. Brockmole, J. R. and Henderson, J. M. (2005) Object appearance, disappearance, and attention prioritization in real-world scenes. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 12, pp. 1061-1067.
6. Donk, M. and Theeuwes, J. (2001) Visual marking beside the mark: Prioritizing selection by abrupt onsets. Perception and Psychophysics, 62, pp. 891-900.
7. Donk, M. and Theeuwes, J. (2003) Prioritizing selection of new elements: Bottom-up versus top-down control. Perception and Psychophysics, 65, pp. 1221-1242.
8. Donk, M. and Verburg, R. C. (2004) Prioritizing new elements with a brief preview period: Evidence against visual marking. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 11, pp. 282-288.
9. Egeth, H. E., Virzi, R. A. and Garbart, H. (1984) Searching for conjunctively defined targets. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 10, pp. 32-39.
10. Humphreys, G. W., Jung-Stalmann, B. and Olivers, C. N. L. (2004) An analysis of the time-course of attention in preview search. Perception and Psychophysics, 66, pp. 713-730.
11. Jiang, Y., Chun, M. M. and Marks, L. (2002) Visual marking: Selective attention to asynchronous temporal groups. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 28, pp. 717-730.
12. Kahneman, D., Treisman, A. and Burkell, J. (1983) The cost of visual filtering. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 9, pp. 510-522.
13. Kaptein, N. A., Theeuwes, J. and van der Heijden, A. H. C. (1995) Search for a conjunctively defined target can be selectively limited to a color-defined subset of elements. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 21, pp. 1053-1069.
14. Kunar, M. A., Humphreys, G. W. and Smith, K. J. (2003) History matters: The preview benefit in search is not onset capture. Psychological Science, 14, pp. 181-185.
15. Peterson, M. S., Belopolsky, A. V. and Kramer, A. F. (2003) Contingent visual marking by transients. Perception and Psychophysics, 65, pp. 695-710.
16. Pratt, J. and Hirshhorn, M. (2003) Examining the time course of facilitation and inhibition with simultaneous onset and offset cues. Psychological Research/Psychologische Forschung, 67, pp. 261-265.
17. Pratt, J. and McAuliffe, J. (2001) The effects of onsets and offsets on visual attention. Psychological Research/Psychologische Forschung, 65, pp. 185-191.
18. Pratt, J. and Trottier, L. (2005) Pro-saccades and anti-saccades to onset and offset targets. Vision Research, 45, pp. 765-774.
19. Theeuwes, J. (1991) Exogenous and endogenous control of attention: The effect of visual onsets and offsets. Perception and Psychophysics, 49, pp. 83-90.
20. Theeuwes, J., Kramer, A. F. and Atchley, P. (1998) Visual marking of old objects. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 5, pp. 130-134.
21. Watson, D. G. and Humphreys, G. W. (1997) Vision marking: Prioritizing selection for new objects by top-down attention inhibition of old objects. Psychological Review, 104, pp. 90-122.
22. Watson, D. G. and Humphreys, G. W. (2000) Vision marking: Evidence for inhibition using a probe-dot detection paradigm. Perception and Psychophysics, 62, pp. 471-481.
23. Yantis, S. and Hillstrom, A. P. (1994) Stimulus-driven attentional capture: Evidence from equiluminant visual objects. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 20, pp. 95-107.
24. Yantis, S. and Jonides, J. (1984) Abrupt visual onsets and selective attention: Evidence from visual search. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 10, pp. 601-621.