Potentially accommodating 1CU intraocular lens: 1-Year results in 553 eyes and literature review

Journal of Refractive Surgery

Volumn 23, Issue 2, 2007, Pages 159-171

  Uthoff, Detlef ^a   Gulati, Amit ^a   Hepper, Daniel ^a   Holland, Detlef ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL SCHLESWIG HOLSTEIN   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACCOMMODATION; AGED; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ASSESSMENT; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONTROLLED STUDY; EYE REFRACTION; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; LENS IMPLANT; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MEASUREMENT; MONOFOCAL INTRAOCULAR LENS; OPTIC SHIFT INTRAOCULAR LENS; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; SAFETY; STATISTICAL SIGNIFICANCE; VISUAL ACUITY;

EID: 33847165400     PISSN: 1081597X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3928/1081-597x-20070201-08     Document Type: Article

References (51)

1. Mastropasqua L, Toto L, Nubile M, Falconio G, Ballone E. Clinical study of the 1CU accommodating intraocular lens. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2003;29:1307-1312.
2. Claoue C. Functional vision after cataract removal with multifocal and accommodating intraocular lens implantation: prospective comparative evaluation of Array multifocal and 1CU accommodating lenses. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2004;30:2088-2091.
3. Dogru M, Honda R, Omoto M, Toda I, Fujishima H, Arai H, Matsuyama M, Nishijima S, Hida Y, Yagi Y, Tsubota K. Early visual results with the 1CU accommodating intraocular lens. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2005;31:895-902.
4. Heatley CJ, Spalton DJ, Hancox J, Kumar A, Marshall J. Fellow eye comparison between the 1CU accommodative intraocular lens and the Acrysof MA30 monofocal intraocular lens. Am J Ophthalmol. 2005;140:207-213.
5. Kuchle M, Seitz B, Langenbucher A, Martus P, Nguyen NX. Stability of refraction, accommodation, and lens position after implantation of the 1CU accommodating posterior chamber intraocular lens. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2003;29:2324-2329.
6. Hamilton DR, Davidorf JM, Maloney RK. Anterior ciliary sclerotomy for treatment of presbyopia: a prospective controlled study. Ophthalmology. 2002;109:1970-1976.
7. Malecaze FJ, Gazagne CS, Tarroux MC, Gorrand JM. Scleral expansion bands for presbyopia. Ophthalmology. 2001;108:2165-2171.
8. Jain S, Ou R, Azar DT. Monovision outcomes in presbyopic individuals after refractive surgery. Ophthalmology. 2001;108:1430-1433.
9. Cumming JS, Slade SG, Chayet A. Clinical evaluation of the model AT-45 silicone accommodating intraocular lens: results of feasibility and the initial phase of a Food and Drug Administration clinical trial. Ophthalmology. 2001;108:2005-2009.
10. Jacobi PC, Dietlein TS, Luke C, Jacobi FK. Multifocal intraocular lens implantation in prepresbyopic patients with unilateral cataract. Ophthalmology. 2002;109:680-686.
11. Baikoff G, Matach G, Fontaine A, Ferraz C, Spera C. Correction of presbyopia with refractive multifocal phakic intraocular lenses. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2004;30:1454-1460.
12. Kuchle M, Seitz B, Langenbucher A, Gusek-Schneider GC, Martus P, Nguyen NX. Comparison of 6-month results of implantation of the 1CU accommodative intraocular lens with conventional intraocular lenses. Ophthalmology. 2004;111:318-324.
13. Auffarth GU. Accommodative intraocular lenses. Can synthetic lenses accommodate [German]? Ophthalmologe. 2002;99:809-810.
14. Dick HB, Kaiser S. Dynamic aberrometry during accommodation of phakic eyes and eyes with potentially accommodative intraocular lenses [German]. Ophthalmologe. 2002;99:825-834.
15. Bellucci R. Multifocal intraocular lenses. Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 2005;16:33-37.
16. Dick HB. Accommodative intraocular lenses: current status. Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 2005;16:8-26.
17. Kuchle M, Langenbucher A, Gusek-Schneider GC, Seitz B, Hanna KD. First results of implantation of a new, potentially accommodative posterior chamber intraocular lens. Klin Monatsbl Augenheilkd. 2001;218:603-608.
18. Haigis W, Lege B, Miller N, Schneider B. Comparison of immersion ultrasound biometry and partial coherence interferometry for intraocular lens calculation according to Haigis. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2000;238:765-773.
19. von Helmholtz H. Über die akkommodation des auges. Graefes Arch Klin Exp Ophthalmol. 1855;1:1-74.
20. Rohen JW, Rentsch FJ. Functional morphology of the accommodation apparatus, including a new theory on the mechanical tissue changes during accommodation. Medizinische Welt. 1969;18:1052-1054.
21. Tamm E, Lutjen-Drecoll E, Jungkunz W, Rohen JW. Posterior attachment of ciliary muscle in young, accommodating old, presbyopic monkeys. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1991;32:1678-1692.
22. Cumming JS, Kammann J. Experience with an accommodating IOL. J Cataract Refract Surg. 1996;22:1001.
23. Wetzel PA, Geri GA, Pierce BJ. An integrated system for measuring static and dynamic accommodation with a Canon Autoref R-1 refractometer. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 1996;16:520-527.
24. Glasser A, Kaufman PL. The mechanism of accommodation in primates. Ophthalmology. 1999;106:863-872.
25. Ludwig K, Wegscheider E, Hoops JP, Kampik A. In vivo imaging of the human zonular apparatus with high-resolution ultrasound biomicroscopy. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 1999;237:361-371.
26. Hara T, Yasuda A, Yamada Y. Accommodative intraocular lens with spring action, part 1: design and placement in an excised animal eye. Ophthalmic Surg. 1990;21:128-133.
27. Hardman Lea SJ, Rubinstein MP, Snead MP, Haworth SM. Pseudophakic accommodation? A study of the stability of capsular bag supported, one piece, rigid tripod, or soft flexible implants. Br J Ophthalmol. 1990;74:22-25.
28. Legeais JM, Werner L, Werner L, Abenhaim A, Renard G. Pseudoaccommodation: BioComFold versus a foldable silicone intraocular lens. J Cataract Refract Surg. 1999;25:262-267.
29. Kuchle M, Nguyen NX, Langenbucher A, Gusek-Schneider GC, Seitz B, Hanna KD. Implantation of a new accommodative posterior chamber intraocular lens. J Refract Surg. 2002;18:208-216.
30. Sarfarazi FM. Optical and mechanical design for human implantation of the Sarfarazi Elliptical Accommodation intraocular lens [abstract #738]. Proceedings of the American Society of Cataract and Refractive Surgery; April 12-16, 2003; San Francisco, Calif.
31. Nijkamp MD, Dolders MG, de Brabander J, van den Borne B, Hendrikse F, Nuijts RM. Effectiveness of multifocal intraocular lenses to correct presbyopia after cataract surgery: a randomized controlled trial. Ophthalmology. 2004;111:1832-1839.
32. Leyland M, Zinicola E. Multifocal versus monofocal intraocular lenses in cataract surgery: a systematic review. Ophthalmology. 2003;110:1789-1798.
33. Schmitz S, Dick HB, Krummenauer F, Schwenn O, Krist R. Contrast sensitivity and glare disability by halogen light after monofocal and multifocal lens implantation. Br J Ophthalmol. 2000;84:1109-1112.
34. Kamlesh, Dadeya S, Kaushik S. Contrast sensitivity and depth of focus with aspheric multifocal versus conventional monofocal intraocular lens. Can J Ophthalmol. 2001;36:197-201.
35. Pieh S, Lackner B, Hanselmayer G, Zuhrer R, Sticker M, Weghaupt H, Fercher A, Skorpik C. Halo size under distance and near conditions in refractive multifocal intraocular lenses. Br J Ophthalmol. 2001;85:816-821.
36. Kohnen T. Visual acuity results of the Acrysof Restor apodized diffractive pseudoaccommodative IOL. Presented at the XXII Congress of ESCRS; September 18-22, 2004; Paris, France.
37. Moshegov C. Early results of implantation of the Alcon Acrysof Restor pseudoaccommodative intraocular lens (IOL). Presented at the XXII Congress of ESCRS; September 18-22, 2004; Paris, France.
38. Sen HN, Sarikkola AU, Uusitalo RJ, Laatikainen L. Quality of vision after AMO Array multifocal intraocular lens implantation. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2004;30:2483-2493.
39. Sauder G, Degenring RF, Kamppeter B, Hugger P. Potential of the 1CU accommodative intraocular lens. Br J Ophthalmol. 2005;89:1289-1292.
40. Langenbucher A, Huber S, Nguyen NX, Seitz B, Gusek-Schneider GC, Kuchle M. Measurement of accommodation after implantation of an accommodating posterior chamber intraocular lens. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2003;29:677-685.
41. Kamppeter BA, Sauder G, Jonas JB. Contrast and glare sensitivity after implantation of AcrySof and Human Optics ICU intraocular lenses. Eur J Ophthalmol. 2005;15:458-461.
42. Apple DJ, Solomon KD, Tetz MR, Assia EI, Holland EY, Legier UF, Tsai JC, Castaneda VE, Hoggatt JP, Kostick AM. Posterior capsule opacification. Surv Ophthalmol. 1992;37:73-116.
43. Auffarth GU, Golescu A, Becker KA, Volcker HE. Quantification of posterior capsule opacification with round and sharp edge intraocular lenses. Ophthalmology. 2003;110:772-780.
44. Auffarth GU, Rabsilber TM, Reuland AJ. New methods for the prevention of posterior capsule opacification [German]. Ophthalmologe. 2005;102:579-586.
45. Nguyen NX, Seitz B, Reese S, Langenbucher A, Kuchle M. Accommodation after Nd: YAG capsulotomy in patients with accommodative posterior chamber lens ICU. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2005;243:120-126.
46. Kuchle M, Amberg A, Martus P, Nguyen NX, Naumann GO. Pseudoexfoliation syndrome and secondary cataract. Br J Ophthalmol. 1997;81:862-866.
47. Sacu S, Findl O, Linnola RJ. Optical coherence tomography assessment of capsule closure after cataract surgery. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2005;31:330-336.
48. Findl O. Biometry and intraocular lens power calculation. Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 2005;16:61-64.
49. Findl O, Kriechbaum K, Menapace R, Koeppl C, Sacu S, Wirtitsch M, Buehl W, Drexler W. Laserinterferometric assessment of pilocarpine-induced movement of an accommodating intraocular lens: a randomized trial. Ophthalmology. 2004;111:1515-1521.
50. Kriechbaum K, Findl O, Koeppl C, Menapace R, Drexler W. Stimulus-driven versus pilocarpine-induced biometric changes in pseudophakic eyes. Ophthalmology. 2005;112:453-459.
51. Stachs O, Schneider H, Stave J, Guthoff R. Potentially accommodating intraocular lenses-an in vitro and in vivo study using three-dimensional high-frequency ultrasound. J Refract Surg. 2005;21:37-45.