Comparison of generalized autocalibrating partially parallel acquisitions and modified sensitivity encoding for diffusion tensor imaging

American Journal of Neuroradiology

Volumn 28, Issue 2, 2007, Pages 293-298

  Bhagat, Y A ^a   Emery, D J ^a   Naik, S ^a   Yeo, T ^a   Beaulieu, Christian ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ALBERTA   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ANISOTROPY; APPARATUS; ARTICLE; ARTIFACT REDUCTION; CALCULATION; CALIBRATION; DIFFUSION COEFFICIENT; DIFFUSION TENSOR IMAGING; EVALUATION; GENERALIZED AUTOCALIBRATING PARTIALLY PARALLEL ACQUISITIONS; GEOMETRY; GRAY MATTER; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; IMAGE DISPLAY; IMAGE ENHANCEMENT; IMAGE PROCESSING; IMAGE QUALITY; IMAGE RECONSTRUCTION; IMAGING SYSTEM; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MATHEMATICAL ANALYSIS; MODIFIED SENSITIVITY ENCODING; NEURORADIOLOGY; NORMAL HUMAN; QUALITATIVE ANALYSIS; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; REPRODUCIBILITY; SCORING SYSTEM; SIGNAL DETECTION; SIGNAL NOISE RATIO; WHITE MATTER;

ADULT; ARTIFACTS; BRAIN; BRAIN MAPPING; CALIBRATION; DIFFUSION MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; HUMANS; IMAGE PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; MODELS, THEORETICAL; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

EID: 33847099530     PISSN: 01956108     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Bammer R, Keeling SL, Augustin M, et al. Improved diffusion-weighted single-shot echo-planar imaging (EPI) in stroke using sensitivity encoding (SENSE). Magn Reson Med 2001;46:548-54
2. Willinek WA, Gieseke J, von Falkenhausen M, et al. Sensitivity encoding for fast MR imaging of the brain in patients with stroke. Radiology 2003;228:669-75
3. Augustin M, Fazekas F, Bammer R. Fast patient workup in acute stroke using parallel imaging. Top Magn Reson Imaging 2004;15:207-19
4. Kuhl CK, Gieseke J, von Falkenhausen M, et al. Sensitivity encoding for diffusion-weighted MR imaging at 3.0 T: intraindividual comparative study. Radiology 2005;234:517-26
5. Bammer R, Schoenberg SO. Current concepts and advances in clinical parallel magnetic resonance imaging. Top Magn Reson Imaging 2004;15:129-58
6. McGibney G, Smith MR, Nichols ST, et al. Quantitative evaluation of several partial Fourier reconstruction algorithms used in MRI. Magn Reson Med 1993;30:51-59
7. Jaermann T, Crelier G, Pruessmann KP, et al. SENSE-DTI at 3 T. Magn Reson Med 2004;51:230-36
8. Jaermann T, Pruessmann KP, Valavanis A, et al. Influence of SENSE on image properties in high-resolution single-shot echo-planar DTI. Magn Reson Med 2006;55:335-42
9. Pruessmann KP, Weiger M, Scheidegger MB, et al. SENSE: sensitivity encoding for fast MRI. Magn Reson Med 1999;42:952-62
10. Bammer R, Auer M, Keeling SL, et al. Diffusion tensor imaging using single-shot SENSE-EPI. Magn Reson Med 2002;48:128-36
11. Wang J, Kluge T, Nittka M, et al. Parallel acquisition techniques with modified SENSE reconstruction mSENSE. Proceedings of the first Wurzburg workshop on parallel imaging basics and clinical applications. Wurzburg, Germany;2001:89
12. Griswold MA, Jakob PM, Heidemann RM, et al. Generalized autocalibrating partially parallel acquisitions (GRAPPA). Magn Reson Med 2002;47:1202-10
13. Blaimer M, Breuer F, Mueller M, et al. SMASH, SENSE, PILS, GRAPPA: how to choose the optimal method. Top Magn Reson Imaging 2004;15:223-36
14. Griswold MA, Kannengiesser S, Heidemann RM, et al. Field-of-view limitations in parallel imaging. Magn Reson Med 2004;52:1118-26
15. Hunold P, Maderwald S, Ladd ME, et al. Parallel acquisition techniques in cardiac cine magnetic resonance imaging using TrueFISP sequences: comparison of image quality and artifacts. J Magn Reson Imaging 2004;20:506-11
16. Ruel L, Brugieres P, Luciani A, et al. Comparison of in vitro and in vivo MRI of the spine using parallel imaging. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2004;182:749-55
17. Vogt FM, Antoch G, Hunold P, et al. Parallel acquisition techniques for accelerated volumetric interpolated breath-hold examination magnetic resonance imaging of the upper abdomen: assessment of image quality and lesion conspicuity. J Magn Reson Imaging 2005;21:376-82
18. Price RR, Axel L, Morgan T, et al. Quality assurance methods and phantoms for magnetic resonance imaging: report of AAPM nuclear magnetic resonance Task Group No. 1. Med Phys 1990;17:287-95
19. Firbank MJ, Coulthard A, Harrison RM, et al. A comparison of two methods for measuring the signal to noise ratio on MR images. Phys Med Biol 1999; 44:N261-264
20. Reeder SB, Wintersperger BJ, Dietrich O, et al. Practical approaches to the evaluation of signal-to-noise ratio performance with parallel imaging: application with cardiac imaging and a 32-channel cardiac coil. Magn Reson Med 2005;54:748-54
21. Yamada K, Kizu O, Mori S, et al. Brain fiber tracking with clinically feasible diffusion-tensor MR imaging: initial experience. Radiology 2003;227:295-301
22. Nagae-Poetscher LM, Jiang H, Wakana S, et al. High-resolution diffusion tensor imaging of the brain stem at 3 T. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2004;25:1325-30
23. Kingsley PB, Monahan WG. Contrast-to-noise ratios of diffusion anisotropy indices. Magn Reson Med 2005;53:911-18
24. Alexander AL, Hasan K, Kindlmann G, et al. A geometric analysis of diffusion tensor measurements of the human brain. Magn Reson Med 2000;44:283-91