Control by contextual stimuli in novel second-order conditional discriminations

Psychological Record

Volumn 57, Issue 1, 2007, Pages 117-143

  Pérez gonzález, Luis Antonio ^a,c   Martínez, Héctor ^b,d  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OVIEDO   (Spain)

^b UNIVERSITY OF GUADALAJARA   (Mexico)

^c Laboratory of Psychobiology   (Spain)

^d Instituto de Neurociencias   (Mexico)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 33847068401     PISSN: 00332933     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/BF03395568     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. BARON, A., & GALIZIO, M. (1983). Instructional control of human operant behavior. The Psychological Record, 33, 495-520.
2. BUSH, K. M., SIDMAN, M., & DE ROSE, T. (1989). Contextual control of emergent equivalence relations. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 51, 29-45.
3. CARPENTIER, F., SMEETS, P. M., & BARNES-HOLMES, D. (2002). Class formation of unrelated stimuli with same discriminative functions. European Journal of Behavior Analysis, 3, 7-19.
4. CARPENTIER, F., SMEETS, P. M., & BARNES-HOLMES, D. (2003). Matching unrelated stimuli with same discriminative functions: Training order effects. Behavioural Processes, 60, 215-226.
5. DYMOND, S., & BARNES, D. (1995). A transformation of self-discrimination response functions in accordance with the arbitrarily applicable relations of sameness, more than, and less than. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 64, 163-184.
6. GATCH, M. B., & OSBORNE, J. G. (1989). Transfer of contextual stimulus function via equivalence class development. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 51, 369-378.
7. HAYES, S. C., BARNES-HOLMES, D., & ROCHE, B. (2001). Relational frame theory: A post-Skinnerian account of human language and cognition. New York: Plenum Publishers.
8. HAYES, S., KOHLENBERG, B. S., & HAYES, L. J. (1991). The transfer of specific and general consequential functions through simple and conditional equivalence relations. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 56, 119-137.
9. KENNEDY, C. H., & LAITINEN, R. (1988). Second-order conditional control of symmetric and transitive stimulus relations: The influence of order effects. The Psychological Record, 38, 437-446.
10. LYNCH, D. C., & GREEN, G. (1991). Development and crossmodal transfer of contextual control of emergent stimulus relations. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 56, 139-154.
11. MARKHAM, M. R., & DOUGHER, M. J. (1993). Compound stimuli in emergent stimulus relations: Extending the scope of stimulus equivalence. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 60, 529-542.
12. MARTÍNEZ, H., & MORENO, R. (1995). El papel de la contigüidad y la contingencia en el condicionamiento: Una revisión y una propuesta metodológica [The role of contiguity and contingency in conditioning: A review and a methodological proposal]. Mexican Journal of Behavior Analysis, 21 (Special issue), 75-106.
13. MARTÍNEZ-SÁNCHEZ, H., & RIBES-IÑESTA, E. (1996). Interactions of contingencies and instructional history on conditional discrimination. The Psychological Record, 46, 301-318.
14. MCILVANE, W. J., & DUBE, W. V. (1992). Stimulus control shaping and stimulus control topographies. The Behavior Analyst, 15, 89-94.
15. MEEHAN, E. F., & FIELDS, L. (1995). Contextual control of new equivalence classes. The Psychological Record, 45, 165-182.
16. PÉREZ-GONZÁLEZ, L. A. (1991). El análisis funcional de la conducta verbal a través del condicionamiento operante: La emergencia de nuevas conductas por medio de procedimientos de discriminaciones condicionales [The functional analysis of verbal behavior through operant conditioning: The emergence of novel behaviors by conditional discrimination procedures]. Oviedo, Spain: Servicio de Publicaciones de la Universidad de Oviedo.
17. PÉREZ-GONZÁLEZ, L. A., & SERNA, R. W. (1993a). Basic stimulus control functions in the five-term contingency. Experimental Analysis of Human Behavior Bulletin, 11, 52-54.
18. PÉREZ-GONZÁLEZ, L. A., & SERNA, R. W. (1993b, September). Comparación entre dos procedimientos de aprendizaje de estímulos contextuales en discriminaciones condicionales [Comparison between two procedures to learn contextual stimuli in conditional discriminations]. Communication presented to the V Meeting of the Spanish Society of Comparative Psychology. Barcelona, Spain.
19. PÉREZ-GONZÁLEZ, L. A., & SERNA, R. W. (2003). Transfer of specific contextual functions to novel conditional discriminations. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 79, 395-408.
20. PÉREZ-GONZÁLEZ, L. A., SPRADLIN, J. E., & SAUNDERS, K. J. (2000). Learning-set outcome in second-order conditional discriminations. The Psychological Record, 50, 429-442.
21. ROCHE, B., & BARNES, D. (1996). Arbitrarily applicable relational responding and sexual categorization: A critical test of the derived difference relation. The Psychological Record, 46, 451-475.
22. ROCHE, B., & BARNES, D. (1997). A transformation of respondently conditioned stimulus function in accordance with arbitrarily applicable relations. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 67, 275-301.
23. SAUNDERS, R. R. (1996). From review to commentary on Roche and Barnes: Toward a better understanding of equivalence in the context of Relational Frame Theory. The Psychological Record, 46, 477-487.
24. SERNA, R. W. (1991). Interchangeability of stimulus terms in five-term contingencies. Experimental Analysis of Human Behavior Bulletin, 9, 2-3.
25. SERNA, R. W., & PÉREZ-GONZÁLEZ, L. A. (1994, October). Emergent five-term contingency performances. Communication presented to the Eleventh Annual Meeting of the Southeastern Association for Behavior Analysis, Savannah, Georgia, United States.
26. SERNA, R. W., & PÉREZ-GONZÁLEZ, L. A. (1997, July). Generalized contextual control of conditional discriminations and unreinforced conditional selection. Communication presented to the III European Meeting on Experimental Analysis of Behaviour. Dublin, Ireland.
27. SERNA, R. W., & PÉREZ-GONZÁLEZ, L. A. (2003). An analysis of generalized contextual control of conditional discriminations. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 79, 383-393.
28. SIDMAN, M. (1986). Functional analysis of emergent verbal classes. In T. Thompson & M. D. Zeiler (Eds.), Analysis and integration of behavioral units (pp. 213-245). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
29. SIDMAN, M. (1994). Equivalence relations and behavior: A research story. Boston: Authors Cooperative.
30. SIDMAN, M. (2000). Equivalence relations and the reinforcement contingency. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 74, 127-146.
31. TOUCHETTE, P. E. (1971). Transfer of stimulus control: Measuring the moment of transfer. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 15, 347-354.
32. WULFERT, E., & HAYES, S. C. (1988). Transfer of a conditional ordering response through conditional equivalence classes. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 50, 125-144.