Social psychological factors in tackling obesity

Obesity Reviews

Volumn 8, Issue SUPPL. 1, 2007, Pages 123-125

  Maio, G R ^a   Haddock, G G ^a   Jarman, H L ^a  

^a CARDIFF UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Ambivalence; Attitudes; Implicit; Obesity

Indexed keywords

AMBIVALENCE; ATTITUDE TO HEALTH; HEALTH BEHAVIOR; HEALTH EDUCATION; HEALTH PROGRAM; HEALTH PROMOTION; OBESITY; PUBLIC HEALTH SERVICE; REVIEW; SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY;

HEALTH BEHAVIOR; HUMANS; OBESITY;

EID: 33847017805     PISSN: 14677881     EISSN: 1467789X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-789X.2007.00330.x     Document Type: Review

References (16)

1. Bell DW, Esses VM. Ambivalence and response amplification: a motivational perspective. Pers Soc Psychol Bull 2002; 28: 1143-1152.
2. Lima MV. Self persuasion strategies to resist temptation. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Cardiff University, UK, 2005.
3. Kruglanski AW, Webster DM Motivated closing of the mind: 'seizing' and 'freezing'. Psychol Rev 1996; 103: 263-283.
4. Muraven M, Baumeister RF. Self-regulation and depletion of limited resources: does self-control resemble a muscle? Psychol Bull 2000; 126: 247-259.
5. Wood W, Quinn JM, Kashy DA. Habits in everyday life: thought, emotion, and action. J Pers Soc Psychol 2002; 83: 1281-1297.
6. Jonas K, Diehl M, Bromer P. Effects of attitudinal ambivalence on information processing and attitude-intention consistency. J Exp Soc Psychol 1997; 33: 190-210.
7. Maio GR, Bell DW, Esses VM. Ambivalence and persuasion: the processing of messages about immigrant groups. J Exp Soc Psychol 1996; 32: 513-536.
8. Maio GR, Haddock GG, Watt SE, Hewstone M. Implicit measures and applied contexts: an illustrative examination of anti-racism advertising. In: Petty RE, Fazio RH, Brinol P (eds). Attitudes: Insights from the New Wave of Implicit Measures (in press).
9. Greenwald AG, McGhee DE, Schwartz JKL Measuring individual differences in implicit cognition: the implicit association test. J Pers Soc Psychol 1998; 74: 1464-1480.
10. Schuette RA, Fazio RH. Attitude accessibility and motivation as determinants of biased processing: a test of the MODE model. Pers Soc Psychol Bull 1995; 21: 704-710.
11. Wittenbrink B, Judd C, Park B. Evidence for racial prejudice at the implicit level and its relationship with questionnaire measures. J Pers Soc Psychol 1997; 72: 262-274.
12. Roefs A, Stapert D, Isabella LAS, Wolters G, Wojciechowski F, Jansen A. Early Associations with food in anorexia nervosa patients and obese people assessed in the affective priming paradigm. Eat Behav 2005; 6: 151-163.
13. Dovidio JF, Kawakami K, Gaertner SL. Implicit and explicit prejudice and interracial interaction. J Pers Soc Psychol 2002; 82: 62-68.
14. Dovidio JF, Kawakami K, Johnson C, Johnson B, Howard A. On the nature of prejudice: automatic and controlled processes. J Exp Soc Psychol 1997; 33: 510-540.
15. Wilson TD, Lindsey S, Schooler TY. A model of dual attitudes. Psychol Rev 2000; 107: 101-126.
16. Cunningham WA, Johnson MK, Gatenby JC, Gore JC, Banaji MR. Neural components of social evaluation. J Pers Soc Psychol 2003; 85: 639-649.