Is vowel normalization independent of lexical processing?

Phonetica

Volumn 63, Issue 4, 2006, Pages 209-229

  Mitterer, Holger ^a  

^a MAX PLANCK INSTITUTE FOR PSYCHOLINGUISTICS   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; AWARENESS; HUMAN; LINGUISTICS; PHONETICS; SEMANTICS; SOUND DETECTION; SPEECH PERCEPTION;

AWARENESS; HUMANS; PHONETICS; SEMANTICS; SOUND SPECTROGRAPHY; SPEECH PERCEPTION; VOCABULARY;

EID: 33846974326     PISSN: 00318388     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1159/000097306     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. Adank, P.; Smits, R.; Hout, R. van: A comparison of vowel normalization procedures for language variation research. J. acoust. Soc. Am. 116: 3099-3107 (2004).
2. Agresti, A.: Tutorial on modeling ordered categorical response data. Psychol. Bull. 105: 290-301 (1989).
3. Bladon, A.; Henton, C.; Pickering, J.B.: Towards an auditory theory of speaker normalization. Lang. Commun. 4: 59-69 (1984).
4. Eimas, P.D.; Corbit, J.D.: Selective adaptation of linguistic feature detectors. Perception Psychophysics 4: 99-109 (1973).
5. Eisner, F.; McQueen, J.M.: The specificity of perceptual learning in speech processing. Perception Psychophysics 67: 224-238 (2005).
6. Evans, B.G.; Iverson, P.: Vowel normalization for accent: An investigation of best exemplar locations in northern and southern British English sentences. J. acoust. Soc. Am. 115: 352-361 (2004).
7. Fowler, C.A.: Sound-producing sources as objects of perception: Rate normalization and nonspeech perception. J. acoust. Soc. Am. 89: 2905-2909 (1990).
8. Fowler, C.A.: Compensation for coarticulation reflects gesture perception, not spectral contrast. Perception Psychophysics 68: 161-177 (2006).
9. Ganong, W.F.: Phonetic categorization in auditory word perception. J. exp. Psychol. hum. Perception Performance 6: 110-125 (1980).
10. Goldinger, S.: Words and voices: Episodic traces in spoken word identification and recognition memory. J. exp. Psychol. Learning Memory Cognition 22: 1166-1183 (1996).
11. Goldinger, S.: Echoes of echoes? An episodic theory of lexical access. Psychol. Rev. 105: 251-279 (1998).
12. Gow, D.W.: Assimilation and anticipation in continuous spoken word recognition. J. Memory Lang. 45: 133-159 (2001).
13. Holt, L.L.: Temporally non-adjacent non-linguistic sounds affect speech categorization. Psychol. Sci. 16: 305-312 (2005).
14. Holt, L.L.; Lotto, A.J.; Kluender, K.R.: Influence of fundamental frequency on stop-consonant voicing perception: A case of learned covariation or auditory enhancement? J. acoust. Soc. Am. 109: 764-774 (2001).
15. Johnson, K.: Speech perception without speaker normalization: An exemplar model; in Johnson, Mullennix, Talker variability in speech processing, pp. 145-165 (Academic Press, San Diego 1997).
16. Johnson, K.; Strand, E.A.; D'Imperio, M.: Auditory-visual integration of talker gender in vowel perception. J. Phonet. 27: 359-384 (1999).
17. Klatt, D.: Speech perception: A model of acoustic-phonetic analysis and lexical access. J. Phonet. 7: 279-312 (1979).
18. Klatt, D.: Software for a cascade/parallel formant synthesizer. J. acoust. Soc. Am. 67: (1980).
19. Klatt, D.: Review of selected models of speech perception; in Marslen-Wilson, Lexical representation and process, pp. 169-226 (MIT Press, Cambridge 1989).
20. Kluender, K.R.; Coady, J.A.; Kiefte, M.: Sensitivity to change in perception of speech. Speech Commun. 41: 59-69 (2001).
21. Kohler, K.J.: Investigating unscripted speech: Implications for phonetics and phonology. Phonetica 57: 85-95 (2000).
22. Ladefoged, P.: A note on 'Information conveyed by vowels'. J. acoust. Soc. Am. 85: 2223-2234 (1989).
23. Ladefoged, P.; Broadbent, D.E.: Information conveyed by vowels. J. acoust. Soc. Am. 27: 98-104 (1957).
24. Landauer, T.K.: How much do people remember? Some estimates of the quantity of learned information in longterm memory. Cognitive Sci. 10: 477-493 (1986).
25. Lindblom, B.; Studdert-Kennedy, M.: On the role of formant transitions in vowel recognition. J. acoust. Soc. Am. 43: 830-843 (1967).
26. Lotto, A.J.; Kluender, K.R.: General contrast effects in speech perception: Effect of preceding liquid on stop consonant identification. Perception Psychophysics 60: 602-619 (1998).
27. Manuel, S.Y.: Recovery of 'deleted' schwa. Perilius: Papers from the Symposium on current phonetic research paradigms for speech motor control, p. 115-118 (University of Stockholm, Stockholm 1992).
28. Massaro, D.: Perceiving talking faces: From speech perception to a behavioral principle (MIT Press, Cambridge 1998).
29. McQueen, J.M.; Cutler, A.: Spoken word access processes: An introduction. Lang. Cognitive Processes 16: 469-490 (2001).
30. Mitterer, H.: On the causes of compensation for coarticulation: Evidence for phonological mediation. Perception Psychophysics (in press).
31. Mitterer, H.; Csépe, V.; Blomert, L.: The role of perceptual integration in the perception of assimilated word forms. Q. Jl. exp. Psychol. 59: 1305-1334 (2006).
32. Nearey, T.D.: Static, dynamic, and relational properties in vowel perception. J. acoust. Soc. Am. 85: 2088-2113 (1989).
33. Norris, D.; Cutler, A.; McQueen, J.M.: Peceptual learning in speech. Cognitive Psychol. 47: 204-238 (2003).
34. Peterson, G.E.; Barney, H.: Control methods used in a study of vowels. J. acoust. Soc. Am. 24: 369-381 (1952).
35. Remez, R.E.: Neural models of speech perception: A case history; in Harnad, Categorical perception: The groundwork of cognition, pp. 199-225 (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 1987).
36. Repp, B.H.; Liberman, A.M.: Phonetic categories are flexible; in Harnad, Categorical perception: The groundwork of cognition, pp. 89-112 (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 1987).
37. Shockey, L.: Sound patterns of spoken English (Blackwell, Cambridge 2003).
38. Snodgrass, J.G.; Hirshman, E.; Fan, J.: The sensory match effect in recognition memory: Perceptual fluency or episodic trace? Memory Cognition 24: 367-383 (1996).
39. Thompson, C.L.; Hollien, H.: Some contextual effects on the perception of synthetic vowels. Lang. Speech 13: 1-13 (1970).
40. Traunmüller, H.: Conventional, biological and environmental factors in speech communication: A modulation theory. Phonetica 51: 170-183 (1994).
41. Verbrugge, R.R.; Strange, W.; Shankweiler, D.P.; Edman, T.R.: What information enables a listener to map a talker's vowel space? J. acoust. Soc. Am. 60: 198-212 (1976).
42. Watkins, A.J.; Makin, S.J.: Perceptual compensation for speaker differences and for spectral envelope distortion. J. acoust. Soc. Am. 96: 1263-1282 (1994).
43. Watkins, A.J.; Makin, S.J.: Effects of spectral contrast on perceptual compensation for spectral-envelope distortion. J. acoust. Soc. Am. 99: 3749-3757 (1996).