Microrough surface of metallic biomaterials: A literature review

Bio-Medical Materials and Engineering

Volumn 6, Issue 3, 1996, Pages 173-189

  Wen, Xuejun ^a   Wang, Xiaoxiang ^a   Zhang, Ning ^a  

^a ZHEJIANG UNIVERSITY   (China)

Author keywords

Biocompatibility; Metallic biomaterials; Microrough surface; Surface analysis; Surface modification; Surface roughness

Indexed keywords

BIOMATERIAL; METAL;

BONE REGENERATION; BONE REMODELING; CELL ADHESION; CELL MOTION; FIBROBLAST; PHYSIOLOGY; PROSTHESES AND ORTHOSES; REVIEW; SURFACE PROPERTY; TOOTH IMPLANTATION;

BIOCOMPATIBLE MATERIALS; BONE REMODELING; CELL ADHESION; CELL MOVEMENT; DENTAL IMPLANTS; FIBROBLASTS; METALS; OSSEOINTEGRATION; PROSTHESES AND IMPLANTS; SURFACE PROPERTIES;

EID: 0030338717     PISSN: 09592989     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3233/bme-1996-6305     Document Type: Review

References (97)

1. D. Buddy, B. Ratner and J.L. Thomas, Biomaterial surfaces, J. Biomed. Mater. Res., App. Biomater. 21 (1987), 59-89.
2. L.Q. Zheng, Tribology, 1st edn, High Education Press, Beijing, P.R. China, 1994, 119-158; 431-434 (in Chinese).
3. B. Cheroudi, T.R. Gould and D.M Brunette, Effects of a grooved epoxy sub-stratum on epithelial cell behavior in vivo and in vitro, J. Biomed. Mater. Res. 22 (1988), 459-477.
4. K.H. Richter, B. Blencke, K.K. Deutscher et al., Surface nature of implant materials and its effect on the proliferation of cells in culture, in: Evaluation of Biomaterials, G.D. Winter, J.L. Leray and K. de Groot, eds, John Wiley, New York, USA, 1980, pp. 361-365.
5. A. Ungersbock, O. Pohler and S.M. Perren, Evaluation of the soft tissue inter-face at titanium implants with different surface treatments: experiment study on rabbits, Bio-Med. Mat. Eng. 4 (1994), 317-325.
6. J.A. Jansen, J.P.C.M. van der Waerdn et al., Epithelial reaction to per-cutaneous implant materials: in vivo and in vitro experiments, J. Invest. Surg. 2 (1989), 29-32.
7. British standard 1134, Assessment of Surface Texture, Part 1, 1972.
8. A. Clemens, van Blitterswijk, B. Dirkjan et al., Reactions of cells at implant surfaces, Biomaterials 12 (1991), 187-193.
9. B.D. Ratner, Surface characterization of biomaterials by electron spectroscopy for chemical analysis, Ann. Biomed. Eng. 11 (1983), 313-336.
10. A.M. Baro, N. Garcia, R. Miranda et al., Characterization of surface roughness in titanium dental implants measured with scanning tunnelling microscopy at atmospheric pressure, Biomaterials 7 (1986), 463-466.
11. B. Kasemo, Biocompatibity of titanium implants: surface science aspects, J. Prosth. Dent. 49 (1983), 832-837.
12. B. Kasemo and J. Lausmaa, Material selection surface characteristics and chemical processes at implant surfaces, in: Tissue Integrated Prostheses; Osseointergtation in Clinical Dentistry, P.-I. Branemark, G.A. Zarb and T. Albrektsson, eds, Quintessence Publishing Co. Inc., Chicago, 1985, pp. 99-113.
13. A. Moroni, V.L. Caja, E.L. Egger et al., Histomorphometry of hydroxyapatite coated and uncoated porous titanium bone implants, Biomaterials 15 (1994), 926-930.
14. A.F. von Recum, New aspects of biocompatibility: motion at the interface, in: Clinical Implant Materials, G. Heimke, U. Soltesz and A.J.C. Lee, eds, Elsevier Science Publishers B.V., Amsterdam, Netherlands, 1990, pp. 297-302.
15. D. Landolt, Fundamental aspects of electropolishing, Electrochim. Acta 32 (1987), 1-11.
16. Y.X. Quan and G.Y. Shi, The Principle of Friction and Abrasion, 1st edn, Zhejiang University Press, Hangzhou, P.R. China, 1986, 23-75 (in Chinese).
17. D.H. Buckley, Surface Effects in Adhesion, Wear, and Lubrication, Tribology series 5, Elsevier Scientific Publishing company, 1981, 1-16.
18. A. Wennerberg, T. Albrektsson, H. Ulrich et al., An optical three-dimensional technique for topographical description of surgical implants, J. Biomed. Eng. 14 (1992), 412-418.
19. D. Buser, H.P. Weber, K. Donath et al., Soft tissue reactions to non-submerged unloaded titanium implants in beagle dogs, J. Periodontol. 63 (1992), 226-236.
20. C. Larsson, P. Thomsen, J. Lausmaa et al., Bone response to surface modified titanium implants: studies on electropolished implants with different oxide thickness and morphology, Biomaterials 15 (1994), 1062-1074.
21. M. Browne and P.J. Gregson, Surface modification of titanium alloy implants, Biomaterials 15 (1994), 894-898.
22. B. Walivaara, B. Aronsson, M. Rodahl et al., Titanium with different oxides: in vitro studies of protein adsorption and contact activation, Biomaterials 15 (1994), 827-834.
23. G.L. Hill, O. Zidan and O. Gomez-Marin, Bond strengths of etched base metals: effects of errors in surface area estimation, J. Prosthet. Dent. 56 (1986), 41-46.
24. V. Geret, B.A. Rahn, R. Mathys et al., A method for testing tissue tolerance for improved quantilative evaluation through reduction of relative motion at the implant-tissue interface, in: Evaluation of Biomaterials, G.D. Winter, J.L. Leray and K. de Groot, eds, John Wiley, New York, USA, 1980, pp. 351-359.
25. J.P. Bobyn, The optimum pore size for the fixation of porous-surfaced metal implants by the ingrowth of bone, Clin. Orthop. and Rel. Res. 150 (1980), 263-270.
26. A.Y. Cheng, Oral Implantology, 1st edn, Scientific Publishing Press of Sichan, Chengdu, P.R. China, Chapter 4, 1991, 83-89 (in Chinese).
27. K.A. Thomas, S.D. Cook, E.A. Renz et al., The effect of surface treatments on the interface mechanics of LTI pyrdytic carbon implants, J. Biomed. Mater. Res. 19 (1985), 145-159.
28. T. Albreketsson and H.A. Hansson, An ultrastructural characterization of the interface between bone and sputtered titanium or stainless steel surface, Biomaterials 7 (1986), 201-205.
29. E. Barth and H. Hero, Bioactive glass ceramic on titanium substrate: The effect of molybdenum as an intermediate bond coating, Biomaterials 7 (1986), 273-276.
30. W.R. Lacefield and L.L. Hench, The bonding of bioglass to a cobalt-chromium surgical implant alloy, Biomaterials 7 (1986), 104-108.
31. U. Gross, Ch. Muller-Mai, Th. Fritz et al., Implant surface roughness and mode of load transmission influence periimplant bone structure, in: Clinical Implant Materials, G. Heimke, U. Soltesz and A.J.C. Lee, eds, Elsevier Science Publishers B.V., Amsterdam, Netherlands, 1990, pp. 303-308.
32. J.E. Griffith, D.A. Grigg, M.J. Vasile et al., Scanning probe metrology, J. of Vacc. Sci. Tech. Appl. 10, 1992, 674-679.
33. D.J. Whitehouse, Stylus techniques, in: Characterization of Solid Surfaces, P.F. Kane and G.R. Stromberg, eds, Plenum Press, New York, 1982, pp. 5-48.
34. R.C. Spragg and D.J. Whitehouse, A new unified approach to surface metrology, Proc. Instn. Mech. Engrs. 185 (1971), 697-707.
35. J.M. Bennett, Measurement of rms roughness, autocovariance function and other statistical properties of optical surfaces using a FECO scanning interferometer, Appl. Opt. 15 (1976), 2705-2721.
36. M. Rasigni, G. Rasigni, J.P. Palmari et al., Study of surface roughness using a microdensitometer analysis of electron micrographs of surface replicas: I. Surface profiles, J. Opt. Soc. Am. 71 (1981), 1124-1133.
37. N. Garcia, A.M. Baró, R. Miranda et al., Surface roughness standards obtained with the scanning tunnelling microscope operated at atmospheric air pressure, Metrologia 21 (1985), 566-569.
38. T.R. Thomas, Characterization of surface roughness, Precis. Eng. 3 (1981), 94-104.
39. V.A. Parsegian, Molecular forces governing tight contact between cellular surfaces and substrates, J. Prosthe. Dent. 49 (1983), 838-842.
40. D.F. Williams, ed., Fundamental aspects of biocompatibility, Vol. II, in: CRC Series on Biocompatibility, CRC Press, Baca Ration, FL, 1981, pp. 43-65.
41. J.E. Sundgren, P. Bodo and I. Lundstrom, Auger electron spectroscopic studies of the interface between human tissue and implants of titanium and stainless steel, J. Colloid Interface Sci. 110 (1986), 9-20.
42. K.E. Healy and P. Ducheyne, The mechanisms of passive dissolution of titanium in a model physiological environment, J. Biomed. Mater. Res. 26 (1992), 319-338.
43. R.J. Solar, S.R. Pollack and E. Korostoff, Corrosion and Degradation of Implant Materials, B.C. Syrett and A. Acharya, eds, ASTM STP 684, Philadelphia, PA, USA, 1979, 161-172.
44. F.R.N. Nabarro and P.J. Jackson, Growth and Perfection of Crystals, R.H. Doremus, B.W. Roberts and D. Turnbull, eds, Wiley, New York, 1958, 13-35.
45. A.C. Fraker and A.W. Ruff, Studies of oxide film formation on titanium alloys in saline water, Corros. Sci. 11 (1971), 763-771.
46. R. Meffert, The soft tissue interface in dental implantology, J. Dent. Ed. 52 (1988), 810-811.
47. U. Donley and W. Gillrtte, Titanium endosseous implant-soft tissue interface: A literature review, J. Periodontl. 62 (1991), 153-160.
48. T. Nakamura, Y. Shimizu, T. Matsui et al., Novel airway stent using a thermal shape-memory NiTi alloy, ASAIO Transactions 37 (1991), M319-M321.
49. D.R. Kuempel, G.K. Johnson, R.S. Zaharias et al., The effects of scaling procedures on epithelial cell growth on titanium surfaces, J. Periodontol. 66 (1995), 228-234.
50. D.M. Brunrtte, G.S. Kenner and T.R.L. Gould, Grooved titanium surfaces orient growth and migration of cells from human gingival explants, J. Dent. Res. 62 (1983), 1045-1048.
51. B. Chehroudi, T.R.L. Gould and D.M. Brunette, Effects of a grooved titanium coated implant surface on epithelial cell behavior in vitro and in vivo, J. Biomed. Mat. Res. 23 (1989), 1067-1085.
52. T. Inoue, J.E. Cox, R.M. Pilliar et al., Effect of the surface geometry of smooth and porous-coated titanium alloy on the orientation of fibroblasts in vitro, J. Biomed. Mat. Res. 21 (1987), 107-126.
53. S. Pitaru, A. Gray, J.E. Aubin et al., The influence of the morphological and chemical nature of dental surface on the migration, attachment and orientation of human gingival fibroblast in vitro, J. Periodont. Res. 19 (1984), 408-418.
54. B.F. Bellows, A.H. Melcher and J.E. Aubin, Association between tension and orientation of periodontal ligament fibroblast and exogenous collagen fibers in collagen gels in vitro, J. Cell Sci. 58 (1982), 125-128.
55. M. Kononen, M. Hormia, J. Kivilahti et al., Effects of surface processing on the attachment, orientation, and proliferation of human gingival fibroblasts on titanium, J. Biomed. Mater. Res. 26 (1992), 1325-1337.
56. D.O. Adams, The granulomatous inflammatory response: A review, Am. J. Pathol. 84 (1976), 164-191.
57. S.R. Taylor and D.F. Gibbons, Effect of surface texture on the soft tissue response to polymer implant, J. Biomed. Mat. Res. 17 (1983), 205-227.
58. S.A. Jimenez, W. McArthur and J. Rosenbloom, Inhibition of collagen synthesis by mononuclear cell supernates, J. Exp. Med. 150 (1979), 1421-1431.
59. S.M. Perren, The concept of biological plating using the limited contact dynamic compression plate (LC-DCP), Injury 22 (1991), 1-41.
60. R. McKinney, D.E. Steflik and D.L. Koth, Per, peri, or trans? A concept for improved dental terminology, J. Prosth. Dent. 52 (1984), 267-275.
61. R. McKinney, D.E. Steflik and D.L. Koth, Evidence for a junctional epithelial attachment to ceramic dental implants, J. Periodontol. 56 (1985), 579-591.
62. T.R.L. Gould, L. Westbury and D.M. Brunette, Ultrastructural study of the attachment of human gingival to titanium in vivo, J. Prosth. Dent. 52 (1984), 418-420.
63. K. Gotfredsen, E. Rostrup, E. Hjoerting-Hansen et al., Histological and histomorphometrical evaluation of tissue reactions adjacent to endosteal implants in monkeys, Clin. Oral Implants Res. 2 (1991), 30-37.
64. D.A. Deporter, P.A. Watson, R.M. Pillial et al., A histological evaluation of a functional endossous, porous-surfaced, titanium alloy dental implant system in the dog, J. Dent. Res. 67 (1988), 1190-1195.
65. A. Schroeder, E. van der Zypen, H. Stich et al., The reaction of bone, connective tissue and epithelium to endosteal implants with sprayed titanium surfaces, J. Maxillofac. Surg. 9 (1981), 15-25.
66. D. Buser, R.K. Schack, S. Steinemann et al., Influence of surface characteristics on bone integration of titanium implants: a histomorphometric study in miniature pigs, J. Biomed. Mater. Res. 25 (1991), 889-902.
67. H.-J. Wilke, L. Claes and S. Steinemann, The influence of various titanium surfaces on the interface shear strength between implants and bone, in: Clinical Implant Materials, G. Heimke, U. Soltesz and A.J.C. Lee, eds, Elsevier Science Publishers B.V., Amsterdam, Netherlands, 1990, pp. 309-314.
68. H. Oonishi, E. Tsuji, H. Ishimaru et al., Best weightbearing time after implantation as inferred from interface observation, in: Clinical Implant Materials, G. Heimke, U. Soltesz and A.J.C. Lee, eds, Elsevier Science Publishers B.V., Amsterdam, Netherlands, 1990, pp. 361-366.
69. L. Sennerby, P. Thomsen and L.E. Ericson, Early tissue response to titanium implants inserted in rabbit cortical bone: I. Light microscopic observations, J. Mater. Sci.: Mater. Med. 4 (1993), 240-250.
70. L. Sennerby, P. Thomsen and L.E. Ericson, A morphometric and biomechanic comparison of titanium implants inserted in rabbit cortical and cancellous bone, Int. J. Oral Maxillofac. Impl. 7 (1992), 62-71.
71. K. Hayashi, T. Inadome, H. Tsumura et al., Effect of surface roughness of hydroxyapatite-coated titanium on the bone-implant interface shear strength, Biomaterials 15(14) (1994), 1187-1191.
72. J.C. Keller and F.A. Young, Quantitative bone remodelling resulting from the use of porous dental implants, J. Biomed. Mater. Res. 21 (1987), 305-319.
73. I. Linkow, A.W. Rinaldi, W.W. Weiss et al., Factors influencing long-term implant success, J. Prosthet. Dent. 63 (1990), 64-73.
74. L.I. Linkow, Evaluation of the vent implant osseointegrated compatible implant system, Int. J. Oral Maxillofac. Implant 2 (1988), 109-122.
75. D.A. Heck, I. Nakajima, E.Y. Chao et al., The effects of immobilization on biological ingrowth into porous titanium fiber metal prostheses, Trans. Orthoped. Res. Soc. 9 (1984), 178-184.
76. P. Chen, T.M. Turner, H. Ronningen et al., A canine cementless total hip prosthesis mode, Clin. Orthoped. Rel. Res. 176 (1983), 24-33.
77. J.N. Kent, S.D. Cook, A.W. Weinstein et al., A functional comparison of LTI carbon, alumina, and carbon coated alumina blade type implants in baboons, J. Biomed. Mater. Res. 16 (1982), 887-899.
78. R.M. Pilliar, D.A. Deporter, P.A. Watoson et al., Dental implant design effect on bone remolding, J. Biomed. Mater. Res. 25 (1991), 467-476.
79. D.H. Kaelble, Physical Chemistry of Adhesion, Wiley-Interscience, New York, 1971, 149-189.
80. C.A. Ward, A. Koheil, W.R. Johnson et al., Reduction in complement activation from biomaterials by removal of air nuclei from the surface roughness, J. Biomed. Mater. Res. 18 (1984), 255-269.
81. V. Marc, Biology and chemistry of thrombosis, in: Thrombolysis: Basic Contributions and Clinical Progress, E. Haber, ed., Mosby-Year Book Inc., St. Louis, USA, 1991, pp. 3-16.
82. J.E. Sundgren, P. Bodo and I. Lundstrom, Auger electron spectroscopic studies of the interface between human tissue and implants of titanium and stainless steel, J. Colloid Interface Sci. 110 (1986), 9-20.
83. W. Becker, B.E. Becker, M.G. Newman et al., Clinical and microbiologie findings that may contribute to dental implant failure, Int. J. Oral Maxillofac. Implant 5 (1990), 31-38.
84. L. Lindquist, B. Rockier and G. Carlsson, Bone resorption around fixtures in edentulous patients treated with mandibular fixed tissue-integrated prostheses, J. Pros. Dent. 59(1) (1988), 59-63.
85. H.J. Busscher and A.H. Weerkamp, Specific and non-specific interactions in bacterial adhesion to solid substrata, FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 30 (1985), 103-106.
86. M.L. Swartz and R.W. Phillips, Comparison of bacterial accumulations on rough and smooth enamel surfaces, J. Periodontol. 28 (1957), 304-307.
87. J. McCollum, R.B. O'Neal, W.A. Brennan et al., The effect of titanium implant abutment surface irregularities on plaque accumulation in vivo, J. Periodontol. 63 (1992), 802-805.
88. S.C. Fox, J.D. Moriarty and R.P. Kusy, The effects of scaling at titanium implant surface with metal and plastic instruments: an in vitro study, J. Periodontol. 61 (1990), 485-490.
89. J.W. Rapley, R.H. Swan, W.W. Hallmon et al., The surface characteristics produced by various oral hygiene instruments and materials on titanium implant abutments, Int. J. Oral Maxillofac. Implants 5 (1990), 47-52.
90. R.M. Rosenberg and M.M. Ash, The effect of root roughness on plaque accumulation and gingival inflammation, J. Periodontol. 45 (1974), 146-150.
91. J.A. Clayton and E. Green, Roughness of pontic materials and dental plaque, J. Prosth. Dent. 23 (1970), 407-411.
92. M. Quirynen, H.C. van der Mei, C.M.L. Bollen et al., The influence of surface-free energy on supra- and subgingival plaque microbiology: an in vivo study on implants, J. Periodontol. 65 (1994), 162-167.
93. I.D. Manddel, Markers of periodontal disease susceptibility and activity derived from saliva, in: Perriodontal Diseases, Vol. 3, N.W. Johnson, ed., Syndicate Press of the University of Cambridge, Melbourne, Australia, 1991, pp. 228-253.
94. J.T. Grbic, I.B. Lamster, J.B. Fine et al., Risk indicators for future clinical attachment loss in adult periodontitis: Patient variables, J. Periodontol. 62 (1991), 322-329.
95. D.K. Dennison, M.B. Huerzeler, C. Quinones et al., Contaminated implant surfaces: an in vitro comparison of implant surface coating and treatment modalities for decontamination, J. Periodontol. 65 (1994), 942-961.
96. S. Olson, H. Arzate, A.S. Narayanan et al., Cell attachment activity of cementum proteins and mechanism of endotoxin inhibition, J. Dent. Res. 70 (1991), 1272-1277.
97. M.K. Zablotsky, D.L. Diedich, R.M. Meffert et al., The ability of various chemotherapeutic agents to detoxify the endotoxin infected HA-coated implant surface, Int. J. Oral Implant 8 (1991), 45-51.