Clinical value of mammography, ultrasound and MR imaging during the first year after breast conserving therapy of breast cancer;Klinischer stellenwert bildgebender verfahren im ersten jahr nach brusterhaltender therapie des mammakarzinoms

RoFo Fortschritte auf dem Gebiet der Rontgenstrahlen und der Bildgebenden Verfahren

Volumn 176, Issue 10, 2004, Pages 1423-1430

  Birrenbach, S ^a,b   Miller, S ^a   Stern, W ^a   Xydeas, T ^a   Pietsch Breitfeld, B ^a   Belka, C ^a   Fersis, N ^a   Claussen, C D ^a   Muller Schimpfle M ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL TÜBINGEN   (Germany)

^b Tropenklin Paul Lechler Krankenhaus   (Germany)

Author keywords

Breast conserving therapy; Breast MR; Breast neoplasms; Breast ultrasound; Mammography

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BREAST CANCER; CANCER ADJUVANT THERAPY; CANCER RADIOTHERAPY; CANCER RECURRENCE; CANCER STAGING; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; ECHOGRAPHY; FOLLOW UP; HISTOLOGY; HUMAN; MAMMOGRAPHY; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

ADULT; AGED; BREAST NEOPLASMS; COMBINED MODALITY THERAPY; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HUMANS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MAMMOGRAPHY; MIDDLE AGED; NEOPLASM RECURRENCE, LOCAL; RADIOTHERAPY, ADJUVANT; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; TIME FACTORS; TREATMENT OUTCOME; ULTRASONOGRAPHY, MAMMARY;

EID: 6044245809     PISSN: 14389029     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1055/s-2004-813457     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Grosse A, Schreer I, Frischbier HJ et al. Results of breast conserving therapy for early breast cancer and the role of mammographic follow-up. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 1997; 38: 761-767
2. Touboul E, Buffat L, Belkacemi Y et al. Local recurrences and distant metastases after breast-conserving surgery and radiation therapy for early breast cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 1999; 43: 25-38
3. Veronesi U, Luini A, DelVecchio M et al. Radiotherapy after breast-preserving surgery in women with localized cancer of the breast. N Engl J Med 1993; 328: 1587-1591
4. Buchberger W, DeKoekkoek-Doll P, Obrist P et al. Der Stellenwert der MR-Tomographie beim unklaren Mammographiebefund. Radiologe 1997; 37: 702-709
5. Heywang-Köbrunner SH, Schlegel A, Beck R et al. Contrast-enhanced MRI of the breast after limited surgery and radiation therapy. J Comput Assist Tomogr 1993; 17: 891-900
6. Hitchcock YJ, Proulx GM, Stomper PC. Contrast-enhanced MRI for the assessment of local recurrence after breast conservation. Am J Clin Oncol 2002; 25 (4): 428-429
7. Kinkel K, Hylton NM. Challenges to interpretation of breast MRI. J Magn Reson Imaging 2001; 13 (6): 821-829
8. Morakkabati N, Leutner CC, Schmiedel A et al. Breast MR Imaging in Patients during or soon after Radiotherapy (RT): How Significant are Radiation-induced Changes and Do They Interfere with Diagnostic Accuracy? Supplement to Radiology 1999; 213: 1524 (Abstract)
9. Dershaw DD. Mammography in patients with breast cancer treated by breast conservation (lumpectomy with or without radiation). AJR Am J Roentgenol 1995; 164: 309-316
10. Balu-Maestro C, Bruneton JN, Geoffray A et al. Ultrasonographic posttreatment follow-up of breast cancer patients. J Ultrasound Med 1991; 10: 1-7
11. Slobodnikoya J. Changes after conservative surgical treatment for early breast carcinoma: comparison of sonographic and bioptic findings. Neoplasma 1999; 46: 179-181
12. Müller RD, Barkhausen J, Sauerwein W et al. Assessment of local recurrence after breast-conserving therapy with MRI. J Comput Assist Tomogr 1998; 22: 408-412
13. Wersebe A, Xydeas T, Clauß T et al. Quantitative Erfassung von Gewebsveränderungen der Mamma nach brusterhaltender Therapie mit der dynamischen MR-Mammographie. Fortschr Röntgenstr 2001; 173: 1109-1117
14. Altman DG. Inter-Rater Agreement. In: Altman DG. Practical Statistics for Medical Research. London: Chapman and Hall, 1991: 403-419
15. Drew PJ, Kerin MJ, Turnbull LW et al. Routine screening for local recurrence following breast-conserving therapy for cancer with dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging of the breast. Ann Surg Oncol 1998; 5: 265-270
16. Jager JJ, Langendijk JA, Dohmen JP et al. Mammography in the follow-up after breast-conserving treatment in cancer of the breast: suitability for mammographic interpretation, validity and interobserver variation. Br J Radiol 1995; 68: 754-760
17. Buchberger W, Hamberger L, Schön G et al. Mammographie und Sonographie in der Rezidivdiagnostik nach brusterhaltender Therapie des Mammakarzinoms. Fortschr Röntgenstr 1991; 154: 650-656
18. Aichinger U, Albert U, de Waal J et al. Wertigkeit bildgebender Verfahren in der Diagnose Mammakarzinomrezidiv - Ergebnisse einer Multicenterstudie (1977-1999). Fortschr Röntgenstr 2001; 173: S15
19. Aichinger U, Schulz-Wendtland R, Krämer S et al. Narbe oder Rezidiv? Einsatz der signalverstärkten Doppler-Sonographie im Vergleich zur MRT. Fortschr Röntgenstr 2002; 174: 1395-1401
20. Krämer S, Schulz-Wendtland R, Hagedorn K et al. Magnetic resonance imaging in the diagnosis of local recurrences in breast cancer. Anticancer Res 1998; 18: 2159-2161
21. Rieber A, Merkle E, Zeitler H et al. Value of MR mammography in the detection and exclusion of recurrent breast carcinoma. J Comput Assist Tomogr 1997; 21: 780-784
22. Mumtaz H, Davidson T, Hall-Craggs MA et al. Comparison of magnetic resonance imaging and conventional triple assessment in locally recurrent breast cancer. Br J Surg 1997; 84: 1147-1151
23. Gilles R, Guinebretiere JM, Shapeero LG et al. Assessment of breast cancer recurrence with contrast-enhanced subtraction MR imaging: preliminary results in 26 patients. Radiology 1993; 188: 473-478
24. Dao TH, Rahmouni A, Campana F et al. Tumor recurrence versus fibrosis in the irradiated breast: differentiation with dynamic gadolinium-enhanced MR imaging. Radiology 1993; 187: 751-755
25. Viehweg P, Heinig A, Lampe D et al. Retrospective analysis for evaluation of the value of contrast-enhanced MRI in patients treated with breast conservative therapy. MAGMA 1998; 7: 141-152
26. Ciccone G, Vineis P, Frigerio A et al. Inter-observer and intra-observer variability of mammogram interpretation: a field study. Eur J Cancer 1992; 28: 1054-1058