Prospective sonographic study of 3093 breast tumors

Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine

Volumn 18, Issue 5, 1999, Pages 363-370

  Chao, Tzu Chieh ^a   Lo, Yung Feng ^b   Chen, Shin Cheh ^b   Chen, Miin Fu ^b  

^a CHANG GUNG MEMORIAL HOSPITAL   (Taiwan)

^b NONE

Author keywords

Echogenicity; Fibroadenoma; Invasive ductal carcinoma; Microcalcification

Indexed keywords

CARDIOLOGY; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; ONCOLOGY; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; ULTRASONIC APPLICATIONS;

BIOPSY; BREAST TUMORS; ECHOGENICITY; FIBROADENOMA; INVASIVE DUCTAL CARCINOMA; MICROCALCIFICATION; SONOGRAPHY;

ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BREAST CALCIFICATION; BREAST CARCINOMA; BREAST DISEASE; BREAST FIBROADENOMA; BREAST TUMOR; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; ECHOGRAPHY; FEMALE; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; PREDICTION; TUMOR BIOPSY;

EID: 0032907456     PISSN: 02784297     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.7863/jum.1999.18.5.363     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Jackson VP: The role of US in breast imaging. Radiology 177:305, 1990
2. Hall FM: Sonography of the breast: Controversies and opinions. AJR 169:1635, 1997
3. Staren ED, O'Neill TP: Breast ultrasound. Surg Clin North Am 78:219, 1998
4. Kolb TM, Lichy J, Newhouse JH: Occult cancer in women with dense breasts: Detection with screening US-Diagnostic yield and tumor characteristics. Radiology 207:191, 1998
5. Ma L, Fishell E, Wright B, et al: Case control study of factors associated with failure to detect breast cancer by mammography. J Natl Cancer Inst 84:781, 1992
6. Fajardo L, Hillman BJ, Frey C: Correlation between breast parenchymal patterns and mammographic certainly of diagnosis. Invest Radiol 23:505, 1988
7. Jackson VP, Hendrick RE, Feig SA, et al: Imaging of the radiographically dense breast. Radiology 188:297, 1993
8. Staren ED: Surgical office-based ultrasound of the breast. Am Surg 61:619, 1995
9. Rizzatto G, Chersevani R, Abbona M, et al: High-resolution sonography of breast carcinoma. Eur J Radiol 24:11, 1997
10. Chalas E, Valea F: The gynecologist and surgical procedures for breast disease. Clin Obstet Gynecol 37:948, 1994
11. Stavros AT, Thickman D, Rapp CL, et al: Solid breast nodules: Use of sonography to distinguish between benign and malignant lesions. Radiology 196:123, 1995
12. Vlaisavljevic V: Differentiation of solid breast tumors on the basis of their primary echographic characteristics as revealed by real-time scanning of the uncompressed breast. Ultrasound Med Biol 14(Suppl):75, 1988
13. Skaane P, Engedal K: Analysis of sonographic features in the differentiation of fibroadenoma and invasive ductal carcinoma. AJR 170:109, 1998
14. Fornage BD, Lorigan JG, Andry E: Fibroadenoma of the breast: Sonographic appearance. Radiology 172:671, 1989
15. Harper AP, Kelly-Fry E, Noe JS, et al: Ultrasound in the evaluation of solid breast masses. Radiology 146:731, 1983
16. 3. J Ultrasound Med 9:559, 1990
17. Bamber JC, Gonzales LD, Cosgrove DO, et al: Quantitative evaluation of real-time ultrasound features of the breast. Ultrasound Med Biol 14(Suppl):81, 1988
18. Leucht WJ, Rabe DR, Humbert KD: Diagnostic value of different interpretative criteria in real-time sonography of the breast. Ultrasound Med Biol 14(Suppl):59, 1988
19. Guyer PB, Dewbury KC, Waswick D, et al: Direct contact B-scan ultrasound in the diagnosis of solid breast masses. Clin Radiol 37:458, 1986
20. Cole-Beuglet C, Soriano RZ, Kurtz B, et al: Ultrasound analysis of 104 primary breast carcinomas classified according to histopathologic type. Radiology 147:191, 1983
21. Cole-Beuglet C, Soriano RZ, Kurtz AB, et al: Fibro-adenoma of the breast: Sonomammography correlated with pathology in 122 patients. AJR 140:369, 1983
22. Adler DD, Hyde DL, Ikeda DM: Quantitative sonographic parameters as a means of differentiating breast cancers from benign solid breast masses. J Ultrasound Med 10:505, 1991
23. Jackson VP: Sonography of malignant breast disease. Semin Ultrasound CT MR 10:119, 1989
24. Feig SA: Breast masses. Mammographic and sonographic evaluation. Radiol Clin North Am 30:67, 1998
25. Venta LA, Dudiak CM, Salomen CG, et al: Sonographic evaluation of the breast. RadioGraphics 14:29, 1994
26. Meyer JE, Amin E, Lindfors KK, et al: Medullary carcinoma of the breast: Mammographic and US appearance. Radiology 170:79, 1989
27. Kelly-Fry E, Morris ST, Jackson VP, et al: Variation of transducer frequency output and receiver band-pass characteristics for improved detection and image characterization of solid breast masses. Ultrasound Med Biol 14:143, 1988
28. Ueno E, Tohno E, Soeda S, et al: Dynamic tests in real-time breast echography. Ultrasound Med Biol 14(Suppl): 53, 1988
29. Patchefsdy AS, Shaber GS, Rubin CS: Clinical experience with a prototype real-time dedicated breast scanner. AJR 139:905, 1982
30. D'Astous FT, Foster FS: Frequency dependence of ultrasound attenuation and backscatter in breast tissue. Ultrasound Med Biol 12:795, 1986
31. Hayashi N, Tamaki N, Honekura Y, et al: Real-time sonography of palpable breast masses. Br J Radiol 58:611, 1985
32. Kossoff G: Causes of shadowing in breast sonography. Ultrasound Med Biol 14(Suppl):211, 1988
33. Guyer PB, Dewbury KC, Rubin CM, et al: Ultrasonographic attenuation in fibroadenoma of the breast. Clin Radiol 45:175, 1992
34. Jackson VP, Kelly-Fry E, Rothschild PA, et al: Automated breast sonography using a 7.5 MHz PVDF transducer: Preliminary clinical evaluation. Radiology 159:679, 1986
35. Kasumi F: Can microcalcification located within breast carcinomas be detected by ultrasound imaging? Ultrasound Med Biol 14(Suppl):175, 1988