Initial in Vivo Results of the New Medtronic Advantage™ Bileaflet Valve in Aortic Position and Comparison to the SJM

Vascular

Volumn 10, Issue 5, 2002, Pages 494-499

  Kleine, Peter ^a   Klesius, Armin A ^a   Scherer, Mirella ^a   Abdel Rahman, Ulf ^a   Moritz, Anton ^a  

^a GOETHE UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

Author keywords

aortic valve; coronary flow; hemodynamics; mechanical heart valve

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ANIMAL MODEL; ANIMAL TISSUE; AORTA VALVE REPLACEMENT; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORONARY ARTERY BLOOD FLOW; DEVICE; DIASTOLE; HEART OUTPUT; HEMODYNAMICS; IN VIVO STUDY; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; NONHUMAN; PRESSURE GRADIENT; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SAINT JUDE HEART VALVE PROSTHESIS; SWINE; SYSTOLE;

ANIMALS; AORTIC VALVE; BLOOD PRESSURE; CORONARY CIRCULATION; CORONARY VESSELS; HEART VALVE PROSTHESIS; HEART VALVE PROSTHESIS IMPLANTATION; HEMODYNAMIC PROCESSES; PROSTHESIS DESIGN; ROTATION; SWINE;

EID: 0036792068     PISSN: 17085381     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/096721090201000509     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Zingg, U. Aeschbacher, B. Seiler, C. et al. Early experience with the new Masters series of St. Jude Medical heart valve: in vivo hemodynamic and clinical results in patients with narrowed aortic annulus. Journal of Heart Valve Disease, 1997, 6, 535-541.
2. Travis, B. R. Heinrich, R. S. Ensley, A. E. et al. The hemodynamic effects of mechanical valve type and orientation on fluid mechanical energy loss and pressure drop in in vitro models of ventricular hypertrophy. Journal of Heart Valve Disease, 1998, 7, 345-354.
3. Butchard, E. G. Hui-Hua, L. Payne, N. et al. Twenty years' experience with the Medtronic Hall valve. Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, 2001, 121, 1090-1100.
4. Hachida, U. Koyanagi, H. Nonoyama, M. et al. Serial hemodynamic study after aortic valve replacement in patients with narrow aortic roots. Journal of Heart Valve Disease, 1998, 7, 81-85.
5. Yoganathan, A. P. Chaux, A. Gray, R. J. et al. Bileaflet, tilting disc and porcine aortic valve substitutes: in vitro hydrodynamic characteristics. Journal of the American College of Cardiologists, 1984, 3, 313-320.
6. Moritz, A. Klepetko, W. Rodler, S. et al. Six-year follow-up after heart valve replacement with the Edwards Duromedics bileaflet prosthesis. European Journal of Cardiothoracic Surgery, 1993, 7, 84-90.
7. Reul, H. van Son, J. A. M. Steinseifer, U. et al. In vitro comparison of bileaflet aortic valve prostheses. Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, 1993, 3, 412-420.
8. Horstkotte, D. Bergemann, R. Althaus, U. et al. German experience with low intensity anticoagulation (GELIA): protocol of a multi-center randomized, prospective study with the St Jude Medical valve. Journal of Heart Valve Disease, 1993, 2, 411-419.
9. Kleine, P. Perthel, M. Nygaard, H. et al. Medtronic Hall versus St. Jude Medical mechanical aortic valve: downstream turbulence with respect to rotation in pigs. Journal of Heart Valve Disease, 1998, 7, 548-555.
10. Kleine, P. Hasenkam, J. M. Nygaard, H. et al. Tilting disc versus bileaflet aortic valve substitutes: intraoperative and postoperative hemodynamic performance in humans. Journal of Heart Valve Disease, 2000, 9, 308-312.
11. Wang, S. Y. Stamler, A. Tofukuji, M. et al. Effects of blood and cristalloid cardioplegia on adrenergic and myogenic vascular mechanisms. Annals of Thoracic Surgery, 1997, 63, 41-49.
12. Grund, F. Sommerschild, H. T. Kirkeboen, K. A. et al. A new approach to normalize myocardial temperature in the open-chest pig model. American Journal of Applied Physiology, 1998, 84, 2190-2197.
13. Sachs, L. Angeuiandte Statistik. 8th edn, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1997.
14. Acar, J. and Bodnar, E. Textbook of Acquired Heart Valve Disease, 1st edn, ICR Publishers, London, 1995.
15. Nygaard, H. Paulsen, P. K. Hasenkam, J. M. et al. Quantitation of the turbulent shear stress distribution of normal, diseased and artificial valve prostheses in human beings. Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, 1992, 6, 609-617.
16. Walker, P. G. Pedersen, E. M. Oyre, S. et al. Magnetic resonance velocity imaging: a new method for prosthetic heart valve study. Journal of Heart Valve Disease, 1995, 4, 296-307.
17. Jin, X.Y. Gibson, D.G. Pepper, J.R. The effects of cardioplegia on coronary pressure-flow velocity relationships during aortic valve replacement. European Journal of Cardiothoracic Surgery 1995; 16:324-330
18. Jin, X. Y. Gibson, D. G. and Pepper, J. R. The relationship of myocardial stroke work to coronary flow velocity immediately after aortic valve replacement. Annals of Thoracic Surgery, 1999, 67, 705-710.
19. Kohler, J. A compasrison of pressure- and volume-loss of technical and biological heart valve prostheses. Zeitschrift Kardiologie, 1986, 75(Suppl. 2), 272-276.
20. Travis, T. R. Heinrich, R. S. Ensley, A. E. et al. The hemodynamic effects of mechanical prosthetic valve type and orientation on fluid mechanical energy loss and pressure drop in in vitro models of ventricular hypertrophy. Journal of Heart Valve Disease, 1998, 7 (3), 345-354.