|
Volumn 9, Issue 2, 2000, Pages 308-312
|
Tilting disc versus bileaflet aortic valve substitutes: Intraoperative and postoperative hemodynamic performance in humans
a b b a a a,c |
Author keywords
[No Author keywords available]
|
Indexed keywords
ADULT;
AGED;
AORTA STENOSIS;
AORTA VALVE;
ARTICLE;
CALCULATION;
CLINICAL ARTICLE;
FEMALE;
FLOW KINETICS;
FOLLOW UP;
HEART HEMODYNAMICS;
HEART LEFT VENTRICLE MASS;
HUMAN;
MALE;
PRESSURE GRADIENT;
PRIORITY JOURNAL;
PROSPECTIVE STUDY;
REGRESSION ANALYSIS;
TRANSESOPHAGEAL ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY;
ULTRASOUND TRANSDUCER;
AGED;
AORTIC VALVE STENOSIS;
BLOOD FLOW VELOCITY;
BLOOD PRESSURE;
ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY, TRANSESOPHAGEAL;
EQUIPMENT FAILURE ANALYSIS;
FEMALE;
HEART VALVE PROSTHESIS;
HEMODYNAMIC PROCESSES;
HUMANS;
INTRAOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS;
MALE;
MIDDLE AGED;
POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS;
PROSPECTIVE STUDIES;
PROSTHESIS DESIGN;
REOPERATION;
|
EID: 0034077342
PISSN: 09668519
EISSN: None
Source Type: Journal
DOI: None Document Type: Article |
Times cited : (35)
|
References (8)
|