Maximizing prosthetic valve size with the top Hat® supra-annular aortic valve

Journal of Heart Valve Disease

Volumn 16, Issue 1, 2007, Pages 84-90

  Aagaard, Jan ^a   Geha, Alexander S ^b  

^a ODENSE UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Denmark)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT CHICAGO   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; AORTA VALVE DISEASE; AORTA VALVE PROSTHESIS; AORTA VALVE REPLACEMENT; ARTICLE; BLOOD VESSEL DIAMETER; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORONARY ARTERY BYPASS GRAFT; EQUIPMENT DESIGN; FEMALE; HEART HEMODYNAMICS; HEART LEFT VENTRICLE HYPERTROPHY; HEART LEFT VENTRICLE WORK; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PATIENT SAFETY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RISK REDUCTION; SURGICAL MORTALITY; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; UNITED STATES;

ADULT; AGED; AORTIC VALVE; BODY WEIGHTS AND MEASURES; FEMALE; HEART VALVE DISEASES; HEART VALVE PROSTHESIS; HEART VALVE PROSTHESIS IMPLANTATION; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED;

EID: 33846926368     PISSN: 09668519     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Rahimtoola SH. The problem of valve prosthesis-patient mismatch. Circulation 1978;58:20-24
2. Tasca, G, Brunelli, F, Cirillo, M, et al. Impact of the improvement of valve area achieved with aortic valve replacement on the regression of left ventricular hypertrophy in patients with pure aortic stenosis. Ann Thorac Surg 2005;79:1291-1296; discussion 1296
3. Fuster, RG, Montero Argudo, JA, Albarova, OG, et al. Patient-prosthesis mismatch in aortic valve replacement: Really tolerable? Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2005;27:441-449; discussion 449
4. Pibarot P, Dumesnil JG. Hemodynamic and clinical impact of prosthesis-patient mismatch in the aortic valve position and its prevention. J Am Coll Cardiol 2000;36:1131-1141
5. Mohty-Echahidi, D, Malouf, JF, Girard, SE, et al. Impact of prosthesis-patient mismatch on long-term survival in patients with small St. Jude Medical mechanical prostheses in the aortic position. Circulation 2006;113:420-426
6. Blais, C, Dumesnil, JG, Baillot, R, Simard, S, Doyle, D, Pibarot, P. Impact of valve prosthesis-patient mismatch on short-term mortality after aortic valve replacement. Circulation 2003;108:983-988
7. Tasca, G, Mhagna, Z, Perotti, S, et al. Impact of prosthesis-patient mismatch on cardiac events and midterm mortality after aortic vane replacement in patients with pure aortic stenosis. Circulation 2006;113:570-576
8. Rao, V, Jamieson, WR, Ivanov, J, Armstrong, S, David, TE. Prosthesis-patient mismatch affects survival after aortic valve replacement. Circulation 2000;102:III5-III9
9. Milano, AD, De Carlo, M, Mecozzi, G, et al. Clinical outcome in patients with 19-mm and 21-mm St. Jude aortic prostheses: Comparison at long-term follow-up. Ann Thorac Surg 2002;73:37-43
10. Moon, MR, Pasque, MK, Munfakh, NA, et al. Prosthesis-patient mismatch after aortic valve replacement: Impact of age and body size on late survival. Ann Thorac Surg 2006;81:481-488; discussion 489
11. Blackstone, EH, Cosgrove, DM, Jamieson, WR, et al. Prosthesis size and long-term survival after aortic valve replacement. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2003;126:783-796
12. Christakis, GT, Joyner, CD, Morgan, CD, et al. Left ventricular mass regression early after aortic valve replacement. Ann Thorac Surg 1996;62:1084-1089
13. Del Rizzo, DF, Abdoh, A, Cartier, P, Doty, D, Westaby, S. Factors affecting left ventricular mass regression after aortic valve replacement with stentless valves. Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1999;11:114-120
14. Tasca, G, Brunelli, F, Cirillo, M, et al. Impact of valve prosthesis-patient mismatch on left ventricular mass regression following aortic valve replacement. Ann Thorac Surg 2005;79:505-510
15. Connolly, HM, Oh, JK, Schaff, HV, et al. Severe aortic stenosis with low transvalvular gradient and severe left ventricular dysfunction: Result of aortic valve replacement in 52 patients. Circulation 2000;101:1940-1946
16. Lundblad, R, Hagen, OM, Smith, G, Kvernebo, K. The CarboMedics supraannular top hat valve improves prosthesis size in the aortic root. J Heart Valve Dis 2001;10:196-201
17. Gillinov AM, Blackstone EH, Alster JM, et al. The CarboMedics Top Hat supraannular aortic valve: A multicenter study. Ann Thorac Surg 2003;75:1175-1180
18. Roedler, S, Moritz, A, Wutte, M, Hoda, R, Wolner, E. The CarboMedics 'top hat' supraannular prosthesis in the small aortic root. J Card Surg 1995;10:198-204
19. Strike, PC, Edwards, TJ, Gardiner, D, Livesey, SA, Simpson, IA. Functional hemodynamic assessment of the 21-mm and 23-mm CarboMedics Top Hat aortic prosthetic valve. J Card Surg 1998;13:98-103
20. de Brux, JL, Subayi, JB, Binuani, P, Laporte, J. Doppler-echocardiographic assessment of the CarboMedics supra-annular 'Top-Hat' prosthetic heart valve in the aortic position. J Heart Valve Dis 1996;5(Suppl.3):S336-S338
21. Bernal, JM, Martin-Duran, R, Rabasa, JM, Revuelta, JM. The CarboMedics 'Top-Hat' supraannular prosthesis. Ann Thorac Surg 1999;67:1299-1303
22. Binuani, P, Baufreton, C, Subayi, JB, de Brux, JL. The CarboMedics 'Top-Hat' aortic valve prosthesis: Short-term results. J Heart Valve Dis 2000;9:693-696
23. Craver, J. CarboMedics prosthetic heart valve. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 1999;15(Suppl.1):S3-S11; discussion S39-S43