Functional hemodynamic assessment of the 21-mm and 23-mm CarboMedics Top Hat aortic prosthetic valve

Journal of Cardiac Surgery

Volumn 13, Issue 2, 1998, Pages 98-103

  Strike, Philip C ^a   Edwards, Timothy J ^a   Gardiner, Diane ^a   Livesey, Steven A ^a   Simpson, Iain A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL SOUTHAMPTON NHS FOUNDATION TRUST   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; AORTA PROSTHESIS; AORTA VALVE REGURGITATION; ARTICLE; BACTERIAL ENDOCARDITIS; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CORONARY ARTERY BYPASS GRAFT; ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HEART ARREST; HEART FAILURE; HEART VALVE REPLACEMENT; HUMAN; MALE; MITRAL VALVE; MITRAL VALVE DISEASE; REOPERATION; STANDARDIZATION; TREADMILL EXERCISE;

EID: 0032447536     PISSN: 08860440     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-8191.1998.tb01241.x     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Teoh KH, Fulop JC, Weisel RD, et al: Aortic valve replacement with a small prosthesis. Circulation 1987;76(Suppl III):III-123.
2. Rahimtoola SH: The problem of valve prosthesis patient mismatch. Circulation 1978;58:20-24.
3. Jones EL, Craver JM, Morris DC, et al: Haemodynamic and clinical evaluation of the Hancock xenograft bioprosthesis for aortic valve replacement (with emphasis on the management of the small aortic root). J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1978; 75:300-308.
4. DePaulis R, Sommariva L, Russo F, et al: Doppler echocardiography evaluation of the CarboMedics valve in patients with small aortic annulus and valve prosthesis - body surface area mismatch. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1994;108:57-62.
5. Chafizadeh ER, Zoghbi WA: Doppler echocardiographic assessment of the St. Jude Medical prosthetic valve in the aortic position using the continuity equation. Circulation 1991;83:213-223.
6. Tatineni S, Barrier HB, Pearson AC, et al: Rest and exercise evaluation of the St. Jude Medical and Medtronic Hall prostheses. Influence of primary lesion, valvular type, valvular size, and left ventricular function. Circulation 1989;80(Suppl I):I16-I23.
7. Gardin JM, Kozlowski J, Dabestani A, et al: Studies of Doppler aortic flow velocity during supine bi-cycle exercise. Am J Cardiol 1986;57:327-332.
8. Burstow DJ, Nishimura RA, Bailey KR, et al: Continuous wave Doppler echocardiographic measurement of prosthetic valve gradients. A simultaneous Doppler - catheter correlative study. Circulation 1989;80:504-514.
9. Ramirez ML, Wong M: Reproducibility of stand alone continuous wave Doppler recordings of aortic flow velocity across bioprosthetic valves. Am J Cardiol 1985;55:1197-1199.
10. Dumesnil JG, Honos GN, Lemieux M, et al: Validation and applications of indexed aortic prosthetic valve areas calculated by Doppler echocardiography. J Am Coll Cardiol 1990;16:637-643.
11. Huntsman LL, Stewart DK, Barnes SR, et al: Noninvasive Doppler determination of cardiac output in an. Clinical validation. Circulation 1983;67:593-602.
12. Baumgartner H, Khan SS, DeRobertis M, et al: Doppler assessment of prosthetic valve orifice area. An in vitro study. Circulation 1992;85:2275-2283.
13. Wortham DC, Tri TB, Bowen TE: Haemodynamic evaluation of the St. Jude Medical valve prosthesis in the small aortic annulus. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1981;81:615-620.
14. Wiseth R, Levang OW, Tangen G, et al: Exercise haemodynamics in small (< 21mm) aortic valve prostheses assessed by Doppler echocardiography. Am Heart J 1993;125:138-146.
15. Jaffe WM, Coverdale HA, Roche AHG, et al: Rest and exercise haemodynamics of 20 to 23 mm allograft, Medtronic Intact (porcine), and St. Jude Medical valves in the aortic position. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1990;100:167-174.
16. Roedler S, Moritz A, Wutte M, et al: The CarboMedics Top Hat supra annular prosthesis in the small aortic root. J Card Surg 1995;10:198-204.
17. Izzat MB, Birdi I, Wilde P, et al: Evaluation of the haemodynamic performance of small CarboMedics aortic prostheses using dobutamine stress Doppler echocardiography. Ann Thorac Surg 1995;60:1048-1052.
18. Fernandez J, Chen C, Laub G, et al: Predictive value of prosthetic valve area index for early and late clinical results after valve replacement with St. Jude Medical valve prosthesis. Circulation 1996;94(Suppl II):109-112.
19. Danielson R, Nordrehaug JE, Vik-Mo H. Factors affecting Doppler echocardiographic valve area assessment in aortic stenosis. Am J Cardiol 1989; 63:1107-1111.
20. Baumgartner H, Khan S, DeRobertis M, et al. Discrepencies between Doppler and catheter gradients in aortic prosthetic valves in vitro. A manifestation of localized gradients and pressure recovery. Circulation 1990;82:1467-1475.