Computational mechanisms of object constancy for visual recognition revealed by event-related potentials

Vision Research

Volumn 47, Issue 5, 2007, Pages 706-713

  Leek, E Charles ^a   Atherton, Christine J ^b   Thierry, Guillaume ^a  

^a BANGOR UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CENTRAL LANCASHIRE   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Evoked potential; Object constancy; Visual; Visuo spatial transformation

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AMPLITUDE MODULATION; ARTICLE; EVENT RELATED POTENTIAL; HUMAN; NORMAL HUMAN; OBJECT RELATION; ORIENTING RESPONSE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RESPONSE TIME; VISUAL MEMORY; VISUAL ORIENTATION; VISUAL STIMULATION;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY; ELECTRORETINOGRAPHY; EVOKED POTENTIALS, VISUAL; HUMANS; MIDDLE AGED; ORIENTATION; PATTERN RECOGNITION, VISUAL; PHOTIC STIMULATION; PSYCHOPHYSICS; REACTION TIME;

EID: 33846907569     PISSN: 00426989     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.visres.2006.10.021     Document Type: Article

References (47)

1. Alivisatos B., and Petrides M. Functional activation of the human brain during mental rotation. Neuropsychologia 35 (1997) 111-118
2. American Electroencephalographic Society. Guidelines for standard electrode position nomenclature. Journal of Clinical Neurophysiology 11 (1994) 111-113
3. Arguin M., and Leek E.C. Orientation-dependence in visual object recognition: Further evidence from repetition priming and picture naming. Perception and Psychophysics 65 (2003) 469-477
4. Bülthoff H.H., and Edelman S. Psychophysical support for a two-dimensional view interpolation theory of object recognition. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 89 (1992) 60-64
5. Cavanagh P., Labianca A.T., and Thornton I.M. Attention-based visual routines: Sprites. Cognition 80 (2001) 47-60
6. Decaro S.A., and Reeves A. The use of word-picture verification to study entry-level object recognition: Further support for view invariant mechanisms. Memory & Cognition 30 (2002) 811-821
7. Doniger G.M., Foxe J.J., Schroeder C.E., Murray M.M., Higgins B.A., and Javitt D.C. Visual perceptual learning in human object recognition areas: A repetition priming study using high-density electrical mapping. NeuroImage 13 (2001) 305-313
8. Greenhouse S.W., and Geisser S. On methods in the analysis of profile data. Psychometrika 24 (1959) 95-112
9. Harris I.M., and Dux P.E. Orientation-invariant object recognition: Evidence from repetition blindness. Cognition 95 (2005) 73-93
10. Heil M., Rauch M., and Henninghausen E. Response preparation begins before mental rotation is finished: Evidence from event-related brain potentials. Acta Psychologica 99 (1998) 217-232
11. Johnston S.J., Leek E.C., Atherton C.J., Thacker N.A., and Jackson A. Functional contribution of medial pre-motor cortex to visuo-spatial transformation in humans. Neuroscience Letters 355 (2004) 209-212
12. Jolicoeur P. The time to name disoriented natural objects. Memory and Cognition 13 (1985) 289-303
13. Kawamichi H., Kikuchi Y., Endo H., Takeda T., and Yoshizawa S. Temporal structure of implicit motor imagery in visual hand-shape discrimination as revealed by MEG. Neuroreport 9 (1998) 1127-1132
14. Lamm C., Windischberger C., Leodolter U., Moser E., and Bauer H. Evidence for premotor cortex activity during dynamic visuospatial imagery from single- trial functional magnetic resonance imaging and event-related slow cortical potentials. Neuroimage 14 (2001) 268-283
15. Lawson R. Achieving visual object constancy across plane rotation and depth rotation. Acta Psychologica 102 (1999) 221-245
16. Leek E.C., Reppa I., and Arguin M. The structure of 3D object shape representations: Evidence from part-whole matching. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 31 (2005) 668-684
17. Leek E.C. The analysis of orientation-dependent time costs in visual recognition. Perception 27 (1998) 803-816
18. Leek E.C. Effects of stimulus orientation on the recognition of common polyoriented objects. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review 5 (1998) 650-658
19. Leek E.C., and Johnston S.J. A polarity effect in misoriented object recognition: The role of polar features in the computation of orientation-invariant shape representations. Visual Cognition 13 (2006) 573-600
20. Lowe, D. G. (1999). Object recognition from local scale-invariant features. In Proceedings of the international conference on computer vision, Corfu, Greece, pp. 1150-1157.
21. Marr D., and Nishihara H.K. Representation and recognition of the spatial organisation of three-dimensional shapes. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B 207 (1978) 187-217
22. Milivojevic B., Johnson B.W., Hamm J.P., and Corballis M.C. Non-identical neural mechanisms for two types of mental transformation: event-related potentials during mental rotation and mental paper folding. Neuropsychologia 41 (2003) 1345-1356
23. Muthukumaraswamy S.D., Johnson B.W., and Hamm J.P. A high density ERP comparison of mental rotation and mental size transformation. Brain and Cognition 52 (2003) 271-280
24. Neuroscan. (2001). Scan, Version 4.2. El Paso, TX: Compumedics, USA.
25. Oldfield R.C. The assessment and analysis of handedness: The Edinburgh Inventory. Neuropsychologia 9 (1971) 97-113
26. Pegna A.J., Khateb A., Spinelli L., Seeck M., Landis T., and Michel C.M. Unraveling the cerebral dynamics of mental imagery. Human Brain Mapping 5 (1997) 410-421
27. Pellizzer G., and Georgopoulos A.P. Common processing constraints for visuomotor and visual mental rotations. Experimental Brain Research 93 (1993) 165-172
28. Peronnet F., and Farah M.J. Mental rotation: an event-related potential study with a validated mental rotation task. Brain and Cognition 9 (1989) 279-288
29. Perrett D.I., Oram M.W., and Ashbridge E. Evidence accumulation in cell populations responses to faces: an account of generalization of recognition without mental transformations. Cognition 67 (1998) 111-145
30. Picton T.W., Bentin S., Berg P., Donchin E., Hillyard S.A., Johnson Jr. R., et al. Guidelines for using human event-related potentials to study cognition: Recording standards and publication criteria. Psychophysiology 37 (2000) 127-152
31. Pierret A., and Peronnet F. Mental rotation and mirror-image discrimination. Perception and Motor Skills 78 (1994) 515-524
32. Poggio T., and Edelman S. A network that learns to recognize 3D objects. Nature 343 (1990) 263-266
33. Proverbio A.M., Esposito P., and Zani A. Early involvement of the temporal area in attentional selection of grating orientation: an ERP study. Cognitive Brain Research 13 (2002) 139-151
34. Richter W., Ugurbil K., Georgopoulos A., and Kim S.-G. Time-resolved fMRI of mental rotation. Neuroreport 8 (1997) 3697-3702
35. Roelfsema P.R., Lamme V.A.F., and Spekreijse H. The implementation of visual routines. Vision Research 40 (2000) 1385-1411
36. Rock I. Orientation and form (1973), Academic Press, Orlando, FL
37. Rossion B., Joyce C.A., Cottrell G.W., and Tarr M.J. Early lateralization and orientation tuning for face, word and object processing in the visual cortex. NeuroImage 20 (2003) 1609-1624
38. Tagaris G.A., Kim S.-G., Strupp J.P., Andersen P., Ugurbil K., and Georgopoulos A.P. Mental rotation studies by functional magnetic resonance imaging at high field (4 Tesla): Performance and cortical activation. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 9 (1997) 419-432
39. Takano Y. Perception of rotated forms: A theory of information types. Cognitive Psychology 21 (1989) 1-59
40. Tarr M.J., and Pinker S. Mental rotation and orientation-dependence in shape recognition. Cognitive Psychology 21 (1989) 233-282
41. Tarr M.J., and Pinker S. When does human object recognition use a viewer-centred reference frame?. Psychological Science 1 (1990) 253-256
42. Ullman S. Visual routines. Cognition 18 (1984) 97-159
43. Wicker R.C., and Long C.J. The effects of orientation and angularity of pattern elements on visually evoked cortical potentials. International Journal of Neuroscience 8 (1978) 129-134
44. Wijers A.A., Otten L.J., Feenstra S., Mulder G., and Mulder L.J. Brain potentials during selective attention, memory search, and mental rotation. Psychophysiology 26 (1989) 452-467
45. Wilson K.D., and Farah M.J. When does the visual system use viewpoint-invariant representations during recognition?. Cognitive Brain Research 16 (2003) 399-415
46. Wong A.-N., and Hayward W.G. Constraints on view combination: Effects of self-occlusion and differences among familiar and novel views. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 31 (2005) 110-121
47. Yoshino A., Inoue M., and Suzuki A. A topographic electrophysiologic study of mental rotation. Cognitive Brain Research 9 (2000) 121-124