Three-dimensional mapping of the static magnetic field inside the human head

Magnetic Resonance in Medicine

Volumn 36, Issue 5, 1996, Pages 705-714

  Li, Shizhe ^a   Dardzinski, Bernard J ^a   Collins, Christopher M ^a   Yang, Qing X ^a   Smith, Michael B ^a  

^a PENN STATE COLLEGE OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

finite element analysis; magnetic susceptibility; phase image; three dimensional

Indexed keywords

FINITE ELEMENT METHOD; GRAPHIC METHODS; MAGNETIC SUSCEPTIBILITY; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE; THREE DIMENSIONAL COMPUTER GRAPHICS;

FIELD DISTORTIONS; FREQUENCY DIFFERENCES; GEOMETRICAL SHAPES; HISTOGRAM TECHNIQUE; PHASE IMAGE; STATIC MAGNETIC FIELDS; SUSCEPTIBILITY DIFFERENCES; THREE DIMENSIONAL MAPPING;

ELECTROMAGNETIC FIELD EFFECTS;

ANALYTIC METHOD; ARTICLE; BRAIN MAPPING; COMPUTER SIMULATION; DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING; HISTOGRAM; MAGNETIC FIELD; MEMBRANE PERMEABILITY; NONHUMAN; SIGNAL DETECTION; SIGNAL PROCESSING; SPHENOID SINUS; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING;

EID: 0029911435     PISSN: 07403194     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/mrm.1910360509     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. J. Frahm, K. D. Merboldt, W. Hanicke, Direct FLASH MR imaging of magnetic field inhomogeneity by gradient compensation. Magn. Reson. Med. 6, 474-480 (1988).
2. J. Frahm, H. Bruhn, M. L. Gyngell, K. D. Merboldt, W. Hanicke, R. Sauter, Localized proton NMR spectroscopy in different regions of the human brain in vivo: relaxation times and concentrations of cerebral metabolites. Magn. Reson. Med. 11, 47-63 (1989).
3. W. T. Dixon, Simple proton spectroscopy imaging. Radiology 153, 189-194 (1984).
4. o inhomogeneity correction. Magn. Reson. Med. 18, 371-383 (1991).
5. o field variations. Magn. Reson. Med. 34, 65-73 (1995).
6. K. M. Ludeke, P. Poschmann, R. Tischler, Susceptibility artefacts in NMR imaging. Magn. Reson. Imaging 3, 329-343 (1985).
7. H. W. Park, Y. M. Ro, Z. H. Cho, Measurement of the magnetic susceptibility effect in high-field NMR imaging. Phys. Med. Biol. 33, 339-349 (1988).
8. R. E. Went, M. R. Wilcott, W. Nits, P. H. Murphy, R. N. Bryan, MR imaging of susceptibility-induced magnetic field inhomogeneities. Radiology 168, 837-841 (1988).
9. S. Posse, W. P. Aue, Susceptibility artifacts in spin-echo and gradient echo imaging. J. Magn. Reson. 88, 473-492 (1990).
10. C. J. Bakker, R. Bhagwandien, M. A. Moerland, M. Fuderer, Susceptibility artifacts in 2DFT spin-echo and gradient-echo imaging: the cylinder model revisited. Magn. Reson. Imaging 11, 539-548 (1993).
11. I. R. Young, D. G. Khenia, D. G. T. Thomas, C. H. Davis, D. G. Gadian, I. J. Cox, B. D. Ross, G. M. Bydder, Clinical magnetic susceptibility mapping of the brain. J. Comput. Assist. Tomogr. 11, 2-6 (1987).
12. Y. S. Kim, C. W. Mun, Z. H. Cho, Chemical-shift imaging with large magnetic field inhomogeneity. Magn. Reson. Med. 4, 452-460 (1987).
13. H. N. Yeung, D. W. Kormos, Separation of true fat and water images by correcting magnetic field inhomogeneity in situ. Radiology 159, 783-786 (1986).
14. C. C. Lodes, J. P. Felmlee, R. L. Ehman, C. M. Sehgal, J. F. Greeleaf, G. H. Glover, J. E. Gray, Proton MR chemical shift imaging using double and triple phase contrast acquisition methods. J. Comput. Assist. Tomogr. 13, 855-861 (1989).
15. G. H. Glover, Multipoint Dixon technique for water and fat proton and susceptibility imaging. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 1, 521-530 (1991).
16. T. J. Mosher, M. B. Smith, Magnetic susceptibility measurement using a Double-DANTE tagging (DDT) sequence. Magn. Reson. Med. 18, 251-255 (1991).
17. T. J. Mosher, M. B. Smith, Mapping the static magnetic field using a Double-DANTE tagging sequence. J. Magn. Reson. 93, 624-629 (1991).
18. S. Posse, Direct imaging of magnetic field gradients by group spinecho selection. Magn. Reson. Med. 25, 12-29 (1992).
19. Y. M. Ro, Z. H. Cho, Susceptibility magnetic resonance imaging using spectral decomposition. Magn. Reson. Med. 33, 521-528 (1995).
20. S. C. K. Chu, Y. Xu, J. A. Balschi, C. Springer Jr., Bulk magnetic susceptibility shift in NMR studies of compartmentalized samples: use of paramagnetic reagents. Magn. Reson. Med. 13, 239-262 (1990).
21. D. A. Yablonskiy, E. M. Haacke, Theory of NMR signal behavior in magnetically inhomogeneous tissues: the static dephasing regime. Magn. Reson. Med. 32, 749-763 (1994).
22. J. C. Ford, F. W. Wehrli, H. W. Chung, Magnetic field distribution in models of trabecular bone. Magn. Reson. Med. 30, 373-379 (1993).
23. R. Bhagwandien, R. van Ee, R. Beersma, C. J. G. Bakker, M. A. Moerland, J. J. W. Lagendijk, Numerical analysis of the magnetic field for arbitrary magnetic susceptibility distributions in 2D. Magn. Reson. Imaging 10, 299-313 (1992).
24. R. Bhagwandien, M. A. Moerland, C. J. G. Bakker, R. Beersma, J. J. W. Langendikj, Numerical analysis of the magnetic field of arbitrary magnetic susceptibility distributions in 3D. Magn. Reson. Imaging 12, 101-107 (1994).
25. S. Li, G. D. Williams, T. A. Frisk, B. W. Arnold, M. B. Smith, A computer simulation of the static magnetic field distribution in the human head. Magn. Reson. Med. 34, 268-275 (1995).
26. J. D. Kraus, "Electromagnetics," McGraw-Hill, New York, 1984.