Optimization of static field homogeneity in human brain using diamagnetic passive shims

Magnetic Resonance in Medicine

Volumn 48, Issue 5, 2002, Pages 906-914

  Wilson, James L ^a   Jenkinson, Mark ^a   Jezzard, Peter ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OXFORD   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Diamagnetic; fMRI; Inferior frontal cortex; Shimming; Susceptibility artifact

Indexed keywords

MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; SHIMS;

DIAMAGNETIC; FMRI; FRONTAL CORTEX; SHIMMING; SUSCEPTIBILITY ARTIFACTS;

PERTURBATION TECHNIQUES;

ARTICLE; ARTIFACT; BRAIN REGION; FEMALE; FRONTAL CORTEX; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; MAGNETIC FIELD; MAGNETISM; MALE; NORMAL HUMAN; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; OXYGEN BLOOD LEVEL; SIMULATION;

EID: 0036846413     PISSN: 07403194     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/mrm.10298     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Jezzard P, Clare S. Sources of distortion in functional MRI data. Hum Brain Mapp 1999;8:80-85.
2. Ojemann JG, Akbudak E, Snyder AZ, McKinstry RC, Raichle ME, Conturo TE. Anatomic localization and quantitative analysis of gradient refocused echo-planar fMRI susceptibility artifacts. Neuroimage 1997;6:156-167.
3. Merboldt K, Fransson P, Bruhn H, Frahm J. Functional MRI of the human amygdala? Neuroimage 2001;14:253-257.
4. Wilson JL, Jenkinson M, de Araujo J, Kringelbach ML, Rolls ET, Jezzard P. Fast, fully automated global and local magnetic field optimization for fMRI of the human brain. Neuroimage 2002, in press.
5. Devlin J, Russell R, Davis M, Price C, Wilson J, Moss H, Matthews P, Tyler L. Susceptibility-induced loss of signal: Comparing PET and fMRI on a semantic task. Neuroimage 2000;11:589-600.
6. Spielman DM, Adalsteinsson E, Lm KO. Quantitative assessment of improved homogeneity using higher-order shims for spectroscopic imaging of the brain. Magn Reson Med 1998;40:376-382.
7. o inhomogeneity correction. Magn Reson Med 1991;18:371-383.
8. Li S, Dardzinski BJ, Collins CM, Yang QX, Smith MB. Three-dimensional mapping of the static magnetic field inside the human head. Magn Reson Med 1996;36:705-714.
9. o field for non-conducting materials. In: Proceedings of the 10th Annual Meeting of ISMRM, Honolulu, 2002. p 2325.
10. Mansfield P. Multi-planar image formation using NMR spin echoes. J Phys C 1977;10:L55-L58.
11. Ahn CB, Kim JH, Cho ZH. High speed spiral-scan echo planar NMR imaging - I. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 1986;5:2-7.
12. Meyer CH, Hu B, Nishimura D, Mavski A. Fast spiral coronary artery imaging. Magn Reson Med 1992;28:202-213.
13. Glover GH, Law CS, Spiral-in/out BOLD fMRI for increased SNR and reduced susceptibility artifacts. Magn Reson Med 2001;46:515-522.
14. Merboldt K, Finsterbusch J, Frahm J. Reducing inhomogeneity artifacts in functional MRI of human brain activation - Thin sections vs gradient compensation. J Magn Reson 2000;145:184-191.
15. Frahm J, Merboldt KD, Hanicke W. Direct FLASH MR imaging of magnetic field inhomogeneities by gradient compensation. Magn Reson Med 1988;6:474-480.
16. Song AW. Single-shot EPI with signal recovery from the susceptibilityinduced losses. Magn Reson Med 2001;46:407-411.
17. 2-weighted functional MRI. Magn Reson Med 2000;44:525-531.
18. 0 field variations. Magn Reson Med 1995;34:65-73.
19. Deichmann R, Josephs O, Hutton C, Corfield DR, Turner R. Compensation of susceptibility induced BOLD sensitivity losses in echo-planar fMRI imaging. Neuroimage 2002;15:120-135.
20. Brateman L, Bowman TT, Dønstrup S, Scott KN. Magnetic field shimming by Fourier analysis. Magn Reson Med 1988;6:459-473.
21. Gruetter R. Automatic, localised in vivo adjustment of all first- and second-order shim coils. Magn Reson Med 1993;29:804-811.
22. Blamire AM, Rothman AL, Nixon T, Dynamic shim updating: A new approach towards optimized whole brain shimming. Magn Reson Med 1996;36:159-165.
23. Jesmanowicz A, Roopchansingh V, Cox RW, Starewicz P, Punchard WFB, Hyde JS. Local ferroshims using office copier toner. In: Proceedings of the 9th Annual Meeting of ISMRM, Glasgow, Scotland, 2001. p 617.
24. Schenck JF, The role of magnetic susceptibility in magnetic resonance imaging: MRI magnetic compatibility of the first and second kinds. Med Phys 1996;23:815-850.
25. Lide DR. CRC handbook of chemistry and physics, 80th Ed. Boca Raton: CRC Press; 2000.
26. Simon MD, Heflinger LO, Geim AK. Diamagnetically Stabilized Magnet Levitation. Am J Phys 2001;69:702-713.
27. Kinoshita K. Carbon: Electrochemical and Physicochemical Properties. New York: John Wiley & Sons; 1988.
28. McNaught AD. IUPAC Compendium of Chemical Terminology. Oxford: Blackwell Science; 1997.
29. 0 maps. Neuroimage 2001;13:S165.
30. Alecci M, Collins CM, Smith MB, Jezzard P. Radio frequency magnetic field mapping of a 3 tesla birdcage coil: Experimental and theoretical dependence on sample properties. Magn Reson Med 2001;46:379-385,
31. Smith S. Robust automated brain extraction, Neuroimage 2000;11:S625.
32. Zhang Y, Brady M, Smith S. Segmentation of brain MR images through a hidden Markov random field model and the expectation maximization algorithm. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 2001;20:45-57.
33. Jenkinson M, Smith S, A global optimisation method for robust affine registration of brain images. Med Image Anal 2001;5:143-156.
34. Chauvel B, Cathelineau G, Balac S, Lecerf J, de Certaines J. Cancellation of metal-induced MRI artifacts with dual-component paramagnetic and diamagnetic material: Mathematical modelization and experimental verification. J Magn Reson Imaging 1996;6:936-938.
35. Buchli R, Boesiger P, Meier D. Heating effects of metallic implants by MRI examinations. Magn Reson Med 1988;7:255-261.
36. Shellock FG. Metallic neurosurgical implants: Evaluation of magnetic field interactions, heating, and artifacts at 1.5-tesla. J Magn Reson Imaging 2001;14:295-299.