Teaching mathematics: A brightly wrapped but empty gift box

Mathematics Education Research Journal

Volumn 11, Issue 2, 1999, Pages 109-123

  Schuck, Sandy ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY SYDNEY   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 33846848696     PISSN: 10332170     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/BF03217064     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Australian Education Council (1991). A National Statement On Mathematics for Austrahan Schools. Melbourne: Curriculum Corporation.
2. Ball, D. L. (1988). Knowledge and reasoning in mathematical pedagogy: Examining what prospective teachers bring to teacher education (Doctoral dissertation, Michigan State University, 1988), Dissertation Abstracts International, A50(02), 416. (University Microfilms No. AAT8900008).
3. Ball, D. L. (1992). Magical hopes: Manipulatives and the reform of math education. The American Educator, 6(2), 14-18, 46-47.
4. Ball, D. L., & McDiarmid, G. W. (1990). The subject-matter preparation of teachers. In W.R. Houston (Ed.), Handbook of Research on Teacher Education. New York, NY: Macmillan.
5. Bogdan, R. & Biklen, S. K. (1992). Qualitative research for education: An introduction to theory and methods (2nd Ed.). Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
6. Borko, H., Eisenhart, M., Brown, C. A., UnderhilI, R., Jones, D., & Agard, P. C. (1992). Learning to teach hard mathematics: Do novice teachers and their instructors give up too easily? Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 23, 194-222.
7. Carroll, J. (1998). Developing a framework for viewing affective and knowledge factors in teaching primary mathematics. In C. Kanes, M. Goos, & E. Warren (Eds.), Teaching Mathematics in New Times (Proceedings of the 21st annual conference of the Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia, pp.137-144). Brisbane: MERGA.
8. Darling-Hammond, L. (1998). Teachers and teaching: Testing policy hypotheses from a national commission report. Educational Researcher, 27(1), 5-15.
9. Department of Employment, Education and Training (1989). Discipline Review of Teacher Education in Mathematics and Science (Vol. 1). Canberra: Australian Government Printing Service.
10. Dewey, J. (1964). The relation of theory to practice in education. In R. Archambault (Ed.), John Dewey on education. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
11. Feiman-Nemser, S., & Buchmann, M. (1986). The first year of teacher preparation: Transition to pedagogical thinking. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 18, 239-256.
12. Floden, R. E., McDiarmid, G. W., & Wiemers, N. (1990). Learning about mathematics in elementary methods courses (Research Report 90-1). East Lansing, MI: Michigan State University, National Center for Research on Teacher Learning.
13. Foss, D. H. & Kleinsasser, R. (1995, April). Preservice Teachers and a methods instructor: Consensus, contrast and conflict. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco, CA.
14. Foss, D. H., & Kleinsasser, R. (1996). Preservice elementary teachers' views of pedagogical and mathematical content knowledge. Teaching and Teacher Education, 12, 429-442.
15. Kennedy, M. M. (1990). Trends and issues in teachers' subject matter knowledge (Trends and Issues Paper No. 1). Washington, DC: ERIC Clearinghouse on Teacher Education. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED322100).
16. Mayers, C. (1994). Mathematics and mathematics teaching: Changes in pre-service studentteachers' beliefs and attitudes. In G. Bell, B. Wright, N. Leeson, & J. Geake (Eds.), Challenges in mathematics education: Constraints on construction (Proceedings of the 17th annual conference of the Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia, VoI. 2, pp. 419-428). Lismore: MERGA.
17. Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
18. Mosenthal, J. H., & Ball, D. L. (1992). Constructing new forms of teaching: Subject matter knowledge in inservice teacher education. Journal of Teacher Education, 43, 347-356.
19. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (1989). Curriculum and evaluation standards for school mathematics. Reston, VA: Author.
20. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (1991). Professional standards for teaching mathematics. Reston, VA: Author.
21. Quality Solutions and Research. (1997). NUD. IST. Melbourne: Latrobe University.
22. Schmidt, W., & Kennedy, M. (1990). Teachers" and teacher candidates' beliefs about subject matter and about teaching responsibilitzes (Research Report 90-4). East Lansing, MI: Michigan State University, National Center for Research on Teacher Learning.
23. Schuck, S. (1996a). Chains in primary teacher mathematics education courses: An analysis of powerful constraints. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 8, 119-136.
24. Schuck, S. (1996b). Reflections on dilemmas and tensions in mathematics education courses for student teachers. Asia Pacific Journal of Teacher Education, 24, 75-82.
25. Schuck, S. (1997). Using a research simulation to challenge prospective teachers' beliefs about mathematics. Teaching and Teacher Education, 13, 529-539.
26. Schuck, S. (1998). Conversations of the three selves of the prospective primary mathematics teacher. Teaching and Teacher Education, 14, 703-714.
27. Shulman, L. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 5(2), 4-14.
28. Strauss, A. L., & Corbin, J. (1998). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
29. Sullivan, P. (1992, August). Students, classrooms, context, and the role of the teacher. Paper presented at the 7th International Congress on Mathematical Education, Quebec, Canada.
30. Sullivan, P., & Mousley, J. A. (1996). Describing and evaluating mathematics teaching. In J. Mousley & P. Sullivan (Eds.), Learning about teaching (pp. 75-82). Adelaide: The Australian Association of Mathematics Teachers.
31. Taplin, M. (1998). Preservice teachers' problem-solving processes. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 0(3), 59-75.