National missile defense and deterrence

Political Research Quarterly

Volumn 59, Issue 4, 2006, Pages 533-541

  Quackenbush, Stephen L ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 33846635104     PISSN: 10659129     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/106591290605900403     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. Blair, Bruce G. 1993. The Logic of Accidental Nuclear War. Washington, DC: Brookings.
2. Bracken, Paul J. 1983. The Command and Control of Nuclear forces. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
3. Brams, Steven J., and D. Marc Kilgour. 1988. "Deterrence versus Defense: A Game-Theoretic Model of Star Wars." International Studies Quarterly 32: 3-28.
4. Bueno de Mesquita, Bruce. 1985. "The War Trap Revisited." American Political Science Review 79: 56-177.
5. Bundy, McGeorge, George E Kennan, Robert S. McNamara, and Gerard Smith. 1984/1985. "The President's Choice: Star Wars or Arms Control." Foreign Affairs 63: 264-78.
6. Cordesman, Anthony H. 2002. Strategic Threats and National Missile Defenses: Defending the U.S. Homeland. Westport, CT: Praeger.
7. Denoon, David B. H. 1995. Ballistic Missile Defense in the Post-Cold War Era. Boulder, CO: Westview.
8. Government Accountability Office. 2005. "Defense Acquisitions: Status of Ballistic Missile Defense Program in 2004: Report to Congressional Committees." Washington, DC: U.S. Government Accountability Office.
9. Harsanyi, John C. 1977. "Advances in Understanding Rational Behavior." In Robert E. Butts and Jaakko Hintikka, eds., Foundational Problems in Special Sciences. Dordrecht, Netherlands: D. Reidel.
10. Krepon, Michael. 2003. Cooperative Threat Reduction, Missile Defense, and the Nuclear Future. New York: Palgrave.
11. Lawrence, Robert M. 1987. Strategic Defense Initiative. Boulder, CO: Westview.
12. Lebovic, James H. 2002. "The Law of Small Numbers: Deterrence and National Missile Defense. "Journal of Conflict Resolution 46 (August): 455-83,
13. Lennon, Alexander T. J., ed. 2002. Contemporary Nuclear Debates. Cambridge: MIT Press.
14. Lindsay, James M., and Michael E. O'Hanlon. 2001. Defending America: The Case for Limited National Missile Defense. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
15. Miller, Steven E. 2001. "The Flawed Case for Missile Defense." Survival 43: 95-109.
16. Miller, Steven E., and Stephen Van Evera. 1986. The Star Wars Controversy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
17. Missile Defense Agency. 2005. "Tenth Interceptor Emplaced for the Ballistic Missile Defense System." http://www.mda.mil/mdalink/pdf/ 05fyi0071.pdf accessed 20 February 2006.
18. Payne, Rodger A. 2001. "Bush: The Sequel." International Studies Perspectives 2: 305-15.
19. Powell, Robert. 1990. Nuclear Deterrence Theory. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
20. _. 2003. Nuclear Deterrence Theory, Nuclear Proliferation, and National Missile Defense. International Security 27: 86-118.
21. Quackenbush, Stephen L. 2004. "The Rationality of Rational Choice Theory." International Interactions 30: 87-107.
22. _. 2005. "Deterrence Theory: Where Do We Stand?" Manuscript. quackenbushs@missouri.edu.
23. _. 2006. "General Deterrence and International Conflict: Testing Perfect Deterrence Theory." Manuscript, quackenbushs@missouri.edu.
24. Quackenbush, Stephen L., and Frank C. Zagare. 2006. "The War in Kosovo: A Game-Theoretic Analysis." In Jennifer Sterling-Folker, ed., Making Sense of International Relations Theory. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner.
25. Sagan, Scott D. 1993. The Limits of Safety. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
26. Schelling, Thomas C. 1960. The Strategy of Conflict. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
27. Schelling, Thomas C. 1966. Arms and Influence. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
28. Senese, Paul D., and Stephen L. Quackenbush. 2003. "Sowing the Seeds of Conflict: The Effect of Dispute Settlements on Durations of Peace." Journal of Politics 65 (3): 696-717.
29. Slocombe, Walter A. 2000. "The Administration's Approach." Washington Quarterly 23 (3): 79-85.
30. Sokolsky, Richard. 2001. "Imagining European Missile Defense." Survive! 43: 111-28.
31. Trachtenberg, Marc. 1991. History and Strategy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
32. Urayama, Kori. 2004. "China Debates Missile Defense." Survival 46: 123-42.
33. Utgoff, Victor A. 2002. "Proliferation, Missile Defence, and American Ambitions." Survival 44 (2): 85-102.
34. Walt, Stephen M. 2000. "Containing Rogues and Renegades." In Victor A. Utgoff., ed., The Coming Crisis. Cambridge: MIT Press.
35. Wilkening, Dean A. 2000. Ballistic-Missile Defense and Stratege Stability (Adelphi Paper no. 334). London: International Institute for Strategic Studies.
36. Wirtz, James J., and Jeffrey A. Larsen, eds. 2001. Rockets' Red Clare: Missile Defenses and the Future of World Politics. Cambridge, UK: Westview.
37. Zagare, Frank C. 1990. "Rationality and Deterrence." World Politics 42 (2): 238-60.
38. _. 1996. "Classical Deterrence Theory: A Critical Assessment." International Interactions 21: 365-87.
39. _. 2004. "Reconciling Rationality with Deterrence: A Reexamination of the Logical Foundations of Deterrence Theory." Journal of Theoretical Politics 16: 107-41.
40. Zagare, Frank C., and D. Marc Kilgour. 1993. "Asymmetric Deterrence." International Studies Quarterly 37 (March): 1-27.
41. _. 1995. "Assessing Competing Defense Postures: The Strategic Implications of 'Flexible Response.'" World Politics 47(3): 373-417.
42. _. 1998. "Deterrence Theory and the Spiral Model Revisited." Journal of Theoretical Politics 10: 59-87.
43. _. 2000. Perfect Deterrence. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
44. Zakaria, Fareed. 2001. "Don't Oversell Missile Defense." Newsweek, May 14.