Visual perception: Shaping what we see

Current Biology

Volumn 13, Issue 1, 2003, Pages

  Leopold, David A ^a  

^a MAX PLANCK INSTITUTE FOR BIOLOGICAL CYBERNETICS   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0037425615     PISSN: 09609822     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0960-9822(02)01379-9     Document Type: Review

References (20)

1. Howard, I.P. and Rogers, B.J. (2002). Seeing in depth. Ontario, Canada, I. Porteus.
2. Hubel, D. (1988). Eye, Brain and Vision. (Scientific American Library).
3. Desimone, R., Albright, T.D., Gross, C.G. and Bruce, C. (1984). Stimulus-selective properties of inferior temporal neurons in the macaque. J. Neurosci. 4, 2051-2062.
4. Janssen, P., Vogels, R. and Orban, G. A. (2000). Selectivity for 3D shape that reveals distinct areas within macaque inferior temporal cortex. Science 288, 2054-2056.
5. Logothetis, N.K. and Sheinberg, D.L. (1996). Visual object recognition. Annu. Rev. Neurosci. 19, 577-621.
6. Perrett, D.I., Rolls, E.T. and Caan, W. (1982). Visual neurones responsive to faces in the monkey temporal cortex. Exp. Brain Res. 47, 329-342.
7. Gregory, R. (1997). Eye and brain: The psychology of seeing. (5th edn), (Princeton University Press).
8. Koffka, K. (1935). Principles of Gestalt Psychology. New York, Harcourt, Brace and World.
9. Suzuki, S. and Peterson, M.A. (2000). Multiplicative effects of intention on the perception of bistable apparent motion. Psychol. Sci. 11, 202-209.
10. Girgus, J.J., Rock, I. and Egatz, R. (1977). The effect of knowledge of reversibility on the reversibility of ambiguous figures. Percept. Psychophys. 22
11. Suzuki, S. and Grabowecky, M. (2002). Evidence for perceptual 'trapping' and adaptation in multistable binocular rivalry. Neuron 36, 143-157.
12. Suzuki, S. (2001). Attention-dependent brief adaptation to contour orientation: a high-level aftereffect for convexity? Vision Res. 41, 3883-3902.
13. Suzuki, S. and Cavanagh, P. (1998). A shape-contrast effect for briefly presented stimuli. J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform. 24, 1315-1341.
14. Gegenfurtner, K.R. and Scharpe, L.T. (1999). Color vision: from genes to perception. (Cambridge University Press).
15. Leopold, D.A., O'Toole, A.J., Vetter, T. and Blanz, V. (2001). Prototype-referenced shape encoding revealed by high-level aftereffects. Nat. Neurosci. 4, 89-94.
16. Rock, I. (1984). Perception. (Scientific American Library).
17. Long, G.M., Toppino, T.C. and Mondin, G.W. (1992). Prime time: fatigue and set effects in the perception of reversible figures. Percept. Psychophys. 52, 609-616.
18. Leopold, D.A. and Logothetis, N.K. (1999). Multistable phenomena: changing views in perception. Trends Cognit. Sci. 3, 254-264.
19. Blake, R. and Logothetis, N.K. (2002). Visual competition. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 3, 13-21.
20. Tong, F. and Engel, S.A. (2001). Interocular rivalry revealed in the human cortical blind-spot representation. Nature 411, 195-199.